0.2
2022CiteScore
 
37th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

Diagnostic scales and methods for assessing the severity of gynoid lipodystophy

  • Copyright
    © 2024 PRO MEDICINA Foundation, Published by PRO MEDICINA Foundation
    User License
    The journal provides published content under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution-International Non-Commercial Use (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.

Authors

Name Affiliation
Szczepańska Patrycja
University of Humanities and Economics in Lodz Profile ORCID
Borzuchowska Monika
Department of Management and Logistics in Healthcare, Medical University of Lodz Profile ORCID
Strzelec Adam
Department of Management and Logistics in Healthcare, Medical University of Lodz
Marczak Michał
Department of Innovation of Merito, University in Poznan Profile ORCID
Kozłowski Remigiusz
Department of Management and Logistics in Healthcare, Medical University of Lodz Profile ORCID
contributed: 2024-09-03
final review: 2024-10-01
published: 2024-11-02
Corresponding author: Szczepańska Patrycja pspatrycjaszczepanska@gmail.com
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this article is to collect and compare lipodystrophy assessment and severity grading methods. Electronic databases, bibliographies, and specialist publications were reviewed.

Methods: Medical databases and repositories of scientific articles were reviewed, including PubMed, Scopus, PMC-NCBI, Science.gov, and Google Scholar. Specialized publication sources were also searched. Based on the collected material, a list of available cellulite assessment and severity grading methods was prepared.

Results: The article presents all available scales for examining the advancement of cellulite changes. Based on available data and scales, it is possible to estimate the actual severity of GLD. Due to the multifactorial pathogenesis of the changes, the selection of appropriate treatment and prevention methods depends on good diagnostics.

Conclusions: The conducted literature research allowed us to select papers published in the selected databases concerning comparative lipodystrophy assessment and severity grading methods. The obtained material will facilitate the selection of proper therapy and contribute to appropriate diagnostics, prevention, and treatment of changes. It will also facilitate understanding the pathophysiology and genesis of GLD.



Keywords: cellulite; cellulite scale; cellulite diagnosis; dermal adipose tissue; pathophysiology

1. Introduction

    Gynoidal lipodystrophy (GLD), oedema-fibrous-degenerative paniculopathy, most frequently called “cellulite” is a severe symptom of incorrect functioning of an organism which causes changes to subcutaneous adipose tissue and dermal compartment, changing the look of the skin [1]. It presents mainly in women between 80 and 98 percent in characteristic locations such as: thighs, hips, knees, buttocks, arms in the form of nodules and thickening of the surface of the skin, sometimes causing pain [2]. Throughout life, a woman's body undergoes various physiological changes. These changes may cause inflammatory relationships that may contribute to the occurrence of various types of diseases, such as: tissue ischemia, physiological imbalances, e.g. glycemic problems, stress, obesity, hormonal imbalances (puberty, pregnancy), menopause, menstrual cycle and body aging [3]. However, in healthy men, cellulite is rare, but may be observed as a result of diseases causing androgen deficiency or prostate cancer requiring estrogen treatment [4].

        The occurrence of GLD in women is related to morphological, biochemical and structural changes. The process of appearance of changes in the course of cellulite develops in subcutaneous adipose tissue and dermal compartment in stages, which may last for multiple months and even years [5]. Despite clear differences in the anatomy between the skin and the subcutaneous tissue and dermal compartment they are both structurally and functionally connected by a network of vessels and nerves and the presence of epidermis appendages [6]. The structure of the subcutaneous tissue is divided into vertical compartments, the structure of which resembles a honeycomb evenly spaced in the tissue, perpendicular to the more superficial layers of the skin [7]. Subcutaneous tissue is formed by adipose lobules interleaved with clearly defined fibrous tracts (reticula cutis superficialis), formed from elastin and collagen fibres placed perpendicularly to the skin surface. The adipose lobules are strongly anchored in the dermis, which connects them with the superficial fascia of the skin. They are located between the dermis and the superficial fascia of the skin and provide a transition to the vessels and nerves from the subcutaneous tissue [8]. Due to the anatomy of the subcutaneous tissue the GLD concerns women. The adipose lobules in women are larger and have parallel partitions. Whereas in men, the partitions of adipose lobules are smaller and placed in oblique planes with small pieces of fat [9]. In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations have observed the presence of papillae in the dermis only in women [10].


Differences exist in the cellular structure of women and men, in different placement of estrogen receptors in endothelium cells, and also in capillaries of muscle cells, which causes differences in micro-circulation. The role of intercellular transport regulator for substances which have an impact on circulation, vasoconstrictive, fibrinolitic and antithrombotic is provided by endothelium [11].


The aetiology of cellulite is multi-factorial. The patophysiology of occurrence of oedema-fibrous-degenerative changes is complex. This mechanism includes the proliferation of subcutaneous adipose tissue, the formation of fibrous partitions in the dermis, flaccidity and atrophy of the skin [12]. Predisposing factors for the development of cellulite include hormonal changes, genetic factors, familial inclination to incorrect deposition of adipose tissue, and insufficiently developed muscle mass [1]. During the first stage of development of gynoidal lipodystrophy changes to connective tissue, microcirculation disorders and stagnation within blood and lymphatic vessels occur, which as a consequence result in increased permeability of the vessels [5]. Insufficient regulation of intercellular transport of substances results in the decrease of vein tension and their expansion, which deteriorates drainage, results in water retention in the body and in oedemas. The increase of the amount of water compresses the adipose tissue, and the adipose cells receive less nutrition [13]. These processes impact the incorrect structure of adipocytes, which are entwined by spreading collagen fibres. The adipocytes are weakly oxygenated due to oxidative stress. This results in the creation of deformed and degenerated adipocytes, which become fibrous and then form nodules in the tissue, penetrating deep into the dermis, resulting in a characteristic “mattress-like” irregularities of the skin [14]. The characteristic for women's anatomy hernias in the dermis were confirmed by high-resolution magnetic resonance examination in the low-density areas of the dermis [9]. Cellulite is a dystrophic process with complex patophysiology with multiple interconnected factors which have an impact through various mechanisms (described above) in the connective and subcutaneous tissue. The disease has a genetic factor, and the hormone estrogen is its trigger, which in combination with other endogenous and exogenous factors starts a slow, progressive cascading reaction [8]. Already in 1920, skin changes resembling “orange peel” were noticed [15]. Today, cellulite is not only an aesthetic problem, but also a pathological condition, a disease which may contribute to or intensify other disorders and changes within the subcutaneous tissue, such as distended blood vessels, micro-varicose veins, oedemas, thickening and nodules appear, which may cause pain. Changes may be also observed in the form of loss of elasticity and flexibility, and in the form of skin flac-cidity [5, 16].


Diagnosing is based on: anamnesis and physical examination, and diagnostics with the use of specialised equipment. When performing an anamnesis, data are collected on the history of diseases, such as: obesity, diabetes , chronic venous insufficiency of the lower limbs in parents, the age of first menstruation, hormonal disorders, number of pregnancies and deliveries, age of the first symptoms of menopause and the use of hormone replacement therapy as well as oral contraceptives [17,18]. There are important questions about the patient's history of weight, rapid weight gain or loss. In the case of mothers, it is very important to know by how many kilograms their body weight increased before childbirth in relation to their weight before pregnancy. Eating habits, fluid intake and physical activity are also of great importance [19]. After an anamnesis is conducted, a physical examination is performed, which consists of looking at the examined area of the body and palpating the changes, both at rest and in muscle tension. The skin appearance parameters, its wrinkling, colour, warmth, texture, the presence of telangiectasias, micro-varicose veins and stretch marks are taken into account. Special equipment or appropriate methods are also used during diagnostic examinations. The assessment involves the use of an anthropometric method, which measures body weight, height, muscle mass and fat mass, and also calculates the body mass index. The thickness of subcutaneous tissue, the degree of obesity and the distribution of adipose tissue are all assessed. However, this method does not accurately assess the degree of cellulite severity [20]. In examining the lipodystrophy severity, it is necessary to use appropriate measurement scales. The classification of cellulite distinguishes four degrees of cellulite development related to clinical, thermographic and histopathological changes, which are presented on individual measurement scales [21].


The aim of this article is to collect and compare lipodystrophy assessment and severity grading methods.

 

2. Materials and Methods:

Medical databases and repositories of scientific articles were reviewed. PubMed, Scopus, PMC-NCBI, Science.gov, Google Scholar databases were used. Specialised publication sources were also searched. The keywords in building database queries were: lipodystrophy, gynoid lipodystrophy, gynoid lipodystophy cellulite, gynoid lipodystrophy therapy, gynoid lipodystrophy etiology, cellulite, gynoid cellulite, physiology of cellulite, anatomy of cellulite, cellulite pathophysiology, adipose cellulite, cellulite diagnostics, lipodystrophy measurement scales, lipodystrophy assessment methods, cellulite measurement scales, cellulite assessment methods. On this basis, a scientific databases search procedure was developed. Electronic databases were searched using Boolean operators. The search concept is presented in Table 1. 

Table 1  Search strategy

Database

Search Strings

Search  Period

Obtained Articles

Articles Meeting  Inclusion Criteria

Pub Med.-

gynoid: "gynoid"[All Fields] OR "gynoidal"[All Fields]

 

 

 

lipodystrophy: "lipodystrophy"[MeSH Terms] OR "lipodystrophy"[All Fields] OR "lipodystrophies"

2012-2022

6

3

[All Fields] gynoid: "gynoid"[All Fields] OR "gynoidal"[All Fields]

[Appendix A]

 

cellulite: "cellulite"[MeSH Terms] OR "cellulite"[All Fields] OR "cellulites"[All Fields]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PMC-NCBI

 

 

 

 

 ((cellulite) OR lipodystrophy) AND gynoid AND ("open access"[filter] AND "last 10 years"[PDat] AND ( "nih funded" [Filter] OR "ahrq funded"[Filter] ) )

2012-2022

4

2

 

 

[Appendix B]

 

Scopus

(( TITLE-ABS-KEY ( lipodystrophy )OR TITLE-ABS-KEY ( cellulite ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( gynoid ) ) 

 

 

 

gynoid ) )  AND  ( LIMIT-TO ( PUBSTAGE ,  "final" ) )  AND  (  LIMIT-TO ( OA ,  "all" ) )  AND  ( LIMIT-

 

12

5

TO ( PUBYEAR ,  2022 )  OR  LIMIT-

2013-2022

[Appendix C]

 

TO ( PUBYEAR ,  2021 )  OR  LIMIT-

 

 

TO ( PUBYEAR ,  2020 )  OR  LIMIT-

 

 

 

TO ( PUBYEAR ,  2019 )  OR  LIMIT-

 

 

 

TO ( PUBYEAR ,  2018 )  OR  LIMIT-

 

 

 

TO ( PUBYEAR ,  2017 )  OR  LIMIT-

 

 

 

TO ( PUBYEAR ,  2016 )  OR  LIMIT-

 

 

 

TO ( PUBYEAR ,  2015 )  OR  LIMIT-

 

 

 

TO ( PUBYEAR ,  2014 )  OR  LIMIT-

 

 

 

TO ( PUBYEAR ,  2013 )  AND  ( LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE ,  "ar" )  OR  LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE ,  "re" )  OR  LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE ,  "ch" )  OR  LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE ,  "cp" ) ) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Google Scholar  

Lipodystrophy OR cellulite AND gynoide time limit 

 

 

 

2012-2022

14

4

[Appendix D]

 

 

 

 

Scence.gov

Lipodystrophy OR cellulite AND gynoide AND women

2012-2022

13

5

[Appendix E]

Total

 

1978-2022

140

42

[Appendix F]

 

Inclusion criteria

    The inclusion and eligibility criteria for the analysis included: adults, female sex. The search included full and review publications, published in the period from 2012 to 2022. Articles in Polish, English and Spanish were qualified. Due to their special scientific value, materials from 1978, 1987, 2002, 2004, 2005 and 2010 were included.

