Aging society: organization of long-term care for the elderly in Poland.
-
Copyright
© 2018 PRO MEDICINA Foundation, Published by PRO MEDICINA Foundation
User License
The journal provides published content under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution-International Non-Commercial Use (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
Authors
Background: Aging
society is one of the main challenges of the organization and provision of
health care in XXI century. In 2030 more
than one third of Polish population will be older than 65 years old and every
tenth person will be more than 80 years old. Ageing of
the population and dependency trends fuel the demand for
long-term care. This raising demand is challenging for both finance and
organization of health and social care. Despite of existing reports and
publication on long term care or elderly care in Poland, there is a lack of
publications that include all forms of available support that are scattered in
various provisions systems. A robust overview is needed for accurate planning
of required changes to prepare the system for future demographic challenges.
Goal: description of organization of formal and
informal long-term care for the elderly in Poland considering various financial
systems.
Methods: Review of available reports, publications and legal bills related to long term and/or elderly care in Poland. A non-systematic literature review in English and Polish sources has been conducted in March 2018.
Results: Long term care of elderly patients in Poland
is scattered through various financial and provisions systems. Population aging
and growing dependency ratio requires to prepare the system for growing demand
for long term care.
Introduction
Aging society is a challenging demographic
trend in the whole Europe and Poland is no exception
Goal of this article is a description of
organization of formal and informal long-term care for the elderly in Poland
considering various financial systems. To gather information a non-systematic
literature review in English and Polish sources has been conducted in March
2018. The review is based not only on peer-reviewed publications, but also on
available reports and legal bills related to long term and/or elderly care
Poland.
Demographic
situation assessment
Current demographic trends in Europe and in
Poland are mainly defined by post war baby boom, that happened depending from
region between 1940-1960. First generation from this peak have already entered
retirement age. In the same time, we can observe increased life expectation and
lowered fertility rates. It’s being estimated
that until 2050 Polish population will decrease by 11%, from reported 38,5M in
2013 to 33.9 M in 2050. In the same time, median age will increase from 38,6 in
2013 to 54,3 in 2050. Until 2050 we will observe 1.9 fold increase of the
elderly population (defined as 65+) that will reach 11 M
Long-term care
OECD defines
long-term care as an organization and provision of a wide range of services and
assistance to people who have limited ability to function independently on a
daily basis for a long time due to physical and/or mental disability (4). The
Act on Vocational and Social Rehabilitation and Employment of People with
Disabilities defines disability as "inability to fulfill social roles due
to permanent or long-term impairment of wellbeing, in particular resulting in
inability to work", it may be permanent or periodic (5). The demand for
long-term care depends directly from individual disability not from age itself,
however there is a strong correlation between age and disability level. It’s
necessary to assess correctly disability levels to assist with targeting
individualized support needs or to plan for required support on a population
level. The
tools that are being widely used for determining the level of disability are Activities
of Daily Living (ADLs) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). The
first scale (ADLs) includes basic activities such as eating, bathing, dressing,
getting out of bed, using toilets, activities related to household management such
as preparing meals, shopping, housekeeping, are covered by the IADLs scale (4).
On IADL scale, an assessed patient can score from 8 to 24 points. Independent
functioning is attributed to people reaching the value of 24 points, people
with partially impaired functioning achieve results 23-19 points, and people
with severely impaired functioning 18-8 points. In the group of people aged
65+, 52.1% require some form of help in daily functioning. This group is not
homogeneous, with a highest level of impaired daily functioning in 90+ age
groups reaching more than 90% (6). Assuming an unchanging level of impairment in
individual age groups overtime, we can estimate that in 2050 5.8 million people
will require help in everyday functioning.
The group of
people requiring most intensive assistance are the disabled patients, whose ADL
value ranges from 0-2. Patients with this score are unable to wash themselves,
dress themselves, use the toilet. Similar to daily functioning assessment this
group isn’t homogenous. In the 65-69 age group, only 0.1% of the population is
disabled and required high level of support, whereas in the 90+ group this share
reaches 12% (6). We can estimate that in 2050, over 440,000 people aged 65+
will depend completely from support caregivers in their daily activities. This
means that for every 1,000 people aged 15-64, there will be 24 disabled older
people, who due to health condition are unable to manage basic daily activities
as washing or dressing themselves or use a toilet. This impose a need to
provide an appropriate assistance tailored to the state of disability and the
individual needs of elderly people considering demographic changes in Poland.
