0.2
2022CiteScore
 
37th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

The value of the health care transition in the treatment of patients with rare diseases - highlights for clinicians

  • Copyright
    © 2023 PRO MEDICINA Foundation, Published by PRO MEDICINA Foundation
    User License
    The journal provides published content under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution-International Non-Commercial Use (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.

Authors

Name Affiliation
Katarzyna A. Milska-Musa
1 Division of Quality of Life Research, Faculty of Health Sciences with Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
Kinga Labunets
Division of Internal and Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences with Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
Beata Kieć-Wilk
Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
Jolanta Wierzba
Division of Internal and Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences with Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
contributed: 2023-09-13
final review: 2023-11-08
published: 2023-12-02
Corresponding author: Katarzyna A. Milska-Musa katarzyna.milska-musa@gumed.edu.pl
Abstract

Advances in medical science, the development of diagnostics and modern treatments have contributed to prolonging the survival of patients with chronic diseases and/or disabilities. The adolescence stage is a crucial period in everyone's life and, in the case of patients with disabilities, it is also a challenging period. It is at this stage that social problems or difficulties associated with adolescence become apparent. A change in the form of healthcare provision also takes place at this stage. A properly planned process affects not only the patients' health needs, but also their social development. The transition of adolescents with chronic diseases and/or disabilities from paediatric to dedicated adult care is a complex process that requires appropriate coordination to ensure continuity of highly specialised healthcare. The quality of the transition process depends on the commitment of physicians, but also of patients and their caregivers. Despite the medical community's awareness of the benefits of a properly organised transition process, there is still a lack of standardised recommendations and standards for this process. Few adolescents with chronic diseases receive any support during this period. Understanding the challenges of the transition process is key to providing holistic care for patients and their caregivers. This article searches the available literature on the topic of transtion to present current knowledge in this area. Barriers and challenges to the transition process are identified, but also the steps of a properly structured transition process from paediatric to adult care, as proposed by GotTransition, are presented.



Keywords: pediatric to adult transition, pediatric special health care needs, transfer care, transition of healthcare, rare disease

Purpose

The purpose of this article was to indicate the legitimacy of organizing an effective and caring process of transferring patients with special health problems, as well as to present the model and related elements that could be an inspiration in facilitating the transition process in Poland.

Introduction

The progress in medical sciences, growing number of clinical trials, and increasingly easier access to modern technologies and innovative drug therapy have significantly influenced the issue of life expectancy in patients with special medical issues. The problems faced by teenagers and young adults who suffer from chronic diseases or disabilities are more and more often becoming the subjects of research in the field of medical sciences. With the development of diagnostic techniques and the modernisation of the treatment process, the lives of numerous patients who require access to multi-specialty health care and individual care for their whole lives have become subject to increasing scrutiny [1]. Currently, as over 85% of children with chronic diseases, including genetic diseases, reach adult age, the moment of transition from paediatric care to healthcare dedicated to adults seems to become a major challenge among multiple aspects of medical care [2].

The responsibility for the care of a teenage patient after he or she becomes an adult is transferred from the paediatric clinic to adult healthcare. However, many patients still remain in the care of paediatric facilities, although they have already turned 18. So far, the healthcare system has not provided a realistic healthcare path for those who suffer e.g., from microsomia or intellectual disability, for whom the stay at ambulatory or hospital facilities involves severe stress, but also difficulties in access to medical equipment (e.g., for densitometry, gastroscopy or spirometry) at internal medicine units for adult patients who have the anthropometric parameters of a child.

An increasing number of young adults are faced with problems, barriers, and multiple issues concerning transitional care. Most young people do not have sufficient access to services and supporting measures in the transition period. An example may be the patients who have been diagnosed with metabolic disorders, such as phenylketonuria (PKU). At most healthcare facilities, persons with this diagnosis are treated at paediatric centres, while special emphasis is put on the specialist care dedicated to those patients due to the specificity of their disorder (including reproductive aspects that may be significant for their children) [3]. In Poland, a consensus was finally reached, so that adult patients with this disorder are treated by physicians who specialise in metabolic paediatric medicine, in cooperation with gynaecologists and internal medicine specialists.

Many diseases that used to be considered to be childhood diseases, e.g. cystic fibrosis and some life-threatening metabolic disorders should now be treated as disorders that start in childhood and then continue in adult life [4]. The extended survival period of this group of patients even more strongly emphasises the legitimacy of organising an effective and care-oriented process of transition. At the same time, it is one of the main challenges faced by the healthcare system in the upcoming century [5].

