Diagnostic scales and methods for assessing the severity of gynoid lipodystophy
-
Copyright
© 2024 PRO MEDICINA Foundation, Published by PRO MEDICINA Foundation
User License
The journal provides published content under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution-International Non-Commercial Use (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
Authors
Objective: The aim of this article is to collect and compare lipodystrophy assessment and severity grading methods. Electronic databases, bibliographies, and specialist publications were reviewed.
Methods: Medical databases and repositories of scientific articles were reviewed, including PubMed, Scopus, PMC-NCBI, Science.gov, and Google Scholar. Specialized publication sources were also searched. Based on the collected material, a list of available cellulite assessment and severity grading methods was prepared.
Results: The article presents all available scales for examining the advancement of cellulite changes. Based on available data and scales, it is possible to estimate the actual severity of GLD. Due to the multifactorial pathogenesis of the changes, the selection of appropriate treatment and prevention methods depends on good diagnostics.
Conclusions: The conducted literature research allowed us to select papers published in the selected databases concerning comparative lipodystrophy assessment and severity grading methods. The obtained material will facilitate the selection of proper therapy and contribute to appropriate diagnostics, prevention, and treatment of changes. It will also facilitate understanding the pathophysiology and genesis of GLD.
1.
Introduction
Gynoidal
lipodystrophy (GLD), oedema-fibrous-degenerative paniculopathy, most frequently
called “cellulite” is a severe symptom of incorrect functioning of an organism which causes changes to subcutaneous adipose tissue and dermal compartment,
changing the look of the skin [1]. It presents mainly in women between 80 and
98 percent in characteristic locations such as: thighs, hips, knees, buttocks,
arms in the form of nodules and thickening of the surface of the skin,
sometimes causing pain [2]. Throughout life, a woman's body
undergoes various physiological changes. These changes may cause inflammatory
relationships that may contribute to the occurrence of various types of
diseases, such as: tissue ischemia, physiological imbalances, e.g. glycemic
problems, stress, obesity, hormonal imbalances (puberty, pregnancy), menopause,
menstrual cycle and body aging [3]. However, in healthy men, cellulite is
rare, but may be observed as a result of diseases causing androgen deficiency
or prostate cancer requiring estrogen treatment [4].
The occurrence of GLD in women is related to morphological, biochemical and structural changes. The process of appearance of changes in the course of cellulite develops in subcutaneous adipose tissue and dermal compartment in stages, which may last for multiple months and even years [5]. Despite clear differences in the anatomy between the skin and the subcutaneous tissue and dermal compartment they are both structurally and functionally connected by a network of vessels and nerves and the presence of epidermis appendages [6]. The structure of the subcutaneous tissue is divided into vertical compartments, the structure of which resembles a honeycomb evenly spaced in the tissue, perpendicular to the more superficial layers of the skin [7]. Subcutaneous tissue is formed by adipose lobules interleaved with clearly defined fibrous tracts (reticula cutis superficialis), formed from elastin and collagen fibres placed perpendicularly to the skin surface. The adipose lobules are strongly anchored in the dermis, which connects them with the superficial fascia of the skin. They are located between the dermis and the superficial fascia of the skin and provide a transition to the vessels and nerves from the subcutaneous tissue [8]. Due to the anatomy of the subcutaneous tissue the GLD concerns women. The adipose lobules in women are larger and have parallel partitions. Whereas in men, the partitions of adipose lobules are smaller and placed in oblique planes with small pieces of fat [9]. In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations have observed the presence of papillae in the dermis only in women [10].
Differences exist in the cellular structure of women and men, in different placement of estrogen receptors in endothelium cells, and also in capillaries of muscle cells, which causes differences in micro-circulation. The role of intercellular transport regulator for substances which have an impact on circulation, vasoconstrictive, fibrinolitic and antithrombotic is provided by endothelium [11].
The
aetiology of cellulite is multi-factorial. The patophysiology of occurrence of
oedema-fibrous-degenerative changes is complex. This mechanism includes the
proliferation of subcutaneous adipose tissue, the formation of fibrous
partitions in the dermis, flaccidity and atrophy of the skin [12]. Predisposing
factors for the development of cellulite include hormonal changes, genetic
factors, familial inclination to incorrect deposition of adipose tissue, and
insufficiently developed muscle mass [1]. During the first stage of development
of gynoidal lipodystrophy changes to connective tissue, microcirculation
disorders and stagnation within blood and lymphatic vessels occur, which as a
consequence result in increased permeability of the vessels [5]. Insufficient
regulation of intercellular transport of substances results in the decrease of
vein tension and their expansion, which deteriorates drainage, results in water
retention in the body and in oedemas. The increase of the amount of water compresses
the adipose tissue, and the adipose cells receive less nutrition [13]. These
processes impact the incorrect structure of adipocytes, which are entwined by
spreading collagen fibres. The adipocytes are weakly oxygenated due to
oxidative stress. This results in the creation of deformed and degenerated
adipocytes, which become fibrous and then form nodules in the tissue,
penetrating deep into the dermis, resulting in a characteristic “mattress-like”
irregularities of the skin [14]. The
characteristic for women's anatomy hernias in the dermis were confirmed by
high-resolution magnetic resonance examination in the low-density areas of the
dermis [9]. Cellulite is a dystrophic process with complex patophysiology with
multiple interconnected factors which have an impact through various mechanisms
(described above) in the connective and subcutaneous tissue. The disease has a
genetic factor, and the hormone estrogen is its trigger, which in combination
with other endogenous and exogenous factors starts a slow, progressive
cascading reaction [8]. Already in 1920, skin changes resembling “orange peel”
were noticed [15]. Today, cellulite is not only an aesthetic problem, but also
a pathological condition, a disease which may contribute to or intensify other
disorders and changes within the subcutaneous tissue, such as distended blood
vessels, micro-varicose veins, oedemas, thickening and nodules appear, which
may cause pain. Changes may be also observed in the form of loss of elasticity
and flexibility, and in the form of skin flac-cidity [5, 16].
Diagnosing
is based on: anamnesis and physical examination, and diagnostics with the use
of specialised equipment. When performing an anamnesis, data are collected on
the history of diseases, such as: obesity, diabetes , chronic venous
insufficiency of the lower limbs in parents, the age of first menstruation,
hormonal disorders, number of pregnancies and deliveries, age of the first
symptoms of menopause and the use of hormone replacement therapy as well as
oral contraceptives [17,18]. There are important questions about the patient's
history of weight, rapid weight gain or loss. In the case of mothers, it is
very important to know by how many kilograms their body weight increased before
childbirth in relation to their weight before pregnancy. Eating habits, fluid
intake and physical activity are also of great importance [19]. After an
anamnesis is conducted, a physical examination is performed, which consists of
looking at the examined area of the body and palpating the changes, both at
rest and in muscle tension. The skin appearance parameters, its wrinkling,
colour, warmth, texture, the presence of telangiectasias, micro-varicose veins
and stretch marks are taken into account. Special equipment or appropriate
methods are also used during diagnostic examinations. The assessment involves
the use of an anthropometric method, which measures body weight, height, muscle
mass and fat mass, and also calculates the body mass index. The thickness of
subcutaneous tissue, the degree of obesity and the distribution of adipose
tissue are all assessed. However, this method does not accurately assess the
degree of cellulite severity [20]. In examining the lipodystrophy severity, it
is necessary to use appropriate measurement scales. The classification of
cellulite distinguishes four degrees of cellulite development related to
clinical, thermographic and histopathological changes, which are presented on
individual measurement scales [21].
The aim of this article is to
collect and compare lipodystrophy assessment and severity grading methods.
2.
Materials and Methods:
Medical databases and repositories of scientific articles were reviewed. PubMed, Scopus, PMC-NCBI, Science.gov, Google Scholar databases were used. Specialised publication sources were also searched. The keywords in building database queries were: lipodystrophy, gynoid lipodystrophy, gynoid lipodystophy cellulite, gynoid lipodystrophy therapy, gynoid lipodystrophy etiology, cellulite, gynoid cellulite, physiology of cellulite, anatomy of cellulite, cellulite pathophysiology, adipose cellulite, cellulite diagnostics, lipodystrophy measurement scales, lipodystrophy assessment methods, cellulite measurement scales, cellulite assessment methods. On this basis, a scientific databases search procedure was developed. Electronic databases were searched using Boolean operators. The search concept is presented in Table 1.
Table 1 Search strategy
Database |
Search
Strings |
Search Period |
Obtained Articles |
Articles
Meeting Inclusion Criteria |
Pub
Med.- |
gynoid: "gynoid"[All
Fields] OR "gynoidal"[All Fields] |
|
|
|
lipodystrophy: "lipodystrophy"[MeSH
Terms] OR "lipodystrophy"[All Fields] OR
"lipodystrophies" |
2012-2022 |
6 |
3 |
|
[All
Fields] gynoid: "gynoid"[All Fields] OR
"gynoidal"[All Fields] |
[Appendix
A] |
|
||
cellulite: "cellulite"[MeSH
Terms] OR "cellulite"[All Fields] OR "cellulites"[All
Fields] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PMC-NCBI |
|
|
|
|
((cellulite)
OR lipodystrophy) AND gynoid AND ("open access"[filter] AND
"last 10 years"[PDat] AND ( "nih funded" [Filter] OR
"ahrq funded"[Filter] ) ) |
2012-2022 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
[Appendix
B] |
|
|
Scopus |
(( TITLE-ABS-KEY ( lipodystrophy )OR TITLE-ABS-KEY ( cellulite ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( gynoid ) ) |
|
|
|
gynoid ) )
AND ( LIMIT-TO ( PUBSTAGE ,
"final" ) ) AND
( LIMIT-TO ( OA ,
"all" ) ) AND ( LIMIT- |
|
12 |
5 |
|
TO ( PUBYEAR , 2022 )
OR LIMIT- |
2013-2022 |
[Appendix
C] |
|
|
TO ( PUBYEAR , 2021 )
OR LIMIT- |
|
|
||
TO ( PUBYEAR , 2020 )
OR LIMIT- |
|
|
|
|
TO ( PUBYEAR , 2019 )
OR LIMIT- |
|
|
|
|
TO ( PUBYEAR , 2018 )
OR LIMIT- |
|
|
|
|
TO ( PUBYEAR , 2017 )
OR LIMIT- |
|
|
|
|
TO ( PUBYEAR , 2016 )
OR LIMIT- |
|
|
|
|
TO ( PUBYEAR , 2015 )
OR LIMIT- |
|
|
|
|
TO ( PUBYEAR , 2014 )
OR LIMIT- |
|
|
|
|
TO ( PUBYEAR , 2013 )
AND ( LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE ,
"ar" ) OR
LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE , "re" )
OR LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE , "ch" )
OR LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE ,
"cp" ) ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Google
Scholar |
Lipodystrophy
OR cellulite AND gynoide time limit |
|
|
|
2012-2022 |
14 |
4 |
||
[Appendix
D] |
|
|||
|
|
|
||
Scence.gov |
Lipodystrophy
OR cellulite AND gynoide AND women |
2012-2022 |
13 |
5 |
[Appendix
E] |
||||
Total |
|
1978-2022 |
140 |
42 |
[Appendix
F] |
Inclusion
criteria
The
inclusion and eligibility criteria for the analysis included: adults, female
sex. The search included full and review publications, published in the period
from 2012 to 2022. Articles in Polish, English and Spanish were qualified. Due
to their special scientific value, materials from 1978, 1987, 2002, 2004, 2005
and 2010 were included.
Exclusion
criteria
Exclusion criteria included: editorials, minutes, conference summaries; only free repositories of full-text publications were used.
The literature selection process began with an analysis of the titles. The search resulted in 473 publications. It was noticed that some of the publications received were duplicated and therefore duplicates were removed. As a result, 140 items remained. Subsequently, the abstracts were assessed and 78 articles were qualified for the final, full review in the next stage.
As a
result, the list of publications in Appendix F was obtained.
Full articles were checked for relevance. The material was classified by consensus (M. B., P. S., S.A.), which resulted in 42 references.
Figure
1 Scheme
for conducting a literature review
Grey literature was also included
in the review, and 2 items were obtained. During the assessment of credibility
of grey literature, the author’s name and the presence of other publications by
the same author were taken into account. Sources of the publication and the
publisher were also assessed. The confirmation of the facts was checked in
other sources.
The
analysis demonstrated that the majority of the literature on the assessment of
cellulite includes items from 1978 (Nürnberger and Müller) and 2000 (Rossi). In
the included review, 20 titles contained the ‘cellulite’ descriptor and 5
titles contained the ‘review’ descriptor. From the collected literature, 8
titles contained the ‘treatment’ expression.
3.
Results:
Based on
the literature review, the following measurement scales were distinguished:
1. Nürnberger-Müller scale;
2. Anatomical
and histopathological scale;
3. Histopathological
scale;
4. Clinical
and histopathological scale;
5. Clinical, thermographic and
histopathological scale;
The classification of lipodystrophy changes by degree of advancement is a simple matter. Various methods of diagnosing these changes have been described in the literature. The best known and most widely used division is the classification according to Nürnberger and Müller. In 1978, they were the first to propose a palpation measurement scale related to clinical changes. The scale is based on the degrees of severity of changes, from 0 to 3. They conducted the first studies on human cadavers, with the goal of establishing anatomical causes of adipose tissue disorders. After the conducted examinations, they have arrived to partially incorrect conclusions. The authors have established that skin dimples and irregularities are characteristic to women, not to cellulite. They have also established that cellulite may not be classified, and that it is a characteristic feature of female anatomy, and not a disease. [22]. They investigated the influence of changes in the cross-section of subcutaneous tissue on the occurrence of cellulite in relation to sex. They noticed differences in the structure of subcutaneous tissue between women and men. This differentiation already occurs in the fetal life of a child and is related to the influence of androgens on the activity of fibroblasts [4]. The authors described the formation of hernias of adipose tissue penetrating the dermis, which is characteristic for female anatomy. The dermis partitions in women are much thinner and distributed radially, compared to women without cellulite, thus facilitating extrusion of adipose tissue into the reticular layer of the dermis. Changes in the structure of subcutaneous tissue are located radially and perpendicularly to the skin surface, creating rectangular chambers in the surface layer separated by partitions – ‘fat lobules’ (papillae adiposae), which are protruding into the dermis and the reticulate layer. On the other hand, in men, these partitions are arranged diagonally, creating smaller and polygonal chambers [23]. Due to their anatomical structure, women are predisposed to an irregular and discontinuous border between the dermis and subcutaneous tissue, characterised by the presence of adipose tissue reaching the dermis. On the other hand, the border between the dermis and adipose tissue and connective tissue in men is smooth and continuous. Women have a much greater number of adipocytes, characterised additionally by large size and ability to store larger amounts of lipids [24]. A literature review has not found articles which state that changes may not be classified. What's more, in subsequent years researchers have attempted to find scales that would facilitate the classification of changes and to introduce them in diagnostics. The method of classification proposed by the authors, even though it is not ideal, is still used today in beauty salons, in physiotherapy clinics and medical clinics in order to diagnose lipodystrophic changes [25].
Table
2 Visual
and palpation scale (Nürnberger and Müller) [12, 22]
Stage
of cellulite |
Description
of the stage |
0 |
Healthy
skin, no dimpling when pressing the skin |
1 |
Smooth
skin in both standing and lying positions |
2 |
Dimpling
of the skin visible only in the standing position; in the lying position the
skin is smooth |
3 |
Dimpling
of the skin visible both in the standing and lying positions |
In 2010, changes in the structure of the skin with cellulite were noticed by Tomaszkiewicz and colleagues. They developed a four-level scale which, apart from visual changes, also took into account anatomical and histopathological changes [26].