Long-term care system in Poland
There is no distinct and uniform long-term
care system, and available benefits and services are distributed among various
sectors of the broad social security system (Figure 3). There is also no
long-term care system targeted directly at elderly population, however there
are specific services focusing on this group.
Health care
services
Long-term care provided in scope of health
care services is intended for severely impaired and chronically ill patients
who do not require hospitalization, and due to significant deficits in
self-care abilities require, professional health care support and treatment
continuation. Long-term care cannot be provided to persons qualifying for social
assistance homes or for whom the support is needed due to a difficult social
situation or advanced cancer (7). Long term health care services are not
intended for elderly patients only, however patient 65+ are main beneficiary of
these services (Figure 4).
Long-term care can be provided in inpatient
setting in following services:
·
Nursing and
treatment institutions (Zakłady Opiekuńczo-lecznicze - ZOL);
·
Nursing and care institutions
(Zakłady pielęgnacyjno opiekuńcze - ZPO);
·
Palliative care
homes (Domy opieki paliatywnej - DOP);
·
Hospital
(department for the chronically ill patients).
Care services can be provided in outpatient
and home setting as well i.e. nurse support at home; hospice care at home;
visits in the hospice care clinic (8).
Patients requiring support from ZOL or ZPO
institutions receive an application issued by a family doctor or from a
hospital after a treatment in a hospital setting. Requirement for the
institution care is being assessed using Modified Barthel Index (9). Health
care services provided in the facilities are financed from the National Health
Services(NHS) budget, while the costs of meals and accommodation are covered by
patients. The monthly out of pocket cost is fixed at the level of 250% of the
lowest pension with a ceiling rule, that the amount paid cannot exceed 70% of
patient’s monthly income. If patient requires enteral or parenteral nutrition, NHS
reimburse this expenditure.
DOP are intended primarily for patients in a
difficult health condition in the end of life stage of disease. The hospice
care is aimed at improving the quality of life, aims to prevent pain and other
somatic symptoms and to relieve them and to alleviate mental suffering. This
care also includes support for the patient's family (10).
In 2016, there were 554 ZOL and ZPO
institutions and 155 hospice facilities. Long-term care and hospice and
palliative care facilities had a total of 34.9 thousand beds, 1.6% more than in
the previous year. The facilities provided care in stationary setting for 98.5
thousand people (11).
In addition,
health care for the elderly patients is dispersed among the standard benefits
under health care insurance, such as: primary care; outpatient specialist care
(including geriatric wards); hospital treatment; rehabilitation therapy. Some
of these services are organized and have financial incentives to ensure the
quality of care for the elderly. For example, NHS has established higher
capitalization rates for primary care for patient’s elderly patients amounting
2,1 and 2,5 for 65+ and 75+ patients respectively (12). It should be stressed
that these benefits do not qualify as long-term care for the elderly, however
are important aspects of health care provisions.
Social
welfare system
In the social welfare system, benefits can be
divided into cash benefits and service benefits, the latter being the subject
of this analysis. As in the case of healthcare system, services provided to
elderly people are scattered through various forms of available benefits and
are not intended for elderly patients only and can be provided in an inpatient
and outpatient setting or at patient’s home. There are three main types of
services available: Social welfare homes (Domy pomocy społecznej - DPS); Day
care social welfare homes; Home care services.
DPS is an institution providing support services 24
hours a day in an inpatient setting, the standard of care is regulated by the
Minister of Labor and Social Policy (13). Care for the elderly in DPS is
considered the last resort of support, used when other assistance options have
been exhausted. Admission to DPS institution is preceded by an assessment of patient’s
health state and a verification if help cannot be provided in the home care
system. In the case of DPS, unlike in healthcare system, there is a distinction
for the elderly care. In the same time, elderly care is not limited to these
centers only. Patients are obliged to cover cost of stay in the DPS, similar to
ZOL and ZPO fee, it cannot exceed 70% of income. If patient or family is not
able to cover the fee, the costs are covered by the municipality budget.
Support services provided at home, apart from care
for patient suffering from mental illness, belong to the local community's
tasks and budget. These services are delivered for impaired patients, where families
are not able to deliver required assistance. The care provided includes both support
in meeting everyday life needs, hygiene, an assistance related to functioning
in society and support in medical treatment tailored to individual needs (14).