Exclusion criteria

    Exclusion criteria included: editorials, minutes, conference summaries; only free repositories of full-text publications were used.


The literature selection process began with an analysis of the titles. The search resulted in 473 publications. It was noticed that some of the publications received were duplicated and therefore duplicates were removed. As a result, 140 items remained. Subsequently, the abstracts were assessed and 78 articles were qualified for the final, full review in the next stage.


As a result, the list of publications in Appendix F was obtained.

Full articles were checked for relevance. The material was classified by consensus (M. B., P. S., S.A.), which resulted in 42 references. 


 

Figure 1  Scheme for conducting a literature review

 

Grey literature was also included in the review, and 2 items were obtained. During the assessment of credibility of grey literature, the author’s name and the presence of other publications by the same author were taken into account. Sources of the publication and the publisher were also assessed. The confirmation of the facts was checked in other sources. 

The analysis demonstrated that the majority of the literature on the assessment of cellulite includes items from 1978 (Nürnberger and Müller) and 2000 (Rossi). In the included review, 20 titles contained the ‘cellulite’ descriptor and 5 titles contained the ‘review’ descriptor. From the collected literature, 8 titles contained the ‘treatment’ expression.

 

3. Results:

Based on the literature review, the following measurement scales were distinguished:

1.     Nürnberger-Müller scale;

2.     Anatomical and histopathological scale;

3.     Histopathological scale;

4.     Clinical and histopathological scale;

5.     Clinical, thermographic and histopathological scale;

The classification of lipodystrophy changes by degree of advancement is a simple matter. Various methods of diagnosing these changes have been described in the literature. The best known and most widely used division is the classification according to Nürnberger and Müller. In 1978, they were the first to propose a palpation measurement scale related to clinical changes. The scale is based on the degrees of severity of changes, from 0 to 3. They conducted the first studies on human cadavers, with the goal of establishing anatomical causes of adipose tissue disorders. After the conducted examinations, they have arrived to partially incorrect conclusions. The authors have established that skin dimples and irregularities are characteristic to women, not to cellulite. They have also established that cellulite may not be classified, and that it is a characteristic feature of female anatomy, and not a disease. [22]. They investigated the influence of changes in the cross-section of subcutaneous tissue on the occurrence of cellulite in relation to sex. They noticed differences in the structure of subcutaneous tissue between women and men. This differentiation already occurs in the fetal life of a child and is related to the influence of androgens on the activity of fibroblasts [4]. The authors described the formation of hernias of adipose tissue penetrating the dermis, which is characteristic for female anatomy. The dermis partitions in women are much thinner and distributed radially, compared to women without cellulite, thus facilitating extrusion of adipose tissue into the reticular layer of the dermis. Changes in the structure of subcutaneous tissue are located radially and perpendicularly to the skin surface, creating rectangular chambers in the surface layer separated by partitions – ‘fat lobules’ (papillae adiposae), which are protruding into the dermis and the reticulate layer. On the other hand, in men, these partitions are arranged diagonally, creating smaller and polygonal chambers [23]. Due to their anatomical structure, women are predisposed to an irregular and discontinuous border between the dermis and subcutaneous tissue, characterised by the presence of adipose tissue reaching the dermis. On the other hand, the border between the dermis and adipose tissue and connective tissue in men is smooth and continuous. Women have a much greater number of adipocytes, characterised additionally by large size and ability to store larger amounts of lipids [24]. A literature review has not found articles which state that changes may not be classified. What's more, in subsequent years researchers have attempted to find scales that would facilitate the classification of changes and to introduce them in diagnostics. The method of classification proposed by the authors, even though it is not ideal, is still used today in beauty salons, in physiotherapy clinics and medical clinics in order to diagnose lipodystrophic changes [25]. 

Table 2  Visual and palpation scale (Nürnberger and Müller) [12, 22]

Stage of cellulite

Description of the stage

Healthy skin, no dimpling when pressing the skin 

1

Smooth skin in both standing and lying positions

2

Dimpling of the skin visible only in the standing position; in the lying position the skin is smooth

Dimpling of the skin visible both in the standing and lying positions

 

In 2010, changes in the structure of the skin with cellulite were noticed by Tomaszkiewicz and colleagues. They developed a four-level scale which, apart from visual changes, also took into account anatomical and histopathological changes [26]. 

Table 3  Anatomical and histopathological scale [26]

Stage of cellulite

Description of the stage

1

No clear visual changes in the skin, changes in the subcutaneous tissue structure, pathological changes in microcirculation, the surface of the skin is evenly warmed

2

Muscle contraction or tissue compression, which cause local ischaemia and paling, uneven warming of the skin surface (areas with reduced temperature appear), noticeable reduction in skin elasticity, more pronounced disorders in the adipose tissue structure

Depressions of the skin (‘mattress’ effect) are noticeable in the resting position, lumpy thickenings in subcutaneous tissue are noticeable, pain appears as a result of a small squeeze, clear disturbances in the temperature distribution of the skin surface (numerous areas of low temperature), adipose tissue fibrosis

4

Visible changes in the skin surface, as in the case of the 3rd degree changes, but much more intense, adipose tissue fibrosis and inflammation, visible changes in microcirculation.

 

In 2000, Rossi and colleagues described a histopathological method of examining lipodystrophic changes [27]. They proved that the effect of estrogens is one of the main factors causing cellulite changes, because their action dilates blood vessels and increases the permeability of their walls. Fluid escaping from the vessels starts accumulating in intercellular spaces, as a result of which lymphoedema presses on adipocytes. Adipocyte metabolism is thus disturbed and fat cells proliferate. 

The lipoprotein lipase enzyme is affected by estrogens. The estrogens influence the stimulation of uptake and transport of free fatty acids to the inside of the cell, as well as the activity of chylomicron and VLDL (very-low-density lipoprotein) hydrolysis and the release of components necessary for HDL (high-density lipoprotein) synthesis. The lipoprotein lipase is an enzyme which is related to the endothelium in adipose tissue and in the muscles. This enzyme is regulated by hormonal activity. The action of lipoprotein lipase enzyme is stimulated by insulin and glucocorticoids, while the inhibition of the lipoprotein lipase enzyme is provided by catecholamines, growth hormone and testosterone. Additionally, increasing the volume of adipocytes has an influence on the increase of the lipoprotein lipase enzyme's activity, which increases lipogenesis. The increase of lipogenesis releases further growth of adipocytes. The lipolysis process results in formation of lumps and nodules and in fibrosis and hardening, thus resulting in the symptom of cellulite [28].

Lipolysis and lipogenesis are processes that are opposite to each other. They both impact the metabolism of fat present in the human body (mainly in the subcutaneous tissue). When they operate correctly, the homeostasis of the organisms is not perturbed. Biological processes occurring inside the body self-regulate. However, if there exists a continuous excess in the supply of food, or when food is consumed in an irregular pattern, the activity of fat metabolism becomes disrupted and a growth of fat tissue occurs [22, 29]. The increase of lipogenesis induces the growth of adipocytes, causing a change in their shape and size. The process of lipogenesis, fibrosis and hardening of the partitions contributes to the formation of lumps and nodules, with cellulite as a symptom [30]. 

Table 4  Histopathological scale [27]

Stage of cellulite

Description of the stage

1

Tissue oedema, breakdown and changes in the structure of adipocytes, dilation and thickening of the endothelium of venous and arterial vessels

2

Adipocyte degeneration symptoms , hyperplasia and hypertrophy of reticulate and silverophilic fibres, cutaneous and subcutaneous microangiopathy, microhaemorrhages

3

Collagenosis and apparent reduction in the number of adipocytes, micronodules, blurring of the boundary between the skin and subcutaneous tissue, dysmorphism of papillae adiposae, local hyperkeratosis and liposclerosis

4

Disappearance of the typical lobular structure, larger nodules, diffuse liposclerosis, large microvascular changes, atrophic-dystrophic changes of the epidermis and skin appendages, blurring of the boundary between the skin and subcutaneous tissue

In 2011, Zegarska and colleagues described a relationship between the occurrence of cellulite and age, sex and body composition. Based on the literature on the subject, they took into account clinical and histopathological changes in the course of cellulite [31]. They described adipose tissue changes with age, sex and body composition. They performed microscopic observations which demonstrated that the appearance of the skin in the course of cellulite is influenced by degenerative changes in subcutaneous tissue of an oedematous-fibrotic-degenerative nature. This material was obtained using scanning microscopy methods to conduct detailed examination of subcutaneous tissue, collecting of a fragment of tissue from the areas afflicted with cellulite, and using a system for digital recording of images. 

Table 5  Clinical and histopathological scale [31]

Stage of cellulite  

Description of the stage

1

No clinical changes are visible on the surface of the patient's skin (visible during a microscopic examination). There are changes in adipose tissue vessels, and venous and lymphatic stasis occurs. The reticulate layer thickens, the permeability of the capillaries increases, the capillaries dilate, and microhaemorrhages and spindle-shaped microaneurysms appear in the post-capillary venous vessels. Adipocytes increase in size and form small clusters. Intracellular oedema occurs, leading to gradual damage to collagen and elastin fibres, and then to their breakdown.

2

Symptoms are visible ‘with the naked eye’ and there is pain while pressed. There is a visible hypertrophy and hyperplasia of silverophilic fibres around the capillaries and fat cells. Capillaries dilate, microhaemorrhages appear and the thickness of the capillary basement membrane increases.

3

Symptoms visible ‘with the naked eye’, and when applying pressure pain is felt. The changes have a distinct ‘orange peel’ or ‘mattress’ appearance at rest. There is a significant decrease in elasticity, the skin pales and decreases in temperature. There is a visible thinning of adipose tissue. It is a result of formation of new collagen fibres, followed by encapsulation of small clusters of deformed adipocytes, which in turn causes the formation of micronodules and microlumps. Hardening and thickening of the lining of the inner layer of arterioles, dilation of venules, and the formation of microaneurysms and haemorrhages within adipose tissue occur. New capillaries are formed and the border between the skin and subcutaneous tissue is blurred. The micronodules increase in volume and change their shape, fat cells harden and penetrate into the connective tissue of the deep layers of the dermis. Deposits of fibres and the basic substance of connective tissue build up around the accumulated fat lobules, which leads to fibrosis of subcutaneous tissue, and circulatory disturbances are also intensified.