Table
3 Anatomical and histopathological
scale [26]
Stage of cellulite |
Description of the stage |
1 |
No clear
visual changes in the skin, changes in the subcutaneous tissue structure,
pathological changes in microcirculation, the surface of the skin is evenly
warmed |
2 |
Muscle
contraction or tissue compression, which cause local ischaemia and paling,
uneven warming of the skin surface (areas with reduced temperature appear),
noticeable reduction in skin elasticity, more pronounced disorders in the
adipose tissue structure |
3 |
Depressions
of the skin (‘mattress’ effect) are noticeable in the resting position, lumpy
thickenings in subcutaneous tissue are noticeable, pain appears as a result
of a small squeeze, clear disturbances in the temperature distribution of the
skin surface (numerous areas of low temperature), adipose tissue fibrosis |
4 |
Visible
changes in the skin surface, as in the case of the 3rd degree
changes, but much more intense, adipose tissue fibrosis and inflammation,
visible changes in microcirculation. |
In 2000,
Rossi and colleagues described a histopathological method of examining
lipodystrophic changes [27]. They proved that the effect of estrogens is one of
the main factors causing cellulite changes, because their action dilates blood
vessels and increases the permeability of their walls. Fluid escaping from the
vessels starts accumulating in intercellular spaces, as a result of which
lymphoedema presses on adipocytes. Adipocyte metabolism is thus disturbed and
fat cells proliferate.
The
lipoprotein lipase enzyme is affected by estrogens. The estrogens influence the
stimulation of uptake and transport of free fatty acids to the inside of the
cell, as well as the activity of chylomicron and VLDL (very-low-density
lipoprotein) hydrolysis and the release of components necessary for HDL
(high-density lipoprotein) synthesis. The lipoprotein lipase is an enzyme which
is related to the endothelium in adipose tissue and in the muscles. This enzyme
is regulated by hormonal activity. The action of lipoprotein lipase enzyme is
stimulated by insulin and glucocorticoids, while the inhibition of the
lipoprotein lipase enzyme is provided by catecholamines, growth hormone and
testosterone. Additionally, increasing the volume of adipocytes has an influence
on the increase of the lipoprotein lipase enzyme's activity, which increases
lipogenesis. The increase of lipogenesis releases further growth of adipocytes.
The lipolysis process results in formation of lumps and nodules and in fibrosis
and hardening, thus resulting in the symptom of cellulite [28].
Lipolysis and lipogenesis are processes that are opposite to each other. They both impact the metabolism of fat present in the human body (mainly in the subcutaneous tissue). When they operate correctly, the homeostasis of the organisms is not perturbed. Biological processes occurring inside the body self-regulate. However, if there exists a continuous excess in the supply of food, or when food is consumed in an irregular pattern, the activity of fat metabolism becomes disrupted and a growth of fat tissue occurs [22, 29]. The increase of lipogenesis induces the growth of adipocytes, causing a change in their shape and size. The process of lipogenesis, fibrosis and hardening of the partitions contributes to the formation of lumps and nodules, with cellulite as a symptom [30].
Table
4 Histopathological
scale [27]
Stage of cellulite |
Description of the stage |
1 |
Tissue
oedema, breakdown and changes in the structure of adipocytes, dilation and
thickening of the endothelium of venous and arterial vessels |
2 |
Adipocyte
degeneration symptoms , hyperplasia and hypertrophy of reticulate and
silverophilic fibres, cutaneous and subcutaneous microangiopathy,
microhaemorrhages |
3 |
Collagenosis
and apparent reduction in the number of adipocytes, micronodules, blurring of
the boundary between the skin and subcutaneous tissue, dysmorphism of
papillae adiposae, local hyperkeratosis and liposclerosis |
4 |
Disappearance
of the typical lobular structure, larger nodules, diffuse liposclerosis,
large microvascular changes, atrophic-dystrophic changes of the epidermis and
skin appendages, blurring of the boundary between the skin and subcutaneous
tissue |
In 2011, Zegarska and colleagues described a relationship between the occurrence of cellulite and age, sex and body composition. Based on the literature on the subject, they took into account clinical and histopathological changes in the course of cellulite [31]. They described adipose tissue changes with age, sex and body composition. They performed microscopic observations which demonstrated that the appearance of the skin in the course of cellulite is influenced by degenerative changes in subcutaneous tissue of an oedematous-fibrotic-degenerative nature. This material was obtained using scanning microscopy methods to conduct detailed examination of subcutaneous tissue, collecting of a fragment of tissue from the areas afflicted with cellulite, and using a system for digital recording of images.
Table
5 Clinical
and histopathological scale [31]
Stage of cellulite |
Description of the stage |
1 |
No
clinical changes are visible on the surface of the patient's skin (visible
during a microscopic examination). There are changes in adipose tissue
vessels, and venous and lymphatic stasis occurs. The reticulate layer
thickens, the permeability of the capillaries increases, the capillaries
dilate, and microhaemorrhages and spindle-shaped microaneurysms appear in the
post-capillary venous vessels. Adipocytes increase in size and form small
clusters. Intracellular oedema occurs, leading to gradual damage to collagen
and elastin fibres, and then to their breakdown. |
2 |
Symptoms
are visible ‘with the naked eye’ and there is pain while pressed. There is a
visible hypertrophy and hyperplasia of silverophilic fibres around the
capillaries and fat cells. Capillaries dilate, microhaemorrhages appear and
the thickness of the capillary basement membrane increases. |
3 |
Symptoms
visible ‘with the naked eye’, and when applying pressure pain is felt. The
changes have a distinct ‘orange peel’ or ‘mattress’ appearance at rest. There
is a significant decrease in elasticity, the skin pales and decreases in
temperature. There is a visible thinning of adipose tissue. It is a result of
formation of new collagen fibres, followed by encapsulation of small clusters
of deformed adipocytes, which in turn causes the formation of micronodules
and microlumps. Hardening and thickening of the lining of the inner layer of
arterioles, dilation of venules, and the formation of microaneurysms and
haemorrhages within adipose tissue occur. New capillaries are formed and the
border between the skin and subcutaneous tissue is blurred. The micronodules
increase in volume and change their shape, fat cells harden and penetrate
into the connective tissue of the deep layers of the dermis. Deposits of
fibres and the basic substance of connective tissue build up around the
accumulated fat lobules, which leads to fibrosis of subcutaneous tissue, and
circulatory disturbances are also intensified. |
4 |
All the
stage 3 symptoms are present, and collagen deposits are transformed into hard
nodules that press on the capillaries and nerve fibres, causing soreness. The
nodules are more palpable, visible and painful, and the skin surface becomes
wrinkled. The changes are also visible at rest, even after muscles have
relaxed. A histological examination revealed a disappearance of the lobular
structure of adipose tissue, and adipose lobules are surrounded by highly
fibrotic connective tissue, forming numerous nodules. The microscopic image
also shows diffuse liposclerosis, which precedes microcirculation
disturbances. There are telangiectasias, micro-varicose veins and varicose
veins as well as epidermal atrophy. |
In 2014, Janda and Tomikowska, based on the literature on the subject, described clinical, thermographic and histopathological changes in the skin and subcutaneous tissue [16]. They explored the causes, prevention and treatment of cellulite. They described factors influencing the appearance of lipodystrophy, hormonal disorders, excess estrogen with simultaneous progesterone deficiency. The phenomena of adipocyte hyperplasia and water accumulation, circulatory disturbances were observed. An increase in pressure in the capillaries causes an increase in the permeability of venous vessels, and slows down blood flow, as a result of which oedema occurs. Insulin, catecholamine (adrenaline and noradrenaline) and thyroid hormones also play an important role in the course of cellulite. The lipoprotein lipase mechanism used by female organism to store fat in the body is responsible for the formation of cellulite. The impact of circulation regulating, vasoconstrictive, fibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory substances on the deposition of adipose tissue is regulated by the lipoprotein lipase enzyme, which is connected with the endothelium [11]. Adipose tissue is present in women in characteristic locations such as: thighs, hips, abdomen, buttocks. These locations are at an increased risk of the presence of cellulite [5]. Differences in the areas of metabolic and hormonal activity of the adipose tissue are also a factor influencing the occurrence of gynoidal lipodystrophy [1]. The catecholamine stimulated lipolytic activity is higher within the visceral fat tissue than within the abdominal subcutaneous tissue, and is the lowest within the gluteal and thigh tissue area. The increased response to mixed adrenergic receptor agonists, such as epinephrine and norepinephrine, of the abdominal adipose cells, as opposed to the adipose cells in the gluteal area is the reason for the formation of cellulite in this area [32,33]. An incorrect diet with excessive consumption of fats and carbohydrates, is also important, causing hyperinsulinemia and intensification of lipogenesis [29].
Table
6 Clinical,
thermographical and histopathological scale [16]
Stage
of cellulite |
Description
of the stage |
1 |
Clinical
changes: reduced skin elasticity, |
Thermographic
changes: foci of hyperaemia clearly surrounded by areas of ischaemia, |
|
Histopathological
changes: tissue oedema, breakdown and changes in the structure of adipocytes,
dilatation and thickening of the endothelium of venous and arterial vessels; |
|
2 |
Clinical
changes: reduced skin elasticity, pale skin, ‘negative pinch test’, |
Thermographic
changes: foci of hyperaemia not clearly demarcated from areas of ischaemia, |
|
Histopathological
changes: degenerative symptoms of adipocytes, hyperplasia and hypertrophy of
reticulate and silverophilic fibres, cutaneous and subcutaneous
microangiopathy, microhaemorrhages; |
|
3 |
Clinical
changes: reduced skin elasticity, pale skin, ‘pinch test’ locally positive,
presence of small lumps, ‘orange peel’, |
Thermographic
changes: large foci of ischaemia, ‘leopard skin’, |
|
Histopathological
changes: collagenosis and an apparent reduction in the number of adipocytes,
micronodules, blurring of the border between the skin and subcutaneous
tissue, dysmorphism of papillae adiposae, local hyperkeratosis and
liposclerosis; |
|
4 |
Clinical
changes: reduced skin elasticity, pale skin, positive ‘pinch test’, formation
of larger lumps, |
Thermographic
changes: large foci of ischaemia, the ‘leopard skin’ and the ‘black hole’
area, |
|
Histopathological
changes: disappearance of the typical lobular structure, larger nodules,
diffuse liposclerosis, large microvascular changes, atrophic-dystrophic
changes of the epidermis and skin appendages, blurring of the boundary
between the skin and subcutaneous tissue. |
The
diagnostics of cellulite, degree of advancement and clinical assessment of the
changes are not easy. The authors adopt many criteria, and choosing one of the
scales is not an easy task. The classification of cellulite and clinical
changes taking place in subcutaneous tissue can also be made by observation of
the consistency of the skin by performing a palpation examination and a ‘pinch
test’, i.e., Godet test of lipodystrophic changes [34]. When performing a
palpation examination, one can feel the layers of the skin, the boundaries
between the skin and subcutaneous tissue, and the presence of lumps in the
formation of cellulite, which are noticeable after folding the skin. When
performing a thermographic examination, lipodystrophic changes in the form of
hyperaemia or ischaemia of tissues that are separated from healthy areas are
noticeable [35]. The diagnosis of lipodystrophic changes is most often based on
a visual and palpation examination and the use of the scale proposed in 1978 by
Nürnberger and Müller. Other authors proposed the use of measurement
scales based on clinical, thermographic or histopathological examination [36].
In addition
to the palpation and visual methods, anthropometric methods as well as the BMI
(Body Mass Index) and WHR (Waist Hip Ratio) measures are used [26].
The
articles did not deal with methods of archiving of data obtained during the
examination of lipodystrophic changes.
As
indicated by studies, electronic record keeping improves the decision-making
process, decreasing the amount of work required. Maintaining the documentation
on an ongoing basis and storing it on electronic media enables comparison of
the undertaken cosmetology interventions. The availability and reliability of
electronic devices is as important. One of many electronic systems is
“ADPIE-Care Dorothea”, used for the ordering of interventions and for provision
of compherensive nursing care [37].
4.
Discussion
Based on
the lipodystrophic changes listed in the tables above, it can be observed that
the diagnostics of cellulite and the unambiguous assessment of the degree of
advancement of the changes is not easy. The authors adopt many criteria and
choosing one of the scales is not an easy task. The diagnostics of
lipodystrophic changes can be divided into diagnosistics of clinical,
thermographic and histopathological changes [16, 31, 38]. Clinical changes
occurring in subcutaneous tissue can be examined by palpating lipodystrophic
changes, observing skin consistency [39]. Classification of thermographic
changes can be made by performing an examination with a thermal imaging camera
[40, 41]. The pathogenesis of the changes is multifactorial, and determining
the exact degree of advancement of the changes is a challenge for modern
medicine. In order to choose the right therapy, and implement appropriate
methods of treatment, it is necessary to correctly diagnose the type of
cellulite. It is extremely important to correctly select diagnostic tools that
would enable a quick diagnosis of the degree of advancement of the changes and
an objective assessment of treatment progress.
Classic
visual and palpation examination methods provide less objective assessment of
the skin surface affected by cellulite, compared with non-contact thermography.
The visual assessment of lipodystrophic changes is not very precise and neither
very objective nor accurate. The physical examination consists of looking at
the examined area of the body and palpating the changes, both at rest and in
muscle tension. The examination is burdened with many errors, such as: the
influence of the presence of telangiectasias, micro-varicose veins and stretch
marks on the appearance of cellulite-covered skin.
Venous
changes cause disturbances in microcirculation, which may cause a misdiagnosis
in combination with visible telangiectasias or varicose veins. Measurement
errors may also result from the variable characteristics of lipodystrophy.
People with lipodystrophic changes, may have different degrees and varieties of
cellulite, depending on the location of the changes. The visual and palpation
examination, despite the fact that it was introduced in 1978 by Nürnberger and
Müller and is burdened with such a high risk of measurement error, is still
used today to assess cellulite [22]. That is why it is so important to find an
appropriate and precise method of assessing lipodystrophic changes. Based on
the theory that cellulite is characterised by disrupted circulation, the
imaging techniques of laser Doppler flowmetry and videocapillaroscopic
thermography are more detailed than the visual and palpation examination of
lipodystrophic changes [42]. Ultrasonography of the skin and subcutaneous
tissue is a method which enables the detection of lipodsystrophic nodules,
assessment of their diameter and of connective tissue structure [43]. The
Doppler examination shows the measurement of skin microcirculation, the image
of arterial and venous activity, which make the diagnosis accurate, and the
detected symptoms of venous insufficiency and images of lipodystrophic changes
can be saved in a computer program [44]. The computer thermography examination
also enables an accurate assessment of lipodystrophy, by measuring and
recording the heat of the skin with cellulite. Lipodystrophic changes show a
different warmth than healthy skin. This enables the creation of histograms,
which allow for an accurate assessment of the severity of the changes. The use
of this method enables early detection of lipodystrophic and venous changes,
determining the exact degree of their severity and monitoring the progress of
treatment [40]. The use of appropriate, repeatable multiple methods of
examination of cellulite changes enables the objective inspection of the degree
of intensity of changes and effective use of an appropriate method of
lipodystrophy therapy.
Proper
diagnosis of lipodystrophic changes is a very important aspect in the selection
of a therapy, in order to ensure the chosen method of treating the changes is
the most effective and long-lasting. The problem of health is based not only on
the correct diagnostics of the changes, but also on the mental and aesthetic
comfort of the patients [45]. Lipodystrophic changes negatively affect the
self-esteem and well-being of women, significantly diminishing their quality of
life. The more advanced the cellulite is, the greater the psychological
discomfort of women. The disease also has a negative impact on the
patient's health [46].
5.
Conclusion
The
conducted literature research allowed us to select papers which were published
in selected databases concerning comparative lipodystrophy assessment and
severity grading methods. Afterwards, the contents of the selected articles
were analysed. Knowledge of all the scales will enable an accurate assessment
of the severity of the changes, and will facilitate the selection of one of the
scales, which will contribute to the correct diagnosis and further treatment.
The objectivity of results of paniculopathy severity assessment is problematic
due to the variability in the occurrence of the changes in the patients.
Increasing the understanding of complexity of cellulite pathology and a correct
diagnosis of the severity of the changes will improve the possibility of
targeted treatment and of further developments in the field of diagnostics in
the near future. The clinical picture of lipodystrophy is diverse and,
depending on the stage of the disease, a diagnosis of the changes is difficult.
The changes are not only of an aesthetic nature, in the appearance of the skin,
but most of all they are lesions that carry the risk of impaired microcirculation
in connective tissue, as a result of which telangiectasias and micro-varicose
veins may occur.
It is
important to find a combination of all available measurement scales or to
develop one reliable scale in order to be able to properly diagnose the
observed severity of lipodystrophic changes. Currently, there are multiple
measurement scales that all have flaws, are not objective and do not provide
meaningful results. Therefore, from this point of view, it is necessary to
develop a new scale, that will enable an objective and repeatable assessment of
the advancement of lipodystrophic changes.
6.
Supplementary Data
Appendix
A
PUB
MED
PMC data
20.03.2022
1. Friedmann
DP, Vick GL, Mishra V. Cellulite: a review with a focus on subcision. Clin
Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 10:17-23 (2017). https://doi.org/ 10.2147/CCID.S95830
2. Messina
C, Albano D, Gitto S, Tofanelli L, Bazzocchi A, Ulivieri FM, Guglielmi G,
Sconfienza LM. Body composition with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: from
basics to new tools. Quant Imaging Med Surg; 10: 1687-1698 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2020.03.02
3. Pianez
LR, Custódio FS, Guidi RM, de Freitas JN, Sant'Ana E. Effectiveness of
carboxytherapy in the treatment of cellulite in healthy women: a pilot study.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 9:183-90 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S102503
4. Pilch
W, Czerwińska-Ledwig O, Chitryniewicz-Rostek J, Nastałek M, Krężałek P,
Jędry-chowska D, Totko-Borkusewicz N, Uher I, Kaško D, Tota Ł, Tyka A, Tyka A,
Piotrowska A. The Impact of Vibration Therapy Interventions on Skin Condition
and Skin Temperature Changes in Young Women with Lipodystrophy: A Pilot Study.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med:1-9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8436325
5. Schonvvetter
B, Soares JL, Bagatin E. Longitudinal evaluation of manual lymphatic drainage
for the treatment of gynoid lipodystrophy. An Bras Dermatol; 89:712-718
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143130
6. Tokarska
K, Tokarski S, Woźniacka A, Sysa-Jędrzejowska A, Bogaczewicz J. Cellulite: a
cosmetic or systemic issue? Contemporary views on the etiopathogenesis of cellulite. Postepy Dermatol
Alergol; 35:442-446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.77235
Appendix
B
PMC
Full-Text Search Results 30.03.2022
1. Cañis Parera, M.; Expósito Izquierdo, M.; Cabré Vila,
J.J.; Historical Review of Studies on Sacroiliac Fatty Nodules (Recently Termed
“Back Mice”) as a Potential Cause of Low Back Pain. Pain Ther., 10, pp.
1029–1050 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00321-5
2. Leszko,
M.; Cellulite in menopause, Przegląd Menopauzalny; 13, pp. 298–304
(2014). https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2014.46472
3. Tianyi,
F.L.; Mbanga, C.M.; Danwang, C.; Agbor, V.N.; Risk factors and complications of
lower limb cellulitis in Africa: a systematic review BMJ Open; 8,pp.1-9
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021175
4. Tokarska, K.;Tokarski,
S.;Woźniacka, A.; Sysa-Jędrzejowska, A.; Bogaczewicz, J.; Postepy Dermatol
Alergol. 2018,35, pp. 442–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.77235
Appendix
C
Scopuus
Search Results 20.03.- 4.04.2022
1. Abosabaa,
S. A.; Arafa, M. G.; ElMeshad, A. N.; Hybrid Chitosan-Lipid Nanoparticles of
Green Tea Extract as Natural Anti-Cellulite Agent with Superior in Vivo
Potency: Full Synthesis and Analysis. Drug Delivery, 28:pp. 2160–2176
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2021.1989088
2. Batello Freire T, Michelli Ferrera
D., Gil Mendes O, Costa de Oliveira A, Vetore Neto A, Araújo de Faria DL,
Rodrigues Leite e Silva V, Rolim Baby A, Robles Velasco MV.; Nanoemulsion
Containing Caffeine for Cellulite Treatment: Characterization and in Vitro
Evaluation. Braz.
J. Pharm. Sci., 55,pp.1-11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902019000218236
3. Brégigeon-Ronot,
S.; Cheret, A.; Cabié, A.; Prazuck, T.; Volny-Anne, A.; Ali, S.; Bottomley, C.;
Finkielsztejn, L.; Philippe, C.; Parienti, J.-J.; Evaluating Patient Preference
and Satisfaction for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Therapy in France. Patient Preference
& Adherence, 11,pp. 1159–1169 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S130276
4. da
Silva RMV; Barichello PA; Medeiros ML.; de Mendonça WCM; Dantas JSC; Ronzio OA;
Froes PM; Galadari H.; Effect of Capacitive Radiofrequency on the Fibrosis of
Patients with Cellulite. Dermatology Research & Practice, pp. 1–6
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/715829
5. Jianan
Li; Paternostro-Sluga, T.; Gutenbrunner C.; Abstracts. Journal of
rehabilitation medicine, 47, pp. 1–491 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1996
6. Pérez Atamoros, F. M.; Alcalá Pérez,
D.; Asz Sigall, D.; Ávila Romay, A. A.; Barba Gastelum, J. A.; de la Peña
Salcedo, J. A.; Escalante Salgado, P. E.; Gallardo Palacios, G. J.;
Guerrero-Gonzalez, G. A.; Morales De la Cerda, R.; Ponce Olivera, R. M.; Rossano
Soriano, F.; Solís Tinoco, E.; Welsh Hernández, E. C. ; Evidence-Based
Treatment for Gynoid Lipodystrophy: A Review of the Recent Literature. J Cosmet Dermatol, 17, pp. 977–983
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12555
7. Pianez,
L. R.; Custódio, F. S.; Guidi, R. M.; Freitas, J. N. de; Sant’Ana, E.;
Effectiveness of Carboxytherapy in the Treatment of Cellulite in Healthy Women:
A Pilot Study. CCID, 9:pp. 183–190 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S102503
8. Pilch,
W.; Czerwińska-Ledwig, O.; Chitryniewicz-Rostek, J.; Nastałek, M.; Krężałek,
P.; Jędrychowska, D.; Totko-Borkusewicz, N.; Uher, I.; Kaško, D.; Tota, Ł.;
Tyka, A.; Tyka, A.; Piotrowska, A.; The Impact of Vibration Therapy
Interventions on Skin Condition and Skin Temperature Changes in Young Women
with Lipodystrophy: A Pilot Study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative
Medicine (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8436325
9. Radziejowska
M; Radziejowski P; Rutkowska K.; Effectiveness of Chinese Cupping Massage
during the Initial Stage of Lipodystrophy (Case Report). Journal of Physical
Education and Sport, 20, pp.2239–2245 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s3300
10. Salati,
S. A.; Cellulite: A Review of the Current Treatment Modalities. Journal of
Pakistan Association of Dermatologists, 31, pp. 500–510 (2021).
11. Szczepańska, P.; Zakrzewski, L.; Michalska,
A.; Śliwczyński, A.; Przyczyny Występowania Cellulitu : The Causes of Cellulite. Farmacja Polska, 76,
pp.686–691 (2020). https://doi.org/10.32383/farmpol/132457
12. Tokarska,
K.; Tokarski, S.; Woźniacka, A.; Sysa-Jędrzejowska, A.; Bogaczewicz, J.;
Cellulite: A Cosmetic or Systemic Issue? Contemporary Views on the Etiopathogenesis of
Cellulite. Advances in Dermatology & Allergology / Postępy Dermatologii i
Alergologii, 35, pp. 442–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.77235
Appendix
D
Scholar
literature, 15-29.03.2022
1. Friedmann
DP, Vick GL, Mishra V.; Cellulite: A Review with a Focus on Subcision. Clin
Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 10:17-23 (2017).
2. Gonzaga
da Cunha M, Cury Rezende F, Gonzaga da Cunha AL, Machado CA, Fonseca F.;
An-atomical, Histological and Metabolic Differences between Hypodermis and
Subcutaneous Adi-pose Tissue. Int Arch Med; 10:1-6 (2017).
3. Gonzaga da Cunha M, Gonzaga da Cunha A.L,
Machado C.A.; Fisiopatologia Da Lipodistrofia Ginoide. J Cosmet
Dermatol; 7:98–102 (2015).
4. Gonzaga da Cunha M, Gonzaga da Cunha
AL, Machado C.A.; Hypodermis and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue-Two Different
Structures. Surg
Cosmet Dermatol; 6:355-359 (2014).
5. Kruglikov
I.; The Pathophysiology of Cellulite: Can the Puzzle Eventually Be Solved? J
Cosmet Dermatol; 2:1-7 (2021).
6. Monda
V, Messina A, Palmieri F, Monda G, Villano I, Russo G, Cresctenzo R, Catizzone
AR, Fulgione E, Piombino L.; The Effects of Weight Loss on Oedematous
Fibrosclerotic Pannicu-lopathy and Body Composition: A Review. Aesthet Med;
3:89-93 (2016).
7. Nikolis
A, Enright KM, Sapra S, Khanna J. A; Multicenter, Retrospective Evaluation of
Tissue Stabilized-Guided Subcision in the Management of Cellulite Aesthet Surg
J; 39:p.884–892 (2019).
8. Pavlova
V, Paskaleva R, Ivanova V.; Methods for the Diagnosis of Gynoid-Type Obesity
and Cellulitis. Varna Medical Forum;6: 264–270 (2017).
9. Ramalho
Pianez L, Silva Custódio F, Michelini Guidi R, Nunes de Freitas J, Sant’Ana E.;
Effectiveness of Carboxytherapy in the Treatment of Cellulite in Healthy Women:
A Pilot Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 9:183 (2016).
10. Roubal
PJ, Busuito MJ, Freeman DC, Placzek JD.; A Noninvasive Mechanical Treatment to
Reduce the Visible Appearance of Cellulite. Cutis; 98:393–398 (2016).
11. Tokarska
K, Tokarski S, Woźniacka A, Sysa-Jędrzejowska A, Bogaczewicz J.; Cellulite: A
Cosmetic or Systemic Issue? Contemporary Views on the Etiopathogenesis of Cellulite. Adv Dermatol
Allergol; 35:442-446 (2018).
12. Uebel
CO, Piccinini, PS, Martinelli A, Feijó Aguiar D, Matta Ramos RF.; Cellulite: A
Surgical Treatment Approach. Aesthet Surg J; 38:1099–1114 (2018).
Appendix
E
Science.gov.Search
Results 15.03-5.04.2022
1. da
Silva, R. M.V.; Barichello, P. A.; Medeiros, M. L.; de Mendonça, W. C.M.;
Dantas, J. S. C.; Ronzio, O. A.; Froes, P. M.; Galadari, H.; Effect of
Capacitive Radiofrequency on the Fibrosis of Patients with Cellulite. Dermatol
Res Pract, 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/715829
2. Friedmann,
D.P; Vick, G.L.; Mishra, V.; Cellulite: A Review with a Focus on Subcision.
Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S95830
3. Lopes-Martins, R. A. B.; Barbaroto,
D. P.; Da Silva Barbosa, E.; Leonardo, P. S.; Ruiz-Silva, C.; Arisawa, E. A. L.
S.; Infrared Thermography as Valuable Tool for Gynoid Lipodystrophy (Cellulite)
Diagnosis. Lasers
Med Sci (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03530-2
4. Martins
da Silva, C. M.; de Mello Pinto, M. V.; Barbosa, L. G.; Filho, S. D. D. S.;
Rocha, L. L. V.; Gonçalves, R. V.; Effect of Ultrasound and Hyaluronidase on
Gynoid Lipodystrophy Type II – An Ultrasonography Study. Journal of Cosmetic
and Laser Therapy, 15.pp. 231–236 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2012.758374
5. Pérez Atamoros, F. M.; Alcalá Pérez,
D.; Asz Sigall, D.; Ávila Romay, A. A.; Barba Gastelum, J. A.; de la Peña
Salcedo, J. A.; Escalante Salgado, P. E.; Gallardo Palacios, G. J.;
Guerrero-Gonzalez, G. A.; Morales De la Cerda, R.; Ponce Olivera, R. M.; Rossano
Soriano, F.; Solís Tinoco, E.; Welsh Hernández, E. C.; Evidence-Based Treatment
for Gynoid Lipodystrophy: A Review of the Recent Literature. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 17
(6), 977–983 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12555
6. Pilch,
W.; Czerwińska-Ledwig, O.; Chitryniewicz-Rostek, J.; Nastałek, M.; Krężałek,
P.; Jędrychowska, D.; Totko-Borkusewicz, N.; Uher, I.; Kaško, D.; Tota, Ł.;
Tyka, A.; Tyka, A.; Piotrowska, A.; The Impact of Vibration Therapy
Interventions on Skin Condition and Skin Temperature Changes in Young Women
with Lipodystrophy: A Pilot Study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative
Medicine (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8436325
7. Puviani,
M.; Tovecci, F.; Milani, M.; A Two-Center, Assessor-Blinded, Prospective Trial
Evaluating the Efficacy of a Novel Hypertonic Draining Cream for Cellulite
Reduction: A Clinical and Instrumental (Antera 3D CS) Assessment. J Cosmet
Dermatol, 17, pp.448–453 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12467
8. Ramalho
Pianez, L.R.; CustódioF.S.; Guidi, R.M.; de Freitas, J.N.; Sant'Ana E .;
Effectiveness of Carboxytherapy in the Treatment of Cellulite in Healthy Women:
A Pilot Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, 9, pp. 183–190 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S102503
9. Rodrigues,
F.; Alves, A. C.; Nunes, C.; Sarmento, B.; Amaral, M. H.; Reis, S.; Oliveira,
M. B. P. P.; Permeation of Topically Applied Caffeine from a Food By-Product in
Cosmetic Formulations: Is Nanoscale in Vitro Approach an Option? Int J Pharm,
513, pp.496–503 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.059
10. Schonvvetter
B, Marques Soares JL, Bagatin E.; Longitudinal Evaluation of Manual Lymphatic
Drainage for the Treatment of Gynoid Lipodystrophy. An Bras Dermatol, 89, pp.
712–718 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143130
11. Tokarska,K..;
Tokarski,S.; Woźniacka,A.; Sysa.-Jędrzejowska, A.; Bogaczewicz,J .; Cellulite:
A Cosmetic or Systemic Issue? Contemporary Views on the Etiopathogenesis of Cellulite. Postepy
Dermatol Alergol, 35, pp. 442–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.77235
12. Tomaszewicz,
V.; Bach, A. M.; Tafil-Klawe, M.; Klawe, J. J.; Non-Invasive Evaluation
Techniques to Efficacy of Anti-Cellulite Treatment: The High Frequency (HF)
Ultrasound as a Useful Imaging Technique of the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue. J
Cosmet Laser Ther, 23, pp.72–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2021.1964537
13. Wilczyński,
S.; Koprowski, R.; Deda, A.; Janiczek, M.; Kuleczka, N.; Błońska-Fajfrowska,
B.; Thermographic Mapping of the Skin Surface in Biometric Evaluation of
Cellulite Treatment Effectiveness. Skin Res Technol, 23 ,pp.61–69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12301
Appendix F.
1. Abosabaa SA, Arafa MG, ElMeshad AN.; Drug Delivery
Systems Integrated with Conventional and Advanced Treatment Approaches toward
Cellulite Reduction. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol; 60:102084 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2020.102084
2. Adamczak
M, Więcek A.; The adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Semin Nephrol; 33:2–13
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2012.12.008
3. Agarwal
AK, Garg, A.; Genetic Basis of Lipodystrophies and Management of Metabolic
Complications. Annu Rev Med; 57:297–311 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.57.022605.114424
4. Akinci G, Celik M, Akinci B.; Complications of
Lipodystrophy Syndromes. Presse Méd; 50:104085 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104085
5. Alizadeh Z, Halabchi F, Mazaheri R,
Abolhasani M, Tabesh MT.; Review of the Mechanisms and Effects of Noninvasive Body Contouring
Devices on Cellulite and Subcutaneous Fat. Int J Endocrinol Metab; 14:e36727
(2016). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3672
6. Alomairi
RM, Alotaibi LN, Al Jamal M.; An Overview with Noninvasive Body Countering in
The Management of Cellulite. EJHM; 70:1254–1258 (2018). https://doi.org/10.12816/0044632
7. Araújo-Vilar
D, Santini F.; Diagnosis and Treatment of Lipodystrophy: A Step-by-Step
Approach. J Endocrinol Invest; 42:61-73 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0887-z
8. Atakan
MM, Koşar ŞN, Güzel Y, Tin HT, Yan X, Sellayah D.; The Role of Exercise, Diet,
and Cytokines in Preventing Obesity and Improving Adipose Tissue. Nutrients;
13: 1459 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051459
9. Avci
P, Nyame TT, Gupta GK, Sadasivam M, Hamblin MR.; Low-Level Laser Therapy for
Fat Layer Reduction: A Comprehensive Review. Lasers Surg Med; 45:1029-1050
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22153
10. Baryluk
A, Łuniewska M, Garczyński W, Gębska M, Weber-Nowakowska K.; Anti-Cellulite and
Slimming Effect of Vacuum Massage - a Case Study. J Educ Health Sport;
7:215–227 (2017).
11. Bass
LS, Kaminer MS.; Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Cellulite: A Review.
Dermato Surg; 46 Suppl 1: S77-S85 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002388
12. Bauer J, Dereń E.; Standaryzacja badan
termograficznych w medycynie i fizykoterapii. Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica
Medica, Biomed Eng, 20 (1), 11–20 (2014).
13. Brown
RJ, Araujo-Vilar D, Cheung PT, Dunger D, Garg A.; The Diagnosis and Management
of Lipodystrophy Syndromes: A Multi-Society Practice Guideline. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab; 101:4500–4511 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2466
14. Cañis
Parera M., Expósito Izquierdo M, Cabré Vila J.J.; Historical Review of Studies
on Sacroiliac Fatty Nodules (Recently Termed “Back Mice”) as a Potential Cause
of Low Back Pain. Pain and Therapy; 10:1029 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00321-5
15. Ceccarini
G, Magno S, Gilio D, Pelosini C, Santini F.; Autoimmunity in Lipodystrophy
Syndromes. Presse Méd; 50:104073 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104073
16. Chevalier
B, Lemaitre M, Leguier L, Mapihan KL, Douillard C, Jannin A, Espiard S,
Vantyghem MC.; Metreleptin Treatment of Non-HIV Lipodystrophy Syndromes. Presse
Méd; 50:104070 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104070
17. Christman
MP, Belkin D, Geronemus RG, Brauer J.; An Anatomical Approach to Evaluating and
Treating Cellulite. J Drugs Dermatol; 16:58-61 (2017).
18. Contents.
La Presse Médicale; 50:104102 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0755-4982(21)00039-7
19. Cook K, Ali O, Akinci B, Foss de
Freitas MC, Montenegro RM, Fernandes VO, Gupta D, Lou KJ, Tuttle E, Oral EA,
Brown RJ.; Effect of Leptin Therapy on Survival in Generalized and Partial
Lipodystrophy: A Matched Cohort Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 106:e2953–e2967
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab216
20. Cortés
V, Santos JL.; Clinical Presentation and Treatment of Primary Lipodystrophies.
Rev Med Chil; 147:1449–1457 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872019001101449
21. Cunha M, Cunha A, Machado M.;
Physiophatology of Gynoid Lipodystrophy. Surg Cosmet Dermatol; 2:98–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5935/scd1984-8773.2015721
22. Dettlaff-Pokora
A.; Zaburzenia Różnicowania Adipocytów Oraz Metabolizmu i Transportu Lipidów w
Adipocytach - Główne Przyczyny Genetycznie Uwarunkowanych Lipodystrofii:
Adipocyte Differentiation Impairment as Well as Lipid Metabolism and Transport
Problems - Major Causes of Genetic Lipodystrophies. Postepy Hig Med Dosw;
73:741–761 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.6553
23. Draelos
ZD.; Commentary on Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum-Aaes for the Treatment
of Cellulite in Women: Results From 2 Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled
Trials. Dermatol Surg; 47:657 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002968
24. Emanuele
E, Minoretti P, Altabas K, Gaeta E, Altabas V.; Adiponectin Expression in
Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue is Reduced in Women with Cellulite. Int J Dermatol;
50:412–416 (2011).
25. Fernández-Pombo
A, Sánchez-Iglesias S, Cobelo-Gómez S, Hermida-Ameijeiras Á, Araújo-Vilar D.;
Presse Med; 50:104071 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104071
26. Fiorenza
CG, Chou SH, Mantzoros CS.; Lipodystrophy: Pathophysiology and Advances in
Treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol; 7:137–150 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2010.199
27. Friedmann
DP, Vick GL, Mishra V.; Cellulite: a review with a focus on subcision. Clin
Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 7:17-23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S95830
28. Garg
A, Agarwal AK.; Lipodystrophies: Disorders of Adipose Tissue Biology. Biochem
Biophys Acta; 1791:507–513 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2008.12.014
29. Garg
A.; Clinical Review: Lipodystrophies: Genetic and Acquired Body Fat Disorders.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 96:3313–3325 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-1159
30. Gargas,
J.; Endogenne i egzogenne czynniki wpływające na powstawanie cellulitu. Profilaktyka i różne metody walki z
tym defektem. Endogenic and egzogenic factors of occurrence of cellulte.
Prevention and various methods of alleviating the defect (2013).
31. Gold
MH, Khatri KA, Hails K, Weiss RA, Fournier N.; Reduction in Thigh Circumference
and Improvement in the Appearance of Cellulite with Dual-Wavelength, Low-Level
Laser Energy and Massage. J Cosmet Laser Ther; 13:13–20 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2011.552608
32. Gold
MH.; Cellulite - an Overview of Non-Invasive Therapy with Energy-Based Systems.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 10:553–558 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1610-0387.2012.07950.x
33. Goldberg
DJ; editor. Lasery
i Światło Vol. II. Elsevier
Urban&Partner Wrocław; (2011).
34. Goldman
A, Wu S, Sun Y, Schavelzon D, Blugerman G.; Gynoid Lipodystrophy Treatment and
Other Advances on Laser-Assisted Liposuction. In: Serdev N, editor. Advanced
Techniques in Liposuction and Fat Transfer. InTech; (2011). https://doi.org/10.5772/24545
35. Goldman
MP, Hexel D; editors. Cellulite: Pathophysiology and Treatment. Basic and
Clinical Dermatology Series. 2nd Ed. Taylor & Francis Group; (2010).
36. Goldman
MP, Hexsel, D; editors. Cellulite: pathophysiology and treatment. CRC Press;
(2010).
37. Guida
S, Bovari B, Canta PL, Dell’Avanzato R, Galimberti M, Migliori G, Pellacani G,
Bencini PL.; Multicenter Study of Vacuum-Assisted Precise Tissue Release for
the Treatment of Cellulite in a Cohort of 112 Italian Women Assessed with
Cellulite Dimples Scale at Rest. J Cosmet Laser Ther; 21:7–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2019.1683209
38. Haneke
E.; Cellulite: Fakty i Mity/ Facts and Myths. Derm Estet:132-138 vol.44; (2006).
39. Hebert
Y. Cellulite Treatments. In: Pfenniger JL, Fowler GC, editors. Pfenninger and
Fowler's Procedures for Primary Care. Mosby; P. 336-340 (2020).
40. Herman
A, Herman AP.; Caffeine’s Mechanisms of Action and Its Cosmetic Use. Skin
Pharmacol Physiol; 26:8-14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1159/000343174
41. Hexsel D, Blessmann Weber M, Taborda
ML, Dal'Forno T, Zechmeister-Prado D.; Celluqol® - instrumento de avaliação de
qualidade de vida em pacientes com celulite. Surg Cosmet Dermatol; 3:96–101 (2011).
42. Hexsel
D, Siega C, Schilling-Souza J, Hehn De Oliveira D.; Noninvasive Treatment of
Cellulite Utilizing an Expedited Treatment Protocol with a Dual Wavelength
Laser-Suction and Massage Device. J Cosmet Laser Ther; 15:65-69 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2012.759237
43. Hexsel
D, Siega C, Schilling-Souza J, Porto MD, Rodrigues TC.; A Bipolar
Radiofrequency, Infrared, Vacuum and Mechanical Massage Device for Treatment of
Cellulite: A Pilot Study J Cosmet Laser Ther; 13:297-302 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2011.630086
44. Hexsel
D, Soirefmann M. Cellulite: Definition and Evaluation. In: Humbert P, Fanian F,
Maibach HI, Agache P; editors. Agache’s Measuring the Skin: Non-invasive
Investigations, Physiology, Normal Constants. Springer International
Publishing; p. 695–702 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32383-1_97
45. Hussain
I, Garg A.; Lipodystrophy Syndromes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 45:783-79
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2016.06.012
46. Ibrahim
O, Haimovic A, Lee N. Efficacy Using a Modified Technique for Tissue
Stabilized-Guided Subcision for the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Cellulite of
the Buttocks and Thighs. Dermatol Surg surgery; 44:1272-1277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001542
47. Janda
K, Tomikowska A. Cellulite- Causes, prevention,treatment. Pomeranian J Life
Sci; 60:29–38 (2014).
48. Jéru
I. Genetics of Lipodystrophy Syndromes. Presse Med 2021; 50:104074.
49. Junqueira M Afonso JP, Cardoso de
Mello Tucunduva T, Bussamara Pinheiro MV, Bagatin E. Cellulite: a review. J Cosmet Dermatol 2010;
2:214–219.
50. Junqueira M Afonso JP, Cardoso de
Mello Tucunduva T, Bussamara Pinheiro MV, Bagatin E. Cellulite: A Review. Surg Cosmet Dermatol 2010;
2:214–219.
51. Kaufman-Janette
J, Joseph JH, Kaminer MS, Clark J, Fabi SG. Collagenase Clostridium
Histolyticum-Aaes for the Treatment of Cellulite in Women: Results From Two
Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. Dermatol Surg; 47: 649-656
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002952
52. Kępa
A. Cellulit-Problem z Pogranicza Medycyny i Kosmetologii. Kosmetol Estet 2014; 3:135–143.
53. Khan
MH, Victor F, Rao B, Sadick NS. Treatment of cellulite: part II. Advances and
controversies. J. Am. Acad Dermatol; 62:373–384 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.041
54. Knebel
B, Müller-Wieland D, Kotzka J. Lipodystrophies-Disorders of the Fatty Tissue.
Int J Mol Sci; 21:8778 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228778
55. Krasowska D, Rudnicka L, Dańczak-Pazdrowska
A, Chodorowska G, Woźniacka A. Localized Scleroderma (Morphea). Diagnostic and Therapeutic
Recommendations of the Polish Dermatological Society: Twardzina Ograniczona
(Morphea). Rekomendacje Diagnostyczno-Terapeutyczne Polskiego
Towarzystwa Dermatologicznego. Przegl Dermatol; 106:333–353 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5114/dr.2019.88252
56. Krysiak
R, Rudzki H, Okopień B. Lipodystrophy: a new insight into an old disease.
Przegl Lek; 69:9–56 (2012).
57. Kushner
RF, Gudivaka R, Schoeller DA. Clinical Characteristics Influencing
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Measurements. Am J Clin Nutr; 64(3
Suppl):423S-427S (1996). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/64.3.423S
58. La Press Medicale.Editorial
Board. La Presse
Médicale, 50:104-101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0755-4982(21)00038-5
59. Lemaitre
M, Chevalier B, Jannin A, Bourry J, Espiard S, Vantyghem MC. Multiple Symmetric
and Multiple Familial Lipomatosis. Presse Med; 50:104077 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104077
60. Leszko M. Cellulite in Menopause. Przegląd Menopauzalny;
13:298–304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2014.46472
61. Loh
NY, Minchin JEN, Pinnick KE, Verma M, Todorčević M.. RSPO3 Impacts Body Fat
Distribution and Regulates Adipose Cell Biology in Vitro. Nat Commun; 11:2797
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16592-z
62. Lopes-Martins RAB, Paretta Barbaroto
D, Da Silva Barbosa E, Sardinha Leonardo P, Ruiz-Silva C, Lo Schiavo Arisawa
EA. Infrared
Thermography as Valuable Tool for Gynoid Lipodystrophy (Cellulite) Diagnosis.
Lasers Med Sci; 37:2639-2644 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03530-2
63. Ludwikowska,
B. Skuteczność substancji roślinnych i zabiegów kosmetycznych w różnych
stadiach cellulitu i rozstępach. The effectiveness of plant substances and cosmetic treatments in various
stages of cellulite and stretch marks (2016).
64. Luo
L, Lane ME. Topical and Transdermal Delivery of Caffeine. Int J Pharm;
490:155–164 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.05.050
65. Luo L, Liu M. Adipose Tissue in
Control of Metabolism. J Endocrinol; 231:77-99 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-16-0211
66. Mancuso
P. The Role of Adipokines in Chronic Inflammation. Immunotargets Ther; 5:47–56
(2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/ITT.S73223
67. Mann
JP, Savage DB. What Lipodystrophies Teach Us about the Metabolic Syndrome. J
Clin Invest; 129:4009–4021 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI129190
68. Martins
da Silva C, de Mello Pinto MV, Barbosa LG, Dos Santos Filho SD, Valente Rocha
LL, Vilela Gonçalves R. Effect of Ultrasound and Hyaluronidase on Gynoid
Lipodystrophy Type II – An Ultrasonography Study. Cosmet Laser Ther; 15:231-236
(2013). https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2012.758374
69. Migasiewicz
A, Dereń E, Podbielska H, Bauer J. Jakość życia kobiet w zależności od stadium
cellulitu. Acta
Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica. Inż Biomed; 20:217-226 (2014).
70. Migasiewicz
A, Sobańska A, Dereń E, Pelleter M, Giemza A, Podbielska H, Bauer J.
Komputerowo wspomagana ocena skuteczności terapii cellulitu na podstawie
obrazowania termograficznego. Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica. Inż Biomed; 23:87–95 (2017).
71. Mirrashed
F, Sharp JC, Krause V, Morgan J, Tomanek B. Pilot Study of Dermal and
Subcutaneous Fat Structures by MRI in Individuals Who Differ in Gender, BMI,
and Cellulite Grading. Skin Res Technol; 10:161–168 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00072.x
72. Misbah
HK, Rao BK, Sadick NS. Cellulit i podskórna tkanka tłuszczowa: różnice
i podobieństwa (Cellulite and subcutaneous adipose tissue: differences and
similarities) In: Katz BE, Sadick NS, editors. Modelowanie sylwetki
3rd Ed. Urban&Partner Wrocław; p. 19–30 (2011).
73. Mlosek
RK, Dębowska RM, Lewandowski M, Malinowska S, Nowicki A, Eris I. Imaging of the
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Using Classical and High-Frequency
Ultrasonographies in Anti-Cellulite Therapy. Skin Res Technol 2011; 17:461–68
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00519.x
74. Nabrdalik
K, Strózik A, Minkina-Pędras M, Jarosz-Chobot P, Młynarski W, Grzeszczak W,
Gumprecht J. Dunnigan-Type Familial Partial Lipodystrophy Associated with the
Heterozygous R482W Mutation in LMNA Gene – Case Study of Three Women from One
Family: Związek Rodzinnej Częściowej Lipodystrofii Typu Dunnigana z
Heterozygotyczną Mutacją R482W w Genie LMNA – Opis Przypadku Trzech Kobiet
Pochodzących z Jednej Rodziny. Endokrynol Pol; 64:306–310 (2013).
75. Napierała M, Muszkieta R., Cieślicka M, Zukow
W, editors. Zdrowie i rekreacja ludzi w różnym wieku. Bydgoszcz-Poznań; (2013).
76. Nikolis
A, Enright KM, Sapra S, Khanna J. A Multicenter, Retrospective Evaluation of