Private Care
Private care includes care provided by private
vendors and paid out of pocket by patient or family members. In the Mazowieckie
Voivodeship there are 102 private nursing homes registered and 108 DPS (15).
This form of care is partly regulated by local authorities. Private care is
fully paid from patients and / or families funds, which is a barrier to access
to this type of care. Private care, as in the case of health and social care,
can be provided in an inpatient or outpatient setting or delivered at home.
It’s difficult to assess how many elderly people are using private care in
Poland, an analysis from Szczecin conducted in 2011 shows that out of over
2,000 patients using long term care system including both health and social
care, only 5% were covered by private care (16). This analysis focus on
institutionalized care and doesn’t include private, professional caregivers
providing support at home.
The most common form of providing long term
care for elderly patients in Poland is the informal care (3). Informal long
term care is based on support provided free of charge by the family members or
friends. This form of care in the case of a low level of disability of an elderly
person is the most cost-effective form of care. In this cases support focuses on
household tasks and basic medical support i.e. monitoring medication. In case
of patients with higher levels of dependence the burden of caregivers becomes
too large and replacement or supplementation with formal or institutionalized care
is necessary. Currently, such supplementation is possible within the framework
of health and social care services, but the coordination of these services is
very limited. Even though this form of
care is the basic form of elderly care in Poland, there is little information
and regulation on the support of caregivers with additional services, such as daily
stays for the elderly, trainings, and temporary long-term inpatient stays. Informal
caregivers of elderly patients receive also limited financial benefits, they are
not entitled for care allowance applying for caregivers of disabled child. State
covers caregivers’ pension contributions under the condition of resignation of
employment because of the need to provide long-term care for seriously ill
family member (17). It’s important to consider informal care in accurate
planning of required changes in the long term care for elderly, although
seemingly free of charge informal care is associated with indirect costs, which
are often overlooked in the assessment of care systems for elderly (18).
Discussion:
Long-term care for elderly patients in Poland
is a hybrid system based on services provided within healthcare and social care
systems and private care delivered mainly through informal caregivers. Although
in theory a broad scope of services tailored to different levels of
disabilities are available, the systems and services offered seems to be
disconnected. There is also a lack of clear coordination between different systems
and services that have a potential to complement each other i.e. daytime
support and informal care at home.
To provide optimal care for elderly patients, individual
needs related to disability level should be considered. Providing care in hospitals
or nursing institutions to patients with only minor disability is not a
cost-effective resource allocation, as health care sector generates relatively
high costs, regardless of patients’ degree of dependence (19). Economic analyses
suggest that in case of low degree of dependence home based services are sufficient
and provide optimal care. In the same time providing care at home in case of severely
disabled patients can generate higher cost than in a hospital setting. Cost of
home care based on support of informal caregivers are frequently
underestimated, as cost of informal caregivers that include indirect costs are usually
not takes into consideration in cost estimations. To sustain quality of home
based care on a cost-effective level when patients’ dependency ratio increases,
informal caregivers should be supported with additional home based services. Social
welfare system should provide this support, however currently available solutions
are not sufficient and not well connected. Every summer there are recurring press
articles how elderly disabled patients are being abandoned in hospitals, even
though patients’ condition doesn’t require hospitalization. It’s a clear
example of resource allocation that it’s not tailored to specific patients’
needs, that causes unnecessary health care expenditures. This problem could be
solved by better coordination of services and proper inclusion and recognition
of informal caregivers.
Considering growing size of elderly population
and dependency ratio in Poland, decision makers should better integrate currently
available support services including informal caregivers, to tailor care to individual
patient needs. Tailored care would not only provide optimal care for patients
but will allow most cost-effective resource allocation. Informal home based
care, that is currently most common form of providing care in Poland might not
be sufficient anymore to provide optimal support for elderly. There is a need
to find a right balance between home-based care and in-patient care, using
better integration of available services and strengthening support for informal
caregivers. To plan for these systemic changes in Poland, it is necessary to
conduct a comprehensive cost assessment of different forms of care that will
include also cost of informal care.
Conclusions:
The organization of long-term care will have to face future demographic challenges and a growing dependency ratio. It is important to adapt the long-term care system to the specific patients’ needs considering their level of disability. Proper integration of various forms of care including informal care and different financial systems is necessary to make optimal use of available, limited resources.