The importance of the transition process

Already as early as 30 years ago, scientists were aware of the existence of the problem of transition from paediatric to adult healthcare. The transition process was first mentioned in a study by Robert Blum in 1993 [6], where transition was defined as a purposeful, planned movement of teenagers and young adults with chronic medical and physical diseases from the system of healthcare that focuses on children to the healthcare system that is dedicated to adults. This definition remains valid today, and it is currently promoted by the American Society for Adolescent Medicine [7]. According to this study, transition is a complex process that requires the involvement, skills, and coordination of multiple parties, including the patients, their families, physicians and healthcare decision makers, in order to function properly.

Specialists from numerous countries see the need to create specialist facilities for adult patients with special health-related needs and emphasise the importance of the coordination of the process of transition from paediatric healthcare to healthcare dedicated to adults [3]. However, a review of the relevant research demonstrates that the issues related to the transition from paediatric to adult healthcare are somewhat of a niche category in the healthcare policies of various states. At the same time, although there are only a few healthcare documents available that touch upon the transition issue, there is still insufficient empirical evidence that would allow us to implement tested, realistic principles in clinical practice, including in Poland [8,9]. Currently, most states do not use any guidelines that would describe a correctly planned process of transition of patients from paediatric to adult healthcare, which means that such processes should be developed in the future.

The main aim of a well-planned transition process is to ensure the continuity of multi-specialty care over patients with chronic diseases, as well as to offer them a chance to obtain more independence and autonomy in adult life [10]. This process involves certain risks, as the stage of transition from paediatric care to healthcare that focuses on adults is a period of increased risk of deterioration of the health outcomes of the patients and of lower satisfaction with the received specialist care, as well as the risks connected to the potential deterioration of the quality of life of patients. Sometimes, young adults, after leaving their homes and taking over full responsibility for their treatment, tend to avoid doctors and do not make prophylactic or follow-up appointments. Literature reveals that the rate of patients who fall out of specialist care after the transition from paediatric to internal medicine facilities is high. For example, for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH), it is as many as 50% of patients [10], and for the Turner syndrome 30% of adult patients [11]. Those young people often contact specialists again in cases of emergency or crisis that might not have occurred if they had maintained regular contact and the appropriate prophylactic measures.

Lack of transformation process and its consequences

Currently, neither Poland nor multiple other countries offer a developed medical care dedicated to adults who suffer from rare diseases [8, 13]. Patients from this group are currently “transferred” to adult healthcare without any special preparation or coordination or, on the contrary, they remain in the care of paediatricians although they have reached adult age. The presented solutions generate numerous difficulties. A specialist who takes over a patient with a rare disease does not have access to information about previous treatment, which complicates the chances for the implementation of adequate therapy in potential emergency and health/life-threatening situations, due to the lack of knowledge about the given patient [14]. In the second situation, i.e. if the patient remains in paediatric healthcare, the arising difficulties result from different methods of treatment depending on age (e.g. in cases of hypertension). The absence of a coordinated healthcare system based on the transition of patients from paediatric care to adult facilities may have a significant influence on both the efficiency of the treatment process and on the quality of life of those patients. This means that it is justified to explore the subject of transition while at the same time emphasising its importance for patients with rare diseases and their families [15–17].

The transition from paediatric healthcare to healthcare dedicated to adults is an event that may determine the further appropriate functioning of patients, so the correct management of the transition process should become a fundamental element of the so-called good practices in medicine. Ideally, the goal of the discussed transition process is to provide continuous, coordinated healthcare that will be appropriately and comprehensively organised in both its formal and social aspects [18].

 

Basic principles of transition

In the last 20 years, numerous policy documents aimed at improving transitional care have been published, mainly in the UK, Germany, the USA, and Australia [19]. One of the more popular guidelines concerning transitional care are the guidelines proposed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, developed by a professional association of doctors and focusing on the strategies of transition between different forms of healthcare [20]. Even though many countries have expressed their desire to attempt to solve the problems related to transition, only the UK and Australia published documents that provided a detailed description of the transition strategies supported, additionally, by the given state.

The concepts of the fundamental principles of the transition system are usually consistent in all policy areas presented by various states. All of them emphasise the difficulties with which healthcare workers are confronted, and some of them provide practical guidelines on the organisation of the process of preparing the care over patients in the period of transition from paediatric to adult healthcare and point out the importance of the involvement of children, their parents, and doctors in this process. Unfortunately, the developed guidelines are often insufficient to lead to significant changes, and they remain in the theoretical sphere, without being applied in clinical practice. Although the needs related to the transition process are relatively well described, the most important link, i.e., the recipe stating “how to do it” is still missing. The medical database contains documents that describe what a correctly planned transition process should look like [8, 9]. The structure of the process is described, among others, in the guidelines of NICE of 2016 [21], American Academy of Pediatrics [22], Canadian Association of Paediatric Health Centres [23] or by the Got Transition center [24]

Got Transition Centre

The description of a perfectly structured transition process should start with the Got Transition center and the Six Core Elements [24, 25]. Got Transition is a national centre that conducts research on health care transition (HCT). The center is financed by the federal government, and its aim is to improve the process of transition from paediatric to adult healthcare by means of using evidence-based strategies for the stakeholders of the healthcare system, including the doctors, the funder of the healthcare, and the patients and their parents or legal guardians.

Got Transition developed the Six Core Elements approach, which is also referenced in the guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics 2018, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American College of Physicians. The six elements refer to the main components of a correctly structured transition process. Moreover, the center has developed tools dedicated to each of the individual elements, which may be helpful in making the whole process more efficient. The elements proposed by Got Transition cover three main sections: planning, transition, and integration of care. As with any other solution, this also has its main objectives. These include:

  1. Improving the ability of adolescents and young adults with special healthcare needs to manage their own healthcare and use the healthcare services efficiently.
  2. Ensuring an organised process in the paediatric and internal medicine healthcare systems in order to facilitate the transition and transfer of care. 

The Six Core Elements from Got Transition represent a structured approach to healthcare transition for adolescents and young adults with special healthcare needs including patients with rare diseases also. These elements have gained recognition and support for being a best practise in healthcare transition due to several reasons which include:

1.      Evidence-Based approach: The Six Core Elements are based on research. It provides a structured frameworks that ensures a comprehensive and evidence-based approach to organizing transition care for patients with various diseases.

2.      Patients-Centered perspective: The model places a strong emphasis on the needs and prefereneces of adolescents or young adults. It recognizes the importance of individualized care and supports their active involvement in the transition process.

3.      Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Healthcare transition often involves multiple healthcare providers, specialists and support services. The Six Core Elements promote collaboration among different healthcare providers, including pediatric and adulth healthcare teams, to ensure a coordinated transition plan.

4.      Quality Improvement: The Six Core Elements offer a systematic approach that encourages continuous quality improvement in healthcare transition services. By setting clear standards and monitoring progress, healthcare providers can continually enhance the transition process.

5.      Measurable Outcomes: The model includes specific, measurable outcomes to assess the success of the transition process. This allows healthcare providers to track progress and make necessary adjustments to improve the experience for the young adults and their families.

       American Recognition: Got Transition, the organization behind the Six Core Elemenets, has received recognition and support from national healthcare organizations and government agencies, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physician. This recognition lends credibility to the approach and encourages its adoption by healthcare providers.

Six Core Elements

According to the guidelines provided by Got Transition, a correctly planned transition process should consist of six “events”. The illustration below presents the subsequent steps taken by paediatricians, general physicians, and patients. 

Fig. 1 Six Core ElementsGot Transition

 

Stage I: POLICY/GUIDE

At the first stage of the process, it is recommended to prepare a guide, i.e. a certain type of guidelines, concerning the transition from one form of care to another. The developed document should contain the characteristics of the role played by every person involved in the process, from the adolescents and their parents to the physicians providing care for the patient. The final version of the document should be adapted to the given centre and the recipients of the transition process. A policy developed in this way should provide a description of the transition practice used as well as an explanation of the approach to the care provided by doctors who take care of adults. It is essential to address the issue of the patient’s privacy, to present the previously taken medical actions in detail, as well as all consents required for the transfer of care. 

Stage II: TRACKING AND MONITORING

The next step consists of tracking and monitoring the process. This phase should involve the development of the criteria and the process of identifying patients (adolescents) at the age of transition who should start the process of preparing for transition. The guidelines of Got Transition recommend developing a dedicated process of tracking the level of reception of the six described elements of transition and integrating such data (as far as possible) with the patient’s medical documentation.

Stage III: READINESS

Measuring readiness for transition among the target group to whom the process applies is a crucial element of the whole process. Regularly conducted assessment of the readiness for transition, starting from the age of 14 to the age of 16, enables those responsible to identify and discuss the emerging problems of young people and their parents/guardians and their needs related to self-care and using healthcare services at an early stage. In order to assess readiness for transition, Got Transition proposed a questionnaire entitled Sample Transition Readiness Assessment for Youth, which may be used to check how well the patient handles the main issues related to organising their own self-care. Additionally, apart from the tool developed by Got Transition, there is also a questionnaire entitled Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire. Its aim is to assess the readiness of adolescents to start the transition process. The questionnaire has been translated into 9 languages (at the time of preparing this article, the Polish language version was unavailable). At this stage, education should also be provided for patients and their families, at a level adapted to the results achieved during the assessment of the readiness for transition.

Stage IV: PLANNING

Planning and organisation of the process constitute the fourth of the six core elements of transition. Appropriate planning of the transition from paediatric care to care dedicated to adults should take place in cooperation both with the young people (patients) and their parents/legal guardians. This process should start at the early stage of adolescence, and it should be continued until the patient is released from paediatric care. Planning and organisation of transition include several continuous elements whose aim is to build health awareness, the ability to manage their own treatment process, the ability to provide independent self-care, preparation for the changes that occur at the age of 18, as well as managing the transition and choosing a new service provider for adults. 

Stage V: TRANSFER OF CARE

Developing a dedicated and coordinated method of transferring care to adult clinical practitioners ensures the performance of key actions that are necessary to guarantee continuity of care. One of the elements of the fifth stage of the process consists of informing patients and their parents/legal guardians about the form of transfer of care and of medical information concerning the process of treatment so far. Another important element is communication and coordination of care between paediatricians and specialists who provide care for adults. It is recommended that the patients should be transferred before 22 years of age.

Stage VI: TRANSITION COMPLETION

The completion of the transition process with optional verification of the continuation care of the patient in adult care includes verification of the completion of the process, offering paediatric consultations (if necessary), and an evaluation of the experience of patients, their parents/legal guardians, and physicians, related to the completed process of transfer of care. An important element of this stage is closing the process by verifying that the patient whom it concerned receives care in clinics dedicated to the treatment of adults. 

The stages of the organisation of the transition process proposed by Got Transition may constitute a model and inspiration for the development and implementation of actions in various healthcare systems, including the Polish system. The cooperation between different specialists in shaping the policy of the transition of patients is a topic that is addressed by healthcare experts in the context of its implementation in the system of coordinated care. Although coordinated care is a wider structure than the transition process, it is certain that this process, whose aim is to ensure the continuity of highly specialised care for young patients suffering from chronic diseases, encompasses the essence of coordinated care. On the other hand, coordinated care is aimed at improving the accessibility, quality, and efficiency of care, including the quality of life and satisfaction of patients. An integrated system of providing services means “close relations between various forms of the provision of benefits/services”; therefore, implementing dedicated and planned transition processes for paediatric patients in the healthcare system would be an excellent example of coordinated care, and, at the same time, it would constitute Value Based Healthcare (VBHC) [26].

Challenges for the Polish health care system

Even though the practical use of the developed processes of transition of patients from paediatric care to adult care is scarcely discussed in academic literature, the need to create such processes, as well as their potential significance and the resulting benefits, are increasingly often emphasised in the international arena, both by physicians, patients, and representatives of healthcare administration bodies [14, 27–30].  The transition process seems to be a necessity during the treatment of patients with special healthcare needs. Due to that, the challenge, in the form of developing and practical implementation of structured guidelines concerning the transition process, should be tackled as soon as possible, in order to provide patients with continuous, highly specialised care, in compliance with the highest standards of medical practices, including in the conditions of the Polish healthcare system.

An opportunity to improve the current situation of patients with rare diseases has been provided in the National Plan for Rare Diseases (NPCR), whose aim is to ensure continuous realisation of healthcare, that focuses on the needs of patients diagnosed with rare diseases. The plan introduces systemic solutions for health problems in this group of patients. The tasks of the Plan include, among others: improving access to diagnostics and highly specialised medical care as well as the development of information, science, and education related to the treatment of rare diseases. The proposed tool is a novelty in the Polish healthcare system and offers a potential chance to improve the current state of care of patients with rare diseases, among others, by means of designating reference centres and creating a healthcare network.

Although the growing interest in the theoretical aspect of the transition area is becoming increasingly noticeable, there is still insufficient research that would provide practical conclusions for the purposes of applications in this field. In the Polish healthcare system, the subject of the transition process is still a niche topic, which means that it should be further explored to improve the efficiency of the process of diagnosis and treatment of patients with rare diseases. The authors of this study are undertaking further research to develop the transition area in Polish conditions.

Limitations

This review has several limitations. First and foremost, the literature review may not have captured all the publications in the topic under discussion. In addition, all the studies included in this review were written in English, so a bias regarding the language of the study was possible. Moreover, the authors were limited to the area of rare diseases only, and the current literature in the field of transition in these conditions is still limited. Besides, the article presents only one approach to organizing transition care, proposed by Got Transition, which, although it is the most widely used and recommended by scientific societies, could be supplemented with other solutions. Despite these limitations, this review highlights important recommendations for streamlining the transition from pediatric to adult care, which is a huge challenge for health systems and structuring it in Poland would help ensure continuity of highly specialized care for patients with rare diseases, which would affect their level of comfort and quality of life.

Funding: This research was funded by a grant from the Takeda Pharma Sp. z o.o.

Conflict of Interest - none declared


References

1.    Crowley R, Wolfe I, Lock K, McKee M. Improving the transition between paediatric and adult healthcare: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. czerwiec 2011;96(6):548–53. 

2.    Viner R. Transition from paediatric to adult care. Bridging the gaps or passing the buck? Arch Dis Child. 1 wrzesień 1999;81(3):271–5. 

3.    Mütze U, Thiele AG, Baerwald C, Ceglarek U, Kiess W, Beblo S. Ten years of specialized adult care for phenylketonuria – a single-centre experience. Orphanet J Rare Dis. grudzień 2016;11(1):27. 

4.    Goralski JL, Nasr SZ, Uluer A. Overcoming barriers to a successful transition from pediatric to adult care. Pediatr Pulmonol. listopad 2017;52(S48):S52–60. 

5.    McBennett KA, Davis PB, Konstan MW. Increasing life expectancy in cystic fibrosis: Advances and challenges. Pediatr Pulmonol [Internet]. luty 2022 [cytowane 27 listopad 2022];57(S1). Dostępne na: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ppul.25733

6.    Blum RWM, Garell D, Hodgman CH, Jorissen TW, Okinow NA, Orr DP, i in. Transition from child-centered to adult health-care systems for adolescents with chronic conditions. J Adolesc Health. listopad 1993;14(7):570–6. 

7.    Cooley WC, Sagerman PJ, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, and American College of Physicians, Transitions Clinical Report Authoring Group. Supporting the Health Care Transition From Adolescence to Adulthood in the Medical Home. Pediatrics. 1 lipiec 2011;128(1):182–200. 

8.    Hart LC, Patel-Nguyen SV, Merkley MG, Jonas DE. An Evidence Map for Interventions Addressing Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. J Pediatr Nurs. wrzesień 2019;48:18–34. 

9.    Acuña Mora M, Saarijärvi M, Moons P, Sparud-Lundin C, Bratt EL, Goossens E. The Scope of Research on Transfer and Transition in Young Persons With Chronic Conditions. J Adolesc Health. listopad 2019;65(5):581–9. 

10.    Goodhand J, Hedin CR, Croft NM, Lindsay JO. Adolescents with IBD: The importance of structured transition care. J Crohns Colitis. grudzień 2011;5(6):509–19. 

11. H. Gleeson, J. Davis, J. Jones, E. O’Shea, i P. E. Clayton, „The challenge of delivering endocrine care and successful transition to adult services in adolescents with congenital adrenal hyperplasia: experience in a single centre over 18 years”, Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.), t. 78, nr 1, s. 23–28, sty. 2013, doi: 10.1111/cen.12053.

12. K. Freriks i in., „Standardized multidisciplinary evaluation yields significant previously undiagnosed morbidity in adult women with Turner syndrome”, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., t. 96, nr 9, s. E1517-1526, wrz. 2011, doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0346.

13.    Bhawra J, Toulany A, Cohen E, Moore Hepburn C, Guttmann A. Primary care interventions to improve transition of youth with chronic health conditions from paediatric to adult healthcare: a systematic review. BMJ Open. maj 2016;6(5):e011871. 

14.    Erspamer KJ, Jacob H, Hasan R. Practices, attitudes and barriers faced by internists and pediatricians in transitioning young adult patients to adult medicine. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 15 czerwiec 2022;34(3):20190129. 

15.    Okumura MJ, Heisler M, Davis MM, Cabana MD, Demonner S, Kerr EA. Comfort of general internists and general pediatricians in providing care for young adults with chronic illnesses of childhood. J Gen Intern Med. październik 2008;23(10):1621–7. 

16.    Okumura MJ, Kerr EA, Cabana MD, Davis MM, Demonner S, Heisler M. Physician Views on Barriers to Primary Care for Young Adults With Childhood-Onset Chronic Disease. Pediatrics. 1 kwiecień 2010;125(4):e748–54. 

17.    Nehring WM, Betz CL, Lobo ML. Uncharted Territory: Systematic Review of Providers’ Roles, Understanding, and Views Pertaining to Health Care Transition. J Pediatr Nurs. wrzesień 2015;30(5):732–47. 

18.    MacLusky I, Keilty K. Section 12: Transition from pediatric to adult care. Can J Respir Crit Care Sleep Med. 16 sierpień 2018;2(sup1):83–7. 

19.    Okumura MJ, Kuo DZ, Ware AN, Cyr MH, White PH. Improving Health Care Transitions for Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs. Acad Pediatr. marzec 2022;22(2):S7–13. 

20.    Castillo C, Kitsos E. Transitions From Pediatric to Adult Care. Glob Pediatr Health. 1 styczeń 2017;4:2333794X1774494. 

21.    Transition from children’s to adults’ services for young people using health or social care services. [Internet]. NICE guideline; 2016 [cytowane 27 listopad 2022]. Dostępne na: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng43

22.    Practical guidance for clinicians a highlight of updated joint report on transition. [Internet]. AAP; 2022 [cytowane 27 listopad 2022]. Dostępne na: https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/13014

23.    A Guideline for Transition From Paediatric to Adult Health Care for Youth with Special Health Care Needs: A National Approach. [Internet]. CAPHC National Transitions Community of Practice; 2016 [cytowane 27 listopad 2022]. Dostępne na: https://www.childhealthbc.ca/sites/default/files/caphc_transition_to_adult_health_care_guideline_may_2017.pdf

24.    Got Transition [Internet]. [cytowane 27 listopad 2022]. Dostępne na: https://www.gottransition.org/

25.    Six Core Elements of Health Care TransitionTM 3.0. An Implementation Guide. [Internet]. [cytowane 27 listopad 2022]. Dostępne na: https://www.gottransition.org/6ce/?leaving-ImplGuide-full

26.    Kozieł A, Kononiuk A, Wiktorzak K. Opieka koordynowana, definicja, międzynarodowe doświadczenia jako inspiracja dla Polski. Zdr Publiczne Zarządzanie. 2017;15(3):251–7. 

27.    Peter NG, Forke CM, Ginsburg KR, Schwarz DF. Transition from pediatric to adult care: internists’ perspectives. Pediatrics. luty 2009;123(2):417–23. 

28.    University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. JFK Partners. School of Medicine. Transition Webinar Series. [Internet]. [cytowane 27 listopad 2022]. Dostępne na: https://medschool.cuanschutz.edu/jfk-partners/education-training/archived-webinars/transition-webinar-series

29.    Child Neurology Foundation [Internet]. [cytowane 27 listopad 2022]. Dostępne na: https://www.childneurologyfoundation.org/transition-of-care-video-series/

30.    Health care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. [Internet]. [cytowane 27 listopad 2022]. Dostępne na: https://iddtoolkit.vkcsites.org/

 



About Us

Journal of Health Policy & Outcomes Research (JHPOR) is a peer-reviewed, international scientific journal, covering health policy, pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research in Poland and worldwide. The journal is issued under the auspices of the Polish Society of Pharmacoeconomics.

Subscribe to our newsletter:

Latest Articles

Our Contacts

Fundacja PRO MEDICINA
Śliska 3 lok. 55
00-127 Warszawa
NIP 5252390463
REGON 140936540
KRS 0000277843

2017 © Pro Medicina Foundation