4

All the stage 3 symptoms are present, and collagen deposits are transformed into hard nodules that press on the capillaries and nerve fibres, causing soreness. The nodules are more palpable, visible and painful, and the skin surface becomes wrinkled. The changes are also visible at rest, even after muscles have relaxed. A histological examination revealed a disappearance of the lobular structure of adipose tissue, and adipose lobules are surrounded by highly fibrotic connective tissue, forming numerous nodules. The microscopic image also shows diffuse liposclerosis, which precedes microcirculation disturbances. There are telangiectasias, micro-varicose veins and varicose veins as well as epidermal atrophy. 

 

In 2014, Janda and Tomikowska, based on the literature on the subject, described clinical, thermographic and histopathological changes in the skin and subcutaneous tissue [16]. They explored the causes, prevention and treatment of cellulite. They described factors influencing the appearance of lipodystrophy, hormonal disorders, excess estrogen with simultaneous progesterone deficiency. The phenomena of adipocyte hyperplasia and water accumulation, circulatory disturbances were observed. An increase in pressure in the capillaries causes an increase in the permeability of venous vessels, and slows down blood flow, as a result of which oedema occurs. Insulin, catecholamine (adrenaline and noradrenaline) and thyroid hormones also play an important role in the course of cellulite. The lipoprotein lipase mechanism used by female organism to store fat in the body is responsible for the formation of cellulite. The impact of circulation regulating, vasoconstrictive, fibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory substances on the deposition of adipose tissue is regulated by the lipoprotein lipase enzyme, which is connected with the endothelium [11]. Adipose tissue is present in women in characteristic locations such as: thighs, hips, abdomen, buttocks. These locations are at an increased risk of the presence of cellulite [5]. Differences in the areas of metabolic and hormonal activity of the adipose tissue are also a factor influencing the occurrence of gynoidal lipodystrophy [1]. The catecholamine stimulated lipolytic activity is higher within the visceral fat tissue than within the abdominal subcutaneous tissue, and is the lowest within the gluteal and thigh tissue area. The increased response to mixed adrenergic receptor agonists, such as epinephrine and norepinephrine, of the abdominal adipose cells, as opposed to the adipose cells in the gluteal area is the reason for the formation of cellulite in this area [32,33]. An incorrect diet with excessive consumption of fats and carbohydrates, is also important, causing hyperinsulinemia and intensification of lipogenesis [29]. 

 

Table 6  Clinical, thermographical and histopathological scale [16]

Stage of cellulite

Description of the stage

1

Clinical changes: reduced skin elasticity,

Thermographic changes: foci of hyperaemia clearly surrounded by areas of ischaemia,

Histopathological changes: tissue oedema, breakdown and changes in the structure of adipocytes, dilatation and thickening of the endothelium of venous and arterial vessels;

2

Clinical changes: reduced skin elasticity, pale skin, ‘negative pinch test’,

Thermographic changes: foci of hyperaemia not clearly demarcated from areas of ischaemia,

Histopathological changes: degenerative symptoms of adipocytes, hyperplasia and hypertrophy of reticulate and silverophilic fibres, cutaneous and subcutaneous microangiopathy, microhaemorrhages;

3

Clinical changes: reduced skin elasticity, pale skin, ‘pinch test’ locally positive, presence of small lumps, ‘orange peel’,

Thermographic changes: large foci of ischaemia, ‘leopard skin’,

Histopathological changes: collagenosis and an apparent reduction in the number of adipocytes, micronodules, blurring of the border between the skin and subcutaneous tissue, dysmorphism of papillae adiposae, local hyperkeratosis and liposclerosis;

4

Clinical changes: reduced skin elasticity, pale skin, positive ‘pinch test’, formation of larger lumps,

Thermographic changes: large foci of ischaemia, the ‘leopard skin’ and the ‘black hole’ area,

Histopathological changes: disappearance of the typical lobular structure, larger nodules, diffuse liposclerosis, large microvascular changes, atrophic-dystrophic changes of the epidermis and skin appendages, blurring of the boundary between the skin and subcutaneous tissue.  

 

The diagnostics of cellulite, degree of advancement and clinical assessment of the changes are not easy. The authors adopt many criteria, and choosing one of the scales is not an easy task. The classification of cellulite and clinical changes taking place in subcutaneous tissue can also be made by observation of the consistency of the skin by performing a palpation examination and a ‘pinch test’, i.e., Godet test of lipodystrophic changes [34]. When performing a palpation examination, one can feel the layers of the skin, the boundaries between the skin and subcutaneous tissue, and the presence of lumps in the formation of cellulite, which are noticeable after folding the skin. When performing a thermographic examination, lipodystrophic changes in the form of hyperaemia or ischaemia of tissues that are separated from healthy areas are noticeable [35]. The diagnosis of lipodystrophic changes is most often based on a visual and palpation examination and the use of the scale proposed in 1978 by Nürnberger and Müller. Other authors proposed the use of measurement scales based on clinical, thermographic or histopathological examination [36].

In addition to the palpation and visual methods, anthropometric methods as well as the BMI (Body Mass Index) and WHR (Waist Hip Ratio) measures are used [26].

The articles did not deal with methods of archiving of data obtained during the examination of lipodystrophic changes.

As indicated by studies, electronic record keeping improves the decision-making process, decreasing the amount of work required. Maintaining the documentation on an ongoing basis and storing it on electronic media enables comparison of the undertaken cosmetology interventions. The availability and reliability of electronic devices is as important. One of many electronic systems is “ADPIE-Care Dorothea”, used for the ordering of interventions and for provision of compherensive nursing care [37].

 

 

 

4. Discussion

Based on the lipodystrophic changes listed in the tables above, it can be observed that the diagnostics of cellulite and the unambiguous assessment of the degree of advancement of the changes is not easy. The authors adopt many criteria and choosing one of the scales is not an easy task. The diagnostics of lipodystrophic changes can be divided into diagnosistics of clinical, thermographic and histopathological changes [16, 31, 38]. Clinical changes occurring in subcutaneous tissue can be examined by palpating lipodystrophic changes, observing skin consistency [39]. Classification of thermographic changes can be made by performing an examination with a thermal imaging camera [40, 41]. The pathogenesis of the changes is multifactorial, and determining the exact degree of advancement of the changes is a challenge for modern medicine. In order to choose the right therapy, and implement appropriate methods of treatment, it is necessary to correctly diagnose the type of cellulite. It is extremely important to correctly select diagnostic tools that would enable a quick diagnosis of the degree of advancement of the changes and an objective assessment of treatment progress.

Classic visual and palpation examination methods provide less objective assessment of the skin surface affected by cellulite, compared with non-contact thermography. The visual assessment of lipodystrophic changes is not very precise and neither very objective nor accurate. The physical examination consists of looking at the examined area of the body and palpating the changes, both at rest and in muscle tension. The examination is burdened with many errors, such as: the influence of the presence of telangiectasias, micro-varicose veins and stretch marks on the appearance of cellulite-covered skin. 

Venous changes cause disturbances in microcirculation, which may cause a misdiagnosis in combination with visible telangiectasias or varicose veins. Measurement errors may also result from the variable characteristics of lipodystrophy. People with lipodystrophic changes, may have different degrees and varieties of cellulite, depending on the location of the changes. The visual and palpation examination, despite the fact that it was introduced in 1978 by Nürnberger and Müller and is burdened with such a high risk of measurement error, is still used today to assess cellulite [22]. That is why it is so important to find an appropriate and precise method of assessing lipodystrophic changes. Based on the theory that cellulite is characterised by disrupted circulation, the imaging techniques of laser Doppler flowmetry and videocapillaroscopic thermography are more detailed than the visual and palpation examination of lipodystrophic changes [42]. Ultrasonography of the skin and subcutaneous tissue is a method which enables the detection of lipodsystrophic nodules, assessment of their diameter and of connective tissue structure [43]. The Doppler examination shows the measurement of skin microcirculation, the image of arterial and venous activity, which make the diagnosis accurate, and the detected symptoms of venous insufficiency and images of lipodystrophic changes can be saved in a computer program [44]. The computer thermography examination also enables an accurate assessment of lipodystrophy, by measuring and recording the heat of the skin with cellulite. Lipodystrophic changes show a different warmth than healthy skin. This enables the creation of histograms, which allow for an accurate assessment of the severity of the changes. The use of this method enables early detection of lipodystrophic and venous changes, determining the exact degree of their severity and monitoring the progress of treatment [40]. The use of appropriate, repeatable multiple methods of examination of cellulite changes enables the objective inspection of the degree of intensity of changes and effective use of an appropriate method of lipodystrophy therapy.

Proper diagnosis of lipodystrophic changes is a very important aspect in the selection of a therapy, in order to ensure the chosen method of treating the changes is the most effective and long-lasting. The problem of health is based not only on the correct diagnostics of the changes, but also on the mental and aesthetic comfort of the patients [45]. Lipodystrophic changes negatively affect the self-esteem and well-being of women, significantly diminishing their quality of life. The more advanced the cellulite is, the greater the psychological discomfort of women. The disease also has a negative impact on the patient's health [46].

 

5. Conclusion

The conducted literature research allowed us to select papers which were published in selected databases concerning comparative lipodystrophy assessment and severity grading methods. Afterwards, the contents of the selected articles were analysed. Knowledge of all the scales will enable an accurate assessment of the severity of the changes, and will facilitate the selection of one of the scales, which will contribute to the correct diagnosis and further treatment. The objectivity of results of paniculopathy severity assessment is problematic due to the variability in the occurrence of the changes in the patients. Increasing the understanding of complexity of cellulite pathology and a correct diagnosis of the severity of the changes will improve the possibility of targeted treatment and of further developments in the field of diagnostics in the near future. The clinical picture of lipodystrophy is diverse and, depending on the stage of the disease, a diagnosis of the changes is difficult. The changes are not only of an aesthetic nature, in the appearance of the skin, but most of all they are lesions that carry the risk of impaired microcirculation in connective tissue, as a result of which telangiectasias and micro-varicose veins may occur.

It is important to find a combination of all available measurement scales or to develop one reliable scale in order to be able to properly diagnose the observed severity of lipodystrophic changes. Currently, there are multiple measurement scales that all have flaws, are not objective and do not provide meaningful results. Therefore, from this point of view, it is necessary to develop a new scale, that will enable an objective and repeatable assessment of the advancement of lipodystrophic changes.



6. Supplementary Data

 

Appendix A

PUB MED 

PMC data 20.03.2022 

1.     Friedmann DP, Vick GL, Mishra V. Cellulite: a review with a focus on subcision. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 10:17-23 (2017). https://doi.org/ 10.2147/CCID.S95830

2.     Messina C, Albano D, Gitto S, Tofanelli L, Bazzocchi A, Ulivieri FM, Guglielmi G, Sconfienza LM. Body composition with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: from basics to new tools. Quant Imaging Med Surg; 10: 1687-1698 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2020.03.02

3.     Pianez LR, Custódio FS, Guidi RM, de Freitas JN, Sant'Ana E. Effectiveness of carboxytherapy in the treatment of cellulite in healthy women: a pilot study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 9:183-90 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S102503

4.     Pilch W, Czerwińska-Ledwig O, Chitryniewicz-Rostek J, Nastałek M, Krężałek P, Jędry-chowska D, Totko-Borkusewicz N, Uher I, Kaško D, Tota Ł, Tyka A, Tyka A, Piotrowska A. The Impact of Vibration Therapy Interventions on Skin Condition and Skin Temperature Changes in Young Women with Lipodystrophy: A Pilot Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med:1-9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8436325

5.     Schonvvetter B, Soares JL, Bagatin E. Longitudinal evaluation of manual lymphatic drainage for the treatment of gynoid lipodystrophy. An Bras Dermatol; 89:712-718 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143130

6.     Tokarska K, Tokarski S, Woźniacka A, Sysa-Jędrzejowska A, Bogaczewicz J. Cellulite: a cosmetic or systemic issue? Contemporary views on the etiopathogenesis of cellulite. Postepy Dermatol Alergol; 35:442-446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.77235

 

Appendix B

PMC Full-Text Search Results 30.03.2022

1.     Cañis Parera, M.; Expósito Izquierdo, M.; Cabré Vila, J.J.; Historical Review of Studies on Sacroiliac Fatty Nodules (Recently Termed “Back Mice”) as a Potential Cause of Low Back Pain. Pain Ther., 10, pp. 1029–1050 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00321-5

2.     Leszko, M.; Cellulite in menopause, Przegląd Menopauzalny; 13, pp. 298–304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2014.46472

3.     Tianyi, F.L.; Mbanga, C.M.; Danwang, C.; Agbor, V.N.; Risk factors and complications of lower limb cellulitis in Africa: a systematic review BMJ Open; 8,pp.1-9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021175

4.     Tokarska, K.;Tokarski, S.;Woźniacka, A.; Sysa-Jędrzejowska, A.; Bogaczewicz, J.; Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018,35, pp. 442–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.77235

 

 

Appendix C

Scopuus Search Results 20.03.- 4.04.2022

1.     Abosabaa, S. A.; Arafa, M. G.; ElMeshad, A. N.; Hybrid Chitosan-Lipid Nanoparticles of Green Tea Extract as Natural Anti-Cellulite Agent with Superior in Vivo Potency: Full Synthesis and Analysis. Drug Delivery, 28:pp. 2160–2176 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2021.1989088

2.     Batello Freire T, Michelli Ferrera D., Gil Mendes O, Costa de Oliveira A, Vetore Neto A, Araújo de Faria DL, Rodrigues Leite e Silva V, Rolim Baby A, Robles Velasco MV.; Nanoemulsion Containing Caffeine for Cellulite Treatment: Characterization and in Vitro Evaluation. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci., 55,pp.1-11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902019000218236

3.     Brégigeon-Ronot, S.; Cheret, A.; Cabié, A.; Prazuck, T.; Volny-Anne, A.; Ali, S.; Bottomley, C.; Finkielsztejn, L.; Philippe, C.; Parienti, J.-J.; Evaluating Patient Preference and Satisfaction for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Therapy in France. Patient Preference & Adherence, 11,pp. 1159–1169 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S130276

4.     da Silva RMV; Barichello PA; Medeiros ML.; de Mendonça WCM; Dantas JSC; Ronzio OA; Froes PM; Galadari H.; Effect of Capacitive Radiofrequency on the Fibrosis of Patients with Cellulite. Dermatology Research & Practice, pp. 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/715829

5.     Jianan Li; Paternostro-Sluga, T.; Gutenbrunner C.; Abstracts. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 47, pp. 1–491 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1996

6.     Pérez Atamoros, F. M.; Alcalá Pérez, D.; Asz Sigall, D.; Ávila Romay, A. A.; Barba Gastelum, J. A.; de la Peña Salcedo, J. A.; Escalante Salgado, P. E.; Gallardo Palacios, G. J.; Guerrero-Gonzalez, G. A.; Morales De la Cerda, R.; Ponce Olivera, R. M.; Rossano Soriano, F.; Solís Tinoco, E.; Welsh Hernández, E. C. ; Evidence-Based Treatment for Gynoid Lipodystrophy: A Review of the Recent Literature. J Cosmet Dermatol, 17, pp. 977–983 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12555

7.     Pianez, L. R.; Custódio, F. S.; Guidi, R. M.; Freitas, J. N. de; Sant’Ana, E.; Effectiveness of Carboxytherapy in the Treatment of Cellulite in Healthy Women: A Pilot Study. CCID, 9:pp. 183–190 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S102503

8.     Pilch, W.; Czerwińska-Ledwig, O.; Chitryniewicz-Rostek, J.; Nastałek, M.; Krężałek, P.; Jędrychowska, D.; Totko-Borkusewicz, N.; Uher, I.; Kaško, D.; Tota, Ł.; Tyka, A.; Tyka, A.; Piotrowska, A.; The Impact of Vibration Therapy Interventions on Skin Condition and Skin Temperature Changes in Young Women with Lipodystrophy: A Pilot Study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8436325

9.     Radziejowska M; Radziejowski P; Rutkowska K.; Effectiveness of Chinese Cupping Massage during the Initial Stage of Lipodystrophy (Case Report). Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20, pp.2239–2245 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s3300

10.  Salati, S. A.; Cellulite: A Review of the Current Treatment Modalities. Journal of Pakistan Association of Dermatologists, 31, pp. 500–510 (2021).

11.  Szczepańska, P.; Zakrzewski, L.; Michalska, A.; Śliwczyński, A.; Przyczyny Występowania Cellulitu: The Causes of Cellulite. Farmacja Polska, 76, pp.686–691 (2020). https://doi.org/10.32383/farmpol/132457

12.  Tokarska, K.; Tokarski, S.; Woźniacka, A.; Sysa-Jędrzejowska, A.; Bogaczewicz, J.; Cellulite: A Cosmetic or Systemic Issue? Contemporary Views on the Etiopathogenesis of Cellulite. Advances in Dermatology & Allergology / Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii, 35, pp. 442–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.77235

 

Appendix D

Scholar literature, 15-29.03.2022

1.     Friedmann DP, Vick GL, Mishra V.; Cellulite: A Review with a Focus on Subcision. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 10:17-23 (2017).

2.     Gonzaga da Cunha M, Cury Rezende F, Gonzaga da Cunha AL, Machado CA, Fonseca F.; An-atomical, Histological and Metabolic Differences between Hypodermis and Subcutaneous Adi-pose Tissue. Int Arch Med; 10:1-6 (2017).

3.     Gonzaga da Cunha M, Gonzaga da Cunha A.L, Machado C.A.; Fisiopatologia Da Lipodistrofia Ginoide. J Cosmet Dermatol; 7:98–102 (2015).

4.     Gonzaga da Cunha M, Gonzaga da Cunha AL, Machado C.A.; Hypodermis and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue-Two Different Structures. Surg Cosmet Dermatol; 6:355-359 (2014).

5.     Kruglikov I.; The Pathophysiology of Cellulite: Can the Puzzle Eventually Be Solved? J Cosmet Dermatol; 2:1-7 (2021).

6.     Monda V, Messina A, Palmieri F, Monda G, Villano I, Russo G, Cresctenzo R, Catizzone AR, Fulgione E, Piombino L.; The Effects of Weight Loss on Oedematous Fibrosclerotic Pannicu-lopathy and Body Composition: A Review. Aesthet Med; 3:89-93 (2016).

7.     Nikolis A, Enright KM, Sapra S, Khanna J. A; Multicenter, Retrospective Evaluation of Tissue Stabilized-Guided Subcision in the Management of Cellulite Aesthet Surg J; 39:p.884–892 (2019).

8.     Pavlova V, Paskaleva R, Ivanova V.; Methods for the Diagnosis of Gynoid-Type Obesity and Cellulitis. Varna Medical Forum;6: 264–270 (2017).

9.     Ramalho Pianez L, Silva Custódio F, Michelini Guidi R, Nunes de Freitas J, Sant’Ana E.; Effectiveness of Carboxytherapy in the Treatment of Cellulite in Healthy Women: A Pilot Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 9:183 (2016).

10.  Roubal PJ, Busuito MJ, Freeman DC, Placzek JD.; A Noninvasive Mechanical Treatment to Reduce the Visible Appearance of Cellulite. Cutis; 98:393–398 (2016).

11.  Tokarska K, Tokarski S, Woźniacka A, Sysa-Jędrzejowska A, Bogaczewicz J.; Cellulite: A Cosmetic or Systemic Issue? Contemporary Views on the Etiopathogenesis of Cellulite. Adv Dermatol Allergol; 35:442-446 (2018).

12.  Uebel CO, Piccinini, PS, Martinelli A, Feijó Aguiar D, Matta Ramos RF.; Cellulite: A Surgical Treatment Approach. Aesthet Surg J; 38:1099–1114 (2018).

 

Appendix E

Science.gov.Search Results 15.03-5.04.2022

1.     da Silva, R. M.V.; Barichello, P. A.; Medeiros, M. L.; de Mendonça, W. C.M.; Dantas, J. S. C.; Ronzio, O. A.; Froes, P. M.; Galadari, H.; Effect of Capacitive Radiofrequency on the Fibrosis of Patients with Cellulite. Dermatol Res Pract, 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/715829

2.     Friedmann, D.P; Vick, G.L.; Mishra, V.; Cellulite: A Review with a Focus on Subcision. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S95830

3.     Lopes-Martins, R. A. B.; Barbaroto, D. P.; Da Silva Barbosa, E.; Leonardo, P. S.; Ruiz-Silva, C.; Arisawa, E. A. L. S.; Infrared Thermography as Valuable Tool for Gynoid Lipodystrophy (Cellulite) Diagnosis. Lasers Med Sci (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03530-2

4.     Martins da Silva, C. M.; de Mello Pinto, M. V.; Barbosa, L. G.; Filho, S. D. D. S.; Rocha, L. L. V.; Gonçalves, R. V.; Effect of Ultrasound and Hyaluronidase on Gynoid Lipodystrophy Type II – An Ultrasonography Study. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 15.pp. 231–236 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2012.758374

5.     Pérez Atamoros, F. M.; Alcalá Pérez, D.; Asz Sigall, D.; Ávila Romay, A. A.; Barba Gastelum, J. A.; de la Peña Salcedo, J. A.; Escalante Salgado, P. E.; Gallardo Palacios, G. J.; Guerrero-Gonzalez, G. A.; Morales De la Cerda, R.; Ponce Olivera, R. M.; Rossano Soriano, F.; Solís Tinoco, E.; Welsh Hernández, E. C.; Evidence-Based Treatment for Gynoid Lipodystrophy: A Review of the Recent Literature. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 17 (6), 977–983 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12555

6.     Pilch, W.; Czerwińska-Ledwig, O.; Chitryniewicz-Rostek, J.; Nastałek, M.; Krężałek, P.; Jędrychowska, D.; Totko-Borkusewicz, N.; Uher, I.; Kaško, D.; Tota, Ł.; Tyka, A.; Tyka, A.; Piotrowska, A.; The Impact of Vibration Therapy Interventions on Skin Condition and Skin Temperature Changes in Young Women with Lipodystrophy: A Pilot Study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8436325

7.     Puviani, M.; Tovecci, F.; Milani, M.; A Two-Center, Assessor-Blinded, Prospective Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of a Novel Hypertonic Draining Cream for Cellulite Reduction: A Clinical and Instrumental (Antera 3D CS) Assessment. J Cosmet Dermatol, 17, pp.448–453 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12467

8.     Ramalho Pianez, L.R.; CustódioF.S.; Guidi, R.M.; de Freitas, J.N.; Sant'Ana E .; Effectiveness of Carboxytherapy in the Treatment of Cellulite in Healthy Women: A Pilot Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, 9, pp. 183–190 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S102503

9.     Rodrigues, F.; Alves, A. C.; Nunes, C.; Sarmento, B.; Amaral, M. H.; Reis, S.; Oliveira, M. B. P. P.; Permeation of Topically Applied Caffeine from a Food By-Product in Cosmetic Formulations: Is Nanoscale in Vitro Approach an Option? Int J Pharm, 513, pp.496–503 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.059

10.  Schonvvetter B, Marques Soares JL, Bagatin E.; Longitudinal Evaluation of Manual Lymphatic Drainage for the Treatment of Gynoid Lipodystrophy. An Bras Dermatol, 89, pp. 712–718 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143130

11.  Tokarska,K..; Tokarski,S.; Woźniacka,A.; Sysa.-Jędrzejowska, A.; Bogaczewicz,J .; Cellulite: A Cosmetic or Systemic Issue? Contemporary Views on the Etiopathogenesis of Cellulite. Postepy Dermatol Alergol, 35, pp. 442–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.77235

12.  Tomaszewicz, V.; Bach, A. M.; Tafil-Klawe, M.; Klawe, J. J.; Non-Invasive Evaluation Techniques to Efficacy of Anti-Cellulite Treatment: The High Frequency (HF) Ultrasound as a Useful Imaging Technique of the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 23, pp.72–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2021.1964537

13.  Wilczyński, S.; Koprowski, R.; Deda, A.; Janiczek, M.; Kuleczka, N.; Błońska-Fajfrowska, B.; Thermographic Mapping of the Skin Surface in Biometric Evaluation of Cellulite Treatment Effectiveness. Skin Res Technol, 23 ,pp.61–69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12301

 

Appendix F.

1.     Abosabaa SA, Arafa MG, ElMeshad AN.; Drug Delivery Systems Integrated with Conventional and Advanced Treatment Approaches toward Cellulite Reduction. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol; 60:102084 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2020.102084

2.     Adamczak M, Więcek A.; The adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Semin Nephrol; 33:2–13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2012.12.008

3.     Agarwal AK, Garg, A.; Genetic Basis of Lipodystrophies and Management of Metabolic Complications. Annu Rev Med; 57:297–311 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.57.022605.114424

4.     Akinci G, Celik M, Akinci B.; Complications of Lipodystrophy Syndromes. Presse Méd; 50:104085 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104085

5.     Alizadeh Z, Halabchi F, Mazaheri R, Abolhasani M, Tabesh MT.; Review of the Mechanisms and Effects of Noninvasive Body Contouring Devices on Cellulite and Subcutaneous Fat. Int J Endocrinol Metab; 14:e36727 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3672

6.     Alomairi RM, Alotaibi LN, Al Jamal M.; An Overview with Noninvasive Body Countering in The Management of Cellulite. EJHM; 70:1254–1258 (2018). https://doi.org/10.12816/0044632

7.     Araújo-Vilar D, Santini F.; Diagnosis and Treatment of Lipodystrophy: A Step-by-Step Approach. J Endocrinol Invest; 42:61-73 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0887-z

8.     Atakan MM, Koşar ŞN, Güzel Y, Tin HT, Yan X, Sellayah D.; The Role of Exercise, Diet, and Cytokines in Preventing Obesity and Improving Adipose Tissue. Nutrients; 13: 1459 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051459

9.     Avci P, Nyame TT, Gupta GK, Sadasivam M, Hamblin MR.; Low-Level Laser Therapy for Fat Layer Reduction: A Comprehensive Review. Lasers Surg Med; 45:1029-1050 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22153

10.  Baryluk A, Łuniewska M, Garczyński W, Gębska M, Weber-Nowakowska K.; Anti-Cellulite and Slimming Effect of Vacuum Massage - a Case Study. J Educ Health Sport; 7:215–227 (2017).

11.  Bass LS, Kaminer MS.; Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Cellulite: A Review. Dermato Surg; 46 Suppl 1: S77-S85 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002388

12.  Bauer J, Dereń E.; Standaryzacja badan termograficznych w medycynie i fizykoterapii. Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica, Biomed Eng, 20 (1), 11–20 (2014).

13.  Brown RJ, Araujo-Vilar D, Cheung PT, Dunger D, Garg A.; The Diagnosis and Management of Lipodystrophy Syndromes: A Multi-Society Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 101:4500–4511 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2466

14.  Cañis Parera M., Expósito Izquierdo M, Cabré Vila J.J.; Historical Review of Studies on Sacroiliac Fatty Nodules (Recently Termed “Back Mice”) as a Potential Cause of Low Back Pain. Pain and Therapy; 10:1029 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00321-5

15.  Ceccarini G, Magno S, Gilio D, Pelosini C, Santini F.; Autoimmunity in Lipodystrophy Syndromes. Presse Méd; 50:104073 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104073

16.  Chevalier B, Lemaitre M, Leguier L, Mapihan KL, Douillard C, Jannin A, Espiard S, Vantyghem MC.; Metreleptin Treatment of Non-HIV Lipodystrophy Syndromes. Presse Méd; 50:104070 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104070

17.  Christman MP, Belkin D, Geronemus RG, Brauer J.; An Anatomical Approach to Evaluating and Treating Cellulite. J Drugs Dermatol; 16:58-61 (2017).

18.  Contents. La Presse Médicale; 50:104102 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0755-4982(21)00039-7

19.  Cook K, Ali O, Akinci B, Foss de Freitas MC, Montenegro RM, Fernandes VO, Gupta D, Lou KJ, Tuttle E, Oral EA, Brown RJ.; Effect of Leptin Therapy on Survival in Generalized and Partial Lipodystrophy: A Matched Cohort Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 106:e2953–e2967 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab216

20.  Cortés V, Santos JL.; Clinical Presentation and Treatment of Primary Lipodystrophies. Rev Med Chil; 147:1449–1457 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872019001101449

21.  Cunha M, Cunha A, Machado M.; Physiophatology of Gynoid Lipodystrophy. Surg Cosmet Dermatol; 2:98–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5935/scd1984-8773.2015721

22.  Dettlaff-Pokora A.; Zaburzenia Różnicowania Adipocytów Oraz Metabolizmu i Transportu Lipidów w Adipocytach - Główne Przyczyny Genetycznie Uwarunkowanych Lipodystrofii: Adipocyte Differentiation Impairment as Well as Lipid Metabolism and Transport Problems - Major Causes of Genetic Lipodystrophies. Postepy Hig Med Dosw; 73:741–761 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.6553

23.  Draelos ZD.; Commentary on Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum-Aaes for the Treatment of Cellulite in Women: Results From 2 Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. Dermatol Surg; 47:657 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002968

24.  Emanuele E, Minoretti P, Altabas K, Gaeta E, Altabas V.; Adiponectin Expression in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue is Reduced in Women with Cellulite. Int J Dermatol; 50:412–416 (2011).

25.  Fernández-Pombo A, Sánchez-Iglesias S, Cobelo-Gómez S, Hermida-Ameijeiras Á, Araújo-Vilar D.; Presse Med; 50:104071 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104071

26.  Fiorenza CG, Chou SH, Mantzoros CS.; Lipodystrophy: Pathophysiology and Advances in Treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol; 7:137–150 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2010.199

27.  Friedmann DP, Vick GL, Mishra V.; Cellulite: a review with a focus on subcision. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 7:17-23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S95830

28.  Garg A, Agarwal AK.; Lipodystrophies: Disorders of Adipose Tissue Biology. Biochem Biophys Acta; 1791:507–513 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2008.12.014

29.  Garg A.; Clinical Review: Lipodystrophies: Genetic and Acquired Body Fat Disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 96:3313–3325 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-1159

30.  Gargas, J.; Endogenne i egzogenne czynniki wpływające na powstawanie cellulitu. Profilaktyka i różne metody walki z tym defektem. Endogenic and egzogenic factors of occurrence of cellulte. Prevention and various methods of alleviating the defect (2013).

31.  Gold MH, Khatri KA, Hails K, Weiss RA, Fournier N.; Reduction in Thigh Circumference and Improvement in the Appearance of Cellulite with Dual-Wavelength, Low-Level Laser Energy and Massage. J Cosmet Laser Ther; 13:13–20 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2011.552608

32.  Gold MH.; Cellulite - an Overview of Non-Invasive Therapy with Energy-Based Systems. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 10:553–558 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1610-0387.2012.07950.x

33.  Goldberg DJ; editor. Lasery i Światło Vol. II. Elsevier Urban&Partner Wrocław; (2011).

34.  Goldman A, Wu S, Sun Y, Schavelzon D, Blugerman G.; Gynoid Lipodystrophy Treatment and Other Advances on Laser-Assisted Liposuction. In: Serdev N, editor. Advanced Techniques in Liposuction and Fat Transfer. InTech; (2011). https://doi.org/10.5772/24545

35.  Goldman MP, Hexel D; editors. Cellulite: Pathophysiology and Treatment. Basic and Clinical Dermatology Series. 2nd Ed. Taylor & Francis Group; (2010).

36.  Goldman MP, Hexsel, D; editors. Cellulite: pathophysiology and treatment. CRC Press; (2010).

37.  Guida S, Bovari B, Canta PL, Dell’Avanzato R, Galimberti M, Migliori G, Pellacani G, Bencini PL.; Multicenter Study of Vacuum-Assisted Precise Tissue Release for the Treatment of Cellulite in a Cohort of 112 Italian Women Assessed with Cellulite Dimples Scale at Rest. J Cosmet Laser Ther; 21:7–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2019.1683209

38.  Haneke E.; Cellulite: Fakty i Mity/ Facts and MythsDerm Estet:132-138 vol.44; (2006).

39.  Hebert Y. Cellulite Treatments. In: Pfenniger JL, Fowler GC, editors. Pfenninger and Fowler's Procedures for Primary Care. Mosby; P. 336-340 (2020).

40.  Herman A, Herman AP.; Caffeine’s Mechanisms of Action and Its Cosmetic Use. Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 26:8-14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1159/000343174

41.  Hexsel D, Blessmann Weber M, Taborda ML, Dal'Forno T, Zechmeister-Prado D.; Celluqol® - instrumento de avaliação de qualidade de vida em pacientes com celulite. Surg Cosmet Dermatol; 3:96–101 (2011).

42.  Hexsel D, Siega C, Schilling-Souza J, Hehn De Oliveira D.; Noninvasive Treatment of Cellulite Utilizing an Expedited Treatment Protocol with a Dual Wavelength Laser-Suction and Massage Device. J Cosmet Laser Ther; 15:65-69 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2012.759237

43.  Hexsel D, Siega C, Schilling-Souza J, Porto MD, Rodrigues TC.; A Bipolar Radiofrequency, Infrared, Vacuum and Mechanical Massage Device for Treatment of Cellulite: A Pilot Study J Cosmet Laser Ther; 13:297-302 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2011.630086

44.  Hexsel D, Soirefmann M. Cellulite: Definition and Evaluation. In: Humbert P, Fanian F, Maibach HI, Agache P; editors. Agache’s Measuring the Skin: Non-invasive Investigations, Physiology, Normal Constants. Springer International Publishing; p. 695–702 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32383-1_97

45.  Hussain I, Garg A.; Lipodystrophy Syndromes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 45:783-79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2016.06.012

46.  Ibrahim O, Haimovic A, Lee N. Efficacy Using a Modified Technique for Tissue Stabilized-Guided Subcision for the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Cellulite of the Buttocks and Thighs. Dermatol Surg surgery; 44:1272-1277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001542

47.  Janda K, Tomikowska A. Cellulite- Causes, prevention,treatment. Pomeranian J Life Sci; 60:29–38 (2014). 

48.  Jéru I. Genetics of Lipodystrophy Syndromes. Presse Med 2021; 50:104074. 

49.  Junqueira M Afonso JP, Cardoso de Mello Tucunduva T, Bussamara Pinheiro MV, Bagatin E. Cellulite: a review. J Cosmet Dermatol 2010; 2:214–219. 

50.  Junqueira M Afonso JP, Cardoso de Mello Tucunduva T, Bussamara Pinheiro MV, Bagatin E. Cellulite: A Review. Surg Cosmet Dermatol 2010; 2:214–219.

51.  Kaufman-Janette J, Joseph JH, Kaminer MS, Clark J, Fabi SG. Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum-Aaes for the Treatment of Cellulite in Women: Results From Two Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. Dermatol Surg; 47: 649-656 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002952

52.  Kępa A. Cellulit-Problem z Pogranicza Medycyny i Kosmetologii. Kosmetol Estet 2014; 3:135–143.

53.  Khan MH, Victor F, Rao B, Sadick NS. Treatment of cellulite: part II. Advances and controversies. J. Am. Acad Dermatol; 62:373–384 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.041

54.  Knebel B, Müller-Wieland D, Kotzka J. Lipodystrophies-Disorders of the Fatty Tissue. Int J Mol Sci; 21:8778 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228778

55.  Krasowska D, Rudnicka L, Dańczak-Pazdrowska A, Chodorowska G, Woźniacka A. Localized Scleroderma (Morphea). Diagnostic and Therapeutic Recommendations of the Polish Dermatological Society: Twardzina Ograniczona (Morphea). Rekomendacje Diagnostyczno-Terapeutyczne Polskiego Towarzystwa Dermatologicznego. Przegl Dermatol; 106:333–353 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5114/dr.2019.88252

56.  Krysiak R, Rudzki H, Okopień B. Lipodystrophy: a new insight into an old disease. Przegl Lek; 69:9–56 (2012). 

57.  Kushner RF, Gudivaka R, Schoeller DA. Clinical Characteristics Influencing Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Measurements. Am J Clin Nutr; 64(3 Suppl):423S-427S (1996). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/64.3.423S

58.  La Press Medicale.Editorial Board. La Presse Médicale, 50:104-101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0755-4982(21)00038-5

59.  Lemaitre M, Chevalier B, Jannin A, Bourry J, Espiard S, Vantyghem MC. Multiple Symmetric and Multiple Familial Lipomatosis. Presse Med; 50:104077 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104077

60.  Leszko M. Cellulite in Menopause. Przegląd Menopauzalny; 13:298–304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2014.46472  

61.  Loh NY, Minchin JEN, Pinnick KE, Verma M, Todorčević M.. RSPO3 Impacts Body Fat Distribution and Regulates Adipose Cell Biology in Vitro. Nat Commun; 11:2797 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16592-z

62.  Lopes-Martins RAB, Paretta Barbaroto D, Da Silva Barbosa E, Sardinha Leonardo P, Ruiz-Silva C, Lo Schiavo Arisawa EA. Infrared Thermography as Valuable Tool for Gynoid Lipodystrophy (Cellulite) Diagnosis. Lasers Med Sci; 37:2639-2644 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03530-2

63.  Ludwikowska, B. Skuteczność substancji roślinnych i zabiegów kosmetycznych w różnych stadiach cellulitu i rozstępach. The effectiveness of plant substances and cosmetic treatments in various stages of cellulite and stretch marks (2016).

64.  Luo L, Lane ME. Topical and Transdermal Delivery of Caffeine. Int J Pharm; 490:155–164 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.05.050

65.  Luo L, Liu M. Adipose Tissue in Control of Metabolism. J Endocrinol; 231:77-99 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-16-0211

66.  Mancuso P. The Role of Adipokines in Chronic Inflammation. Immunotargets Ther; 5:47–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/ITT.S73223

67.  Mann JP, Savage DB. What Lipodystrophies Teach Us about the Metabolic Syndrome. J Clin Invest; 129:4009–4021 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI129190

68.  Martins da Silva C, de Mello Pinto MV, Barbosa LG, Dos Santos Filho SD, Valente Rocha LL, Vilela Gonçalves R. Effect of Ultrasound and Hyaluronidase on Gynoid Lipodystrophy Type II – An Ultrasonography Study. Cosmet Laser Ther; 15:231-236 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2012.758374

69.  Migasiewicz A, Dereń E, Podbielska H, Bauer J. Jakość życia kobiet w zależności od stadium cellulitu. Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica. Inż Biomed; 20:217-226 (2014). 

70.  Migasiewicz A, Sobańska A, Dereń E, Pelleter M, Giemza A, Podbielska H, Bauer J. Komputerowo wspomagana ocena skuteczności terapii cellulitu na podstawie obrazowania termograficznego. Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica. Inż Biomed; 23:87–95 (2017).

71.  Mirrashed F, Sharp JC, Krause V, Morgan J, Tomanek B. Pilot Study of Dermal and Subcutaneous Fat Structures by MRI in Individuals Who Differ in Gender, BMI, and Cellulite Grading. Skin Res Technol; 10:161–168 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00072.x

72.  Misbah HK, Rao BK, Sadick NS. Cellulit i podskórna tkanka tłuszczowa: różnice i podobieństwa (Cellulite and subcutaneous adipose tissue: differences and similarities) In:  Katz BE, Sadick NS, editors. Modelowanie sylwetki 3rd Ed. Urban&Partner Wrocław; p. 19–30 (2011).

73.  Mlosek RK, Dębowska RM, Lewandowski M, Malinowska S, Nowicki A, Eris I. Imaging of the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Using Classical and High-Frequency Ultrasonographies in Anti-Cellulite Therapy. Skin Res Technol 2011; 17:461–68 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00519.x

74.  Nabrdalik K, Strózik A, Minkina-Pędras M, Jarosz-Chobot P, Młynarski W, Grzeszczak W, Gumprecht J. Dunnigan-Type Familial Partial Lipodystrophy Associated with the Heterozygous R482W Mutation in LMNA Gene – Case Study of Three Women from One Family: Związek Rodzinnej Częściowej Lipodystrofii Typu Dunnigana z Heterozygotyczną Mutacją R482W w Genie LMNA – Opis Przypadku Trzech Kobiet Pochodzących z Jednej Rodziny. Endokrynol Pol; 64:306–310 (2013).

75.  Napierała M, Muszkieta R., Cieślicka M, Zukow W, editors. Zdrowie i rekreacja ludzi w różnym wieku. Bydgoszcz-Poznań; (2013).

76.  Nikolis A, Enright KM, Sapra S, Khanna J. A Multicenter, Retrospective Evaluation of Tissue Stabilized-Guided Subcision in the Management of Cellulite. Aesthetic Surgery Journal; 39:884–892 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy274

77.  Nürnberger F, Müller G. So-Called Cellulite: An Invented Disease. J Dermatol Surg Onco; 4:221–229 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1978.tb00416.x

78.  Oliveira dos Santos J, Santos Carvalho S, Santos Guimarães AS, Galvão Portugal Passos AC, Matos de Sousa F, Dias dos Santos Í; Lopes da Paixão E, Amaral dos Santos TS, Gonçalves de Souza R, Pereira Fernandes L. Tratamentos estéticos não invasivos da Lipodistrofia Ginóide: Revisão de literatura. Journal of Multiprofessional Health Research; (2021).

79.  Oliveira Modena DA, Nogueira da Silva C, Grecco C, Michelini Guidi R, Gomes Moreira R, Coelho AA, Sant’Ana E, de Souza JR. Extracorporeal Shockwave: Mechanisms of Action and Physiological Aspects for Cellulite, Body Shaping, and Localized Fat—Systematic Review. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2017; 19:314–319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1334928

80.  Pavlova V, Paskaleva R, Ivanova V. Methods for the Diagnosis of Gynoid-Type Obesity and Cellulitis. Varna Medical Forum; 6:264–270 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14748/vmf.v6i0.5292

81.  Pérez Atamoros FM, Alcalá Pérez D, Asz Sigall D, Ávila Romay AA, Barba Gastelum JA, de la Peña Salcedo JA, Escalante Salgado PE, Gallardo Palacios GJ, Guerrero-Gonzalez GA, Morales De la Cerda R, Ponce Olivera RM, Rossano Soriano F, Solís Tinoco E, Welsh Hernández EC. Evidence-based treatment for gynoid lipodystrophy: A review of the recent literature. J Cosmet Dermatol; 17:977–983 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12555

82.  Petti C, Stoneburner J, McLaughlin L. Laser Cellulite Treatment and Laser-Assisted Lipoplasty of the Thighs and Buttocks: Combined Modalities for Single Stage Contouring of the Lower Body. Lasers Surg Med; 48:14-22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22437

83.  Petti C, Stoneburner J, McLaughlin L. Laser cellulite treatment and laserassisted lipoplasty of the thighs and buttocks: Combined modalities for single stage contouring of the lower body. Lasers Surg Med; 48:14-22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22437

84.  Pianez LR, Custódio FS, Guidi RM, de Freitas JN, Sant'Ana E. Effectiveness ofcarboxytherapy in the treatment of cellulite in healthy women: a pilot study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 9:183-190 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S102503

85.  Pieniążkiewicz JM, editor. Cellulit – Profilaktyka i Zwalczanie. Współpraca Kosmetologa z Lekarzami Różnych Specjalizacji. Wydawnictwo Raabe; p. 487-491 (2006).

86.  Pilch W, Czerwińska-Ledwig O, Chitryniewicz-Rostek J, Nastałek M, Krężałek P, Jędrychowska D, Totko-Borkusewicz N, Uher I, Kaško D, Tota Ł, Tyka A, Tyka A, Piotrowska A. The Impact of Vibration Therapy Interventions on Skin Condition and Skin Temperature Changes in Young Women with Lipodystrophy: A Pilot Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med p. 1-9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8436325

87.  Pilch W, Nastałek M, Piotrowska A, Czerwińska-Ledwig O, Zuziak R, Maciorowska A, Golec J. The Effects of a 4-Week Vibrotherapy Programme on the Reduction of Adipose Tissue in Young Women with Cellulite - a Pilot Study: Wpływ 4 Tygodniowej Wibroterapii Na Redukcję Tkanki Tłuszczowej u Młodych Kobiet z Cellulitem - Badania Pilotażowe. Med Rehabil; 22:18–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.0109

88.  Piotrowska A, Czerwinska-Ledwig O. Effect of Three-Week Vibrotherapy on Selected Skin Parameters of Thighs and Buttocks in Women with Cellulite. Cosmetics; 9:16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9010016

89.  Piotrowska A, Czerwińska-Ledwig O, Stefańska M, Pałka T, Maciejczyk M, Bujas P, Bawelski M, Ridan T, Żychowska M, Sadowska-Krępa E, Dębiec-Bąk A. Changes in Skin Microcirculation Resulting from Vibration Therapy in Women with Cellulite. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(6) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063385

90.  Proebstle TM. Cellulite. Hautarzt; 61:864–872 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-010-1986-8

91.  Renajd R, Sidharth C, Kroshinsky D. Cellulitis: A Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management. Med Clin North Am; 105:723-735 (2021).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2021.04.009

92.  Richards K. United States Patent: 11246812 - Compositions and Methods for the Treatment of Cellulite. 11246812, February 15, (2022).

93.  Ring F. The Historical Development of Thermometry and Thermal Imaging in Medicine,. J Med Eng Technol; 4:192–198 (2006).

94.  Roe E, Serra E, Guzman G, Sajoux I. Structural Changes of Subcutaneous Tissue Valued by Ultrasonography in Patients with Cellulitis Following Treatment with the PnKCelulitis® Program. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol; 11:20-25 (2018). 

95.  Rondanelli M, Opizzi A, Perna S, Faliva MA, Buonocore D, Pezzoni G, Michelotti A, Marchetti R, Marzatico F. Significant two-weeks clinical efficacy of an association between Massaciuccoli peat and sodium chloride water of Undulna Thermae measured on gynoid lipodystrophy in a group of overweight female. Ann Ig; 24:369–378 (2012).

96.  Rosales Ricardo Y. Masaje y Ejercicios Físicos En Casos Con Paniculopatía Oedemato-Fibro Esclerótica En La Atención Primaria. Rev haban cienc méd; 13:475–486 (2014).

97.  Rossi ABR, Vergnanini AL. Cellulite: A Review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2000; 14:251–262 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00016.x

98.  Rossi AM, Katz BE. A modern approach to the treatment of cellulite. Dermatol Clin.; 32:51–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2013.09.005

99.  Rubanyi GM, Johns A, Kauser K. Effect of estrogen on endothelial function and angiogenesis. Vascul Pharmacol; 38:89–98 (2002).

100.        Sadick N. Treatment for Cellulite. Int J Womens Dermatol; 5:68-72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.09.002

101.        Salati SA. Cellulite: A Review of the Current Treatment Modalities. J Pak Ass Dermatol; 31:500–510 (2021).

102.        Sbarbati A, Accorsi D, Benati D, Marchetti L, Orsini G. Subcutaneous adipose tissue classification. Eur J Histochem; 54:226-230 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2010.e48

103.        Schonvvetter B, Soares JLM, Bagatin E. Longitudinal Evaluation of Manual Lymphatic Drainage for the Treatment of Gynoid Lipodystrophy. An Bras Dermatol; 89:712–718 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143130

104.        Seidenari S, Bassoli S, Flori ML, Rigano L, Sparavigna A, Vesnaver R, Berardesca E. Methods for the Assessment of the Efficacy of Products and Slimming Treatments for Cellulite According to the Italian Interdisciplinary Group for the Standardization of Efficacy Tests on Cosmetic Products. G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 148:217–223 (2013).

105.        Siemińska L. Adipose tissue. Pathophysiology, distribution, sex differences and the role in inflammation and cancerogenesis. Endokrynol Pol; 58:330–342 (2007). 

106.        Smalls LK, Hicks M, Passeretti D, Gersin K, Kitzmille WJ. Effect of weight loss on cellulite: gynoid lypodystrophy. Reconstr Surg 2006; 118:510-516 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000227629.94768.be

107.        Sorkina E, Chichkova V. Generalized Lipoatrophy Syndromes. Presse Med; 50:104075 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104075

108.        Sulivan T, de Barra E. Diagnosis and Management of Cellulitis. Clin Med (Lon); 18:160-163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-160

109.        Szubert M, Dębowska R, Bazela K, Eris I, Różański L. Zastosowanie Termografii w Diagnostyce Cellulitu. Dermatol; 8:85-89 (2006).

110.        Szydlowska-Pawlak P, Barszczewska O, Sołtysiak I, Librowska B, Kozlowski R, Engelseth P, Marczak M, Kilańska D. Nursing Care Plan for a Newborn with the Defect of Congenital Gastroschisis in the Postoperative Period Using ICNPTM and the Dedicated Software. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 19:3498 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063498

111.        Terranova F, Berardesca E, Maibach H. Cellulite: nature and aetiopathogenesis. Int J Cosmet Sci; 28:157–167 (2006).

112.        Thomas DD, Stockman MC, Yu L, Meshulam T, McCarthy AC, Ionson A, Burritt N, Deeney J, Cabral H, Corkey B, Istfan N, Apovian CM. Effects of Medium Chain Triglycerides Supplementation on Insulin Sensitivity and Beta Cell Function: A Feasibility Study. PLoS One; 14:e0226200 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226200

113.        Tianyi FL, Mbanga CM, Danwang C, Agbor VN. Risk Factors and Complications of Lower Limb Cellulitis in Africa: A Systematic Review. BMJ Open; 8 (7)  (2018). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021175

114.        Tokarska K, Tokarski S, Woźniacka A, Sysa-Jędrzejowska A, Bogaczewicz J. Cellulite: A Cosmetic or Systemic Issue? Contemporary Views on the Etiopathogenesis of Cellulite. Postepy Dermatol Alergol; 35:442–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.77235

115.        Tomaselli F, Caputo MG, Cogliano M, Macali T, Bartoletti CA. Il microcircolo: correlazioni fisiopatologiche. Approccio farmacologico. La Med. Est; 21:p.267–273 (1987).

116.        Tomaszewicz V, Zalewski P, Klawe JJ, Tafil-Klawe M, Kołodziejska K, Cieściński J, Lasek W. Nieinwazyjna ocena struktury tkanek skóry oraz analiza składu ciała osób z rozpoznaniem zmian cellulitowych – analiza przypadku. Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica; 16:341-344 (2010).

117.        Trelles M, Lugt C, Mordon S, Ribé A, Al-Zarouni M. Histological Findings in Adipocytes When Cellulite Is Treated with a Variable-Emission Radiofrequency System. Lasers Med Sci; 25:191–195 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0664-5

118.        Turati F, Pelucchi C, Marzatico F, Ferraroni M, Decarli A, Gallus S, La Vecchia C, Galeone C. Efficacy of Cosmetic Products in Cellulite Reduction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 28(1), 1–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12193

119.        Valentim da Silva, R.M..; Barichello,P.A.; Medeiros,M.L.; de Mendonca,W.C.M.; Dantos,J.S.C..; Ronzio,O.A.; Froes,P.M.; Galandari,H.. Effect of Capacitive Radiofrequency on the Fibrosis of Patients with Cellulite. Dermatol Res Pract p.1-6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/715829

120.        Vantyghem MC, Balavoine AS, Douillard C, Defrance F, Dieudonne L, Mouton F, Lemaire C, Bertrand-Escouflaire N, Bourdelle-Hego MF, Devemy F, Evrard A, Gheerbrand D, Girardot C, Gumuche S, Hober C, Topolinski H, Lamblin B, Mycinski B, Ryndak A, Karrouz W, Duvivier E, Merlen E, Cortet C, Weill J, Lacroix D, Wémeau JL. How to Diagnose a Lipodystrophy Syndrome. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2012; 73:170–189 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2012.04.010

121.        Vantyghem MC, editor. La Presse Médicale; 50:104082 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104082

122.        Varlet AA, Desgrouas C, Jebane C, Bonello-Palot N, Bourgeois P, Levy N, Helfer E, Dubois N, Valero R, Badens C, Beliard S. A Rare Mutation in LMNB2 Associated with Lipodystrophy Drives Premature Cell Senescence. Cells; 11(1):50  (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11010050

123.        Vignes S, Poizeau F, Dupuy A. Cellulitis Risk Factors for Patients with Primary or Secondary Lymphoedema. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 10:179-185 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.04.009

124.        Vigouroux C, Caron-Debarle M, Le Dour C, Magré J, Capeau J. Molecular Mechanisms of Human Lipodystrophies: From Adipocyte Lipid Droplet to Oxidative Stress and Lipotoxicity. Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 43:862–876 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2011.03.002

125.        Vincent C, Szubert M, Dębowska R, Bazela K, Eris I. Zastosowanie Termografii w Diagnostyce Cellulitu. Dermatol  Estet; 2:85–89 (2006).

126.        von Schnurbein J, Adams C, Akinci B, Ceccarini G, D’Apice MR, Gambineri A, Hennekam RCM, Jeru I, Lattanzi G, Miehle K, Nagel G, Novelli G, Santini F, Santos Silva E, Savage DB, Sbraccia P, Schaaf J, Sorkina E, Tanteles G, Vantyghem MC, Vatier C, Vigouroux C, Vorona E, Araújo-Vilar D, Wabitsch M. European Lipodystrophy Registry: Background and Structure. Orphanet J Rare Dis; 15:17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-1295-y

127.        Wilczyński S, Koprowski R, Deda A, Janiczek M, Kuleczka N, Błońska-Fajfrowska B. Thermographic Mapping of the Skin Surface in Biometric Evaluation of Cellulite Treatment Effectiveness. Skin Res Technol; 23:61–69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12301

128.        Wojnowska D. Czy Można Zapobiec Konsekwencjom Menopauzy Dla Skóry?:  How to Prevent Menopausal Consequences for Skin? Menopausal Rev/Prz Menopauzalny; 12(1):69–77 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2013.33425

129.        Wolfe HR, Rosenberg E, Ciftci K, Edgecombe J, McLane MP. Evaluation of Alternative Diluents for Clinical Use of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH-Aaes). J of Cosmet Dermatol; 20: 1643-1647 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14078

130.        Young VL, DiBernardo BE. Comparison of Cellulite Severity Scales and Imaging Methods. Aesthet Surg J; 41:NP521–NP537 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa226

131.        Zegarska B, WoźniakM, Juhnke A, Kaczmarek-Skamira E, Dzierżanowski  M. Cellulit (II). Nazewnictwo, Definicja, Związek Występowania z Wiekiem, Płcią i Budową Ciała,. Dermatol Estetet; 1(72):29–31 (2011).

132.        Żuber J, Jung A, editors. Metody Termograficzne w Diagnostyce Medycznej/ Thermographic methods in medical diagnostic. Bamar Marketing – Wydawnictwo; (1997). 


All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

All authors declare that this research did not receive any research funding.


 


References

1.     Roe E., Serra E., Guzman G., et al.; Structural Changes of Subcutaneous Tissue Valued by Ultrasonography in Patients with Cellulitis Following Treatment with the PnKCelulitis® Program. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 2018; 11:20-25. 

2. Bass LS, Kaminer MS  Insights into the pathophysiology of cellulite: a review. Dermatol Surg. 46 Suppl 2020;1(1):S77–S85

3. Giamaica C, Zingaretti N, Amuso D, Dai Prè E, Brandi J, Cecconi D, Manfredi M, Marengo E, Boschi F, Riccio M, Amore R, Iorio EL, Busato A, De Francesco F, Riccio V, Parodi PC, Vaienti L, Sbarbati A  Proteomic and ultrastructural analysis of cellulite-new fndings on an old topic. Int J Mol Sci.2022; 21(6):2077

4. Friedmann DP, Vick GL, Mishra V. Cellulite: a review with a focus on subcision. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2017;10:17–23.

5.     Salati S.A.; Cellulite: A Review of the Current Treatment Modalities. J Pak Assoc Dermatol, 2021; 31:500–510. 

6.     Gonzaga da Cunha M., Gonzaga da Cunha A.L., Machado C.A.; Hipoderme e tecido adiposo subcutâneo - duas estruturas diferentes. Surg Cosmet Dermatol, 2014; 6:355-359. 

7.     Sbarbati A., Accorsi D., Benati D., et al.; Subcutaneous adipose tissue classification. Eur J Histochem; 2010; 54:226-30. 

8.     Gonzaga da Cunha M., Gonzaga da Cunha A.L., Machado C.A.; Fisiopatologia da lipodistrofia ginoide. Surg Cosmet Dermatol, 2015; 7:98–102. https://doi.org/10.5935/scd1984-8773.2015721

9.     Mirrashed F., Sharp J.C., Krause V., et al.; Pilot Study of Dermal and Subcutaneous Fat Structures by MRI in Individuals Who Differ in Gender, BMI, and Cellulite Grading. Skin Res Technol, 2004; 10:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00072.x

10.     Conti G., Prè E., Busato A., et al.; Proteomic and Ultrastructural Analysis of Cellulite— New Findings on an Old Topic. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21:2077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21062077

11.     Tomaselli F., Caputo M.G., Cogliano M., et al.; Il microcircolo: correlazioni fisiopatologiche. Approccio farmacologico. La Med Est, 1987; 21:267–273.

12.     Rossi A.M., Katz B.E.; A modern approach to the treatment of cellulite. Dermatol Clin, 2014; 32:51–59. 

13.  Rao J., Gold M.H., Goldman M.P.; A Two-Center, Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial Testing the Tolerability and Efficacy of a Novel Therapeutic Agent for Cellulite Reduction, J Cosmet Dermatol, 2005; 4:93–102.

14.  Rubanyi GM, Johns A, Kauser K.; Effect of estrogen on endothelial function and angiogenesis. Vascul Pharmacol, 2002; 38:89–98.

15.  Junqueira M., Afonso J.P., Cardoso de Mello, et al.; Cellulite: a review, Surg Cosmet Dermatol, 2010; 2:214–219. 

16.  Janda K., Tomikowska A.; Cellulit-przyczyny, profilaktyka, leczenie (Cellulite: causes, prevention, treatment). Ann Acad Med Stetin, 2014; 60:29–38.  

17.  Leszko M.; Cellulite in Menopause. Prz Menopauzalny, 2014; 13:298-304. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2014.46472

18.  Schubert A., Czech M., Advancements in diabetes care in Poland, J Health Policy Outcomes Reserch, [Internet] 01/2023. DOI:10.7365/JHPOR.2023.1.6.

19.  Kępa A.; Cellulit - problem z pogranicza medycyny i kosmetologii (Cellulite: a problem combining medicine and cosmetology). Kosmetol Estet, 2014; 3:135-143.

20.  Pieniążkiewicz J.M.; editor. Cellulit – profilaktyka i zwalczanie. Współpraca kosmetologa z lekarzami różnych specjalizacji (Cellulite: prevention and treatment. Cooperation of a cosmetologist with doctors of various specialties). Wydawnictwo Raabe Warszawa, 2006; p. 3-13.

21.  Alomairi R.M., Alotaibi L.N., Al Jamal M.; An Overview with Noninvasive Body Countering in The Management of Cellulite. EJHM, 2018; 70:1254–1258. https://doi.org/10.12816/0044632

22.  Nürnberger F., Müller G.; So-Called Cellulite: An Invented Disease. J Dermatol Surg Oncol, 1978; 4:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1978.tb00416.x

23.  Schonvvetter B., Marques Soares J.L.; Bagatin E. Longitudinal Evaluation of Manual Lymphatic Drainage for the Treatment of Gynoid Lipodystrophy. An Bras Dermatol, 2014; 89:712-718. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143130

24.  Goldman A., Wu S., Sun Y., et al.; Gynoid Lipodystrophy Treatment and Other Advances on Laser-Assisted Liposuction. In: Serdev N, editor. Advanced Techniques in Liposuction and Fat Transfer. InTech, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5772/24545

25.  Misbah H.K., Rao B.K., Sadick N.S.; Cellulit i podskórna tkanka tłuszczowa: różnice i podobieństwa (Cellulite and subcutaneous adipose tissue: differences and similarities). In Katz BE, Sadick NS; editors. Modelowanie sylwetki. 3rd Ed. Urban&Partner Wrocław, 2011; P. 19–30.

26.  Tomaszewicz V., Zalewski P., Klawe J.J., et al.; Nieinwazyjna ocena struktury tkanek skóry oraz analiza składu ciała osób z rozpoznaniem zmian cellulitowych. Analiza przypadku, (Noninvasive assessment of skin tissue structure and analysis of body composition of patients with cellulite diagnosis. Case study). Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica, 2010; 16:341–344.  

27.  Rossi A.B., Vergnanini A.L.; Cellulite: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2000; 14:251–262.  https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00016.x

28.  Siemińska L.; Adipose tissue. Pathophysiology, distribution, sex differences and the role in inflammation and cancerogenesis. Endokrynol Pol, 2007; 58:330–342. 

29.  Atakan M.M., Koşar Ş.N., Güzel Y., et al.; The Role of Exercise, Diet, and Cytokines in Preventing Obesity and Improving Adipose Tissue. Nutrients, 2021; 13:1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051459

30.  Tokarska K., Tokarski S., Woźniacka A., et al.; Cellulite: a cosmetic or systemic issue? Contemporary views on the etiopathogenesis of cellulite. Postepy Dermatol Alergol, 2018; 35:442-446. 

31.  Zegarska B., Woźniak M., Juhnke A., et al.; Cellulit (II). Nazewnictwo, definicja, związek występowania z wiekiem, płcią i budową ciała, (Cellulite (II). Name, definition, relation to age, sex and build). Dermatol Estet, 2011; 1:29–31. 

32.  Hocking S., Samocha-Bonet D., Milner K.L., et al.; Adiposity and Insulin Resistance in Humans: The Role of the Different Tissue and Cellular Lipid Depots. Endocr Rev, 2013; 34:463–500. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2012-1041

33.  Arner P, Rydén M.; Human White Adipose Tissue: A Highly Dynamic Metabolic Organ. J Intern Med, 2022; 291:611–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13435

34.  Oliveira dos Santos J., Santos Carvalho S., Santos Guimarães A.S., et al.; Tratamentos estéticos não invasivos da Lipodistrofia Ginóide: Revisão de literature, 2021.

35.  Lopes-Martins R.A.B., Peretta Barbaroto D., Da Silva Barbosa E., et al.; Infrared Thermography as Valuable Tool for Gynoid Lipodystrophy (Cellulite) Diagnosis. Lasers Med Sci, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03530-2

36.  Szczepańska P., Zakrzewski L., Michalska A., et al.; Przyczyny Występowania Cellulitu: The Causes of Cellulite. Farm Pol, 2020; 76:686–691. https://doi.org/10.32383/farmpol/132457

37.  Szydłowska-Pawlak P., Barszczewska O., Sołtysiak I., et al.; Nursing Care Plan for a Newborn with the Defect of Congenital Gastroschisis in the Postoperative Period Using ICNPTM and the Dedicated Software. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022; 19:3498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063498

38.  Ramalho Pianez L., Silva Custódio F., Michelini Guidi R., et al.; Effectiveness of Carboxytherapy in the Treatment of Cellulite in Healthy Women: A Pilot Study. CCID, 2016; 9:183–190. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S102503

39.  Pérez Atamoros F.M., Alcalá Pérez D., Asz Sigall D., et al.; Evidence-Based Treatment for Gynoid Lipodystrophy: A Review of the Recent Literature. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2018; 17:977–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12555

40.  Vincent C., Szubert M., Dębowska R., et al.; Zastosowanie termografii w diagnostyce cellulitu. (The use of thermography in the diagnostics of cellulite) Derm Estet, 2006; 2:85–89. 

41.  Ring F.; The historical development of thermometry and thermal imaging in medicine. J Med Eng Technol, 2006; 30:192-198.   

42.  Goldman MP, Hexel D; editors. Cellulite: Pathophysiology and Treatment. Basic and Clinical Dermatology Series. 2nd Ed. Taylor & Francis Group, 2010.

43.  Mlosek R.K., Dębowska R.M., Lewandowski M., et al.; Imaging of the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissu eUsing Classical and High-Frequency Ultrasonographies in Anti-Cellulite Therapy. Skin Res Technol, 2011; 17:461–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00519.x

44.  Goldberg D.J.; editor. Lasery i światło. T. II. Elsevier Uban&Partner Wrocław, 2011; p. 93– 104. 

45.  Jahnz-Różyk K, Samoliński B, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Lis J, Polkowska M, Wróbel K, Smaga A, Bogusławski S, Bogusławski S. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in Poland. Economedica AD. J Health Policy Outcomes Res [Internet]. 02/2020. DOI:10.7365/JHPOR.2020.2.3

46.  Migasiewicz A., Dereń E., Podbielska H., et al.; Jakość życia kobiet w zależności od stadium cellulitu. (Womens’ quality of life depending on the stage of cellulite). Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica. Inżynieria Biomedyczna, 2014; 20: 217-226.

 



About Us

Journal of Health Policy & Outcomes Research (JHPOR) is a peer-reviewed, international scientific journal, covering health policy, pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research in Poland and worldwide. The journal is issued under the auspices of the Polish Society of Pharmacoeconomics.

Subscribe to our newsletter:

Latest Articles

Our Contacts

Fundacja PRO MEDICINA
Śliska 3 lok. 55
00-127 Warszawa
NIP 5252390463
REGON 140936540
KRS 0000277843

2017 © Pro Medicina Foundation