Based on
Figure 2. Dependency ratio of elderly population by year
Based on
Figure 3. Organization of long-term care for the elderly population in Poland
Figure 4. Patient’s age structure in in-patient long-term care facilities (11)
1. Eurostat. Population structure and ageing 2017
[internet]. Luxemburg: Eurostat;2018. Available from:
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing2.
2. Główny Urząd Statystyczny(GUS).
Prognoza ludności na lata 2014-2050 [internet]. Warszawa:GUS;2014.Available
from: http://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/prognoza-ludnosci/prognoza-ludnosci-na-lata-2014-2050-opracowana-2014-r-,1,5.html
3. European Network of Economic Policy
Research Institutes (ENEPRI). A typology
of long-term care systems in Europe [internet];
2011. Available from: https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/book/2011/07/ENEPRI%20RR%20No%2091%20Typology%20of%20LTC%20%20Systems%20in%20Europe.pdf
4. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD). Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for
Long-Term Care OECD [internet]. Paris:OECD;2011. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/help-wanted-9789264097759-en.htm
5. Ustawa o rehabilitacji zawodowej i społecznej
oraz zatrudnieniu osób
niepełnosprawnych. Dz.U.97.123.776
6. Instytut Pracy i Spraw
Socjalnych Warszawa. Raport na temat sytuacji osób starszych w Polsce
[internet]. Warszawa 2012. Available from: http://senior.gov.pl/source/raport_osoby%20starsze.pdf
7. Grupa Robocza ds.
Przygotowania Ustawy o Ubezpieczeniu od Ryzyka. Opieka długoterminowa w Polsce.
Opis, diagnoza, rekomendacje [internet]. Warszawa 2010. Available from: http://rszarf.ips.uw.edu.pl/kierunki/ODzielona.pdf
8. Zarządzenie Prezesa
NFZ Nr 61/2007/DSOZ http://www.nfz.gov.pl/zarzadzenia-prezesa/zarzadzenia-prezesa-nfz/zarzadzenie-nr-612007dsoz,2833.html
9. Błędowski P, Maciejasz
M. Rozwój opieki długoterminowej w Polsce stan i rekomendacje. Nowiny Lekarskie
2013, 82 (1) 61–69. Polish
10. Rozporządzenie
Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 29 października 2013 r. w sprawie świadczeń
gwarantowanych z zakresu opieki paliatywnej i hospicyjnej. http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20130001347
11. Główny Urząd
Statystyczny(GUS). Zdrowie i ochrona zdrowia w 2016 roku [internet]. Warszawa:GUS;2016. Available from: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/zdrowie-i-ochrona-zdrowia-w-2016-r-,1,7.html
12. Zarządzenie Prezesa
NFZ Nr 50/2016/DSOZ http://nfz.gov.pl/zarzadzenia-prezesa/zarzadzenia-prezesa-nfz/zarzadzenie-nr-502016dsoz,6489.html
13. Rysz-Kowalczyk B. Polityka
społeczna gmin i powiatów. Kompendium wiedzy o instytucjach i procedurach. Dom
Wydawniczy Elipsa; Warszawa 2011, 69-70.
14. Mikołajczyk B.
Człowiek starszy w rodzinie – wybrane aspekty prawne. W: Szatur-Jaworska B.,
redaktor. Strategie działania w starzejącym się społeczeństwie. Tezy i
rekomendacje. Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich, Warszawa; 2012, 42.
15. Mazowiecki Urząd Wojewódzki.
Rejestr Domów Pomocy Społecznej Województwa Mazowieckiego. Warszawa 2017. Available from: https://www.mazowieckie.pl/pl/dla-klienta/polityka-spoleczna/rejestry-i-wykazy/819,dok.html
16. Bażydło M, Karakiewicz
A, Lubkowska A,Karakiewicz B. Dostępność opieki dla osób starszych w Polsce na
przykładzie miasta Szczecin. brak miejsca : Problemy Pielęgniarstwa, 2013. Tom
21, 4. Polish
17. Roszewska B. Składki
na ubezpieczenia emerytalne i rentowe osób sprawujących opiekę nad osobami
niepełnosprawnymi. Prawo Budżetowe
Państwa i Samorządu, 2015, Tom 1.
18. Schubert A, Czech M, Gębska-Kuczerowska A. Evaluation of economic effects of population ageing – methodology of estimating indirect costs. 3 Przegląd Epidemiologiczny, 2016, Tom 69. Polish
19 Jackson W A, The political economy of population ageing. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham and Northampton, 1998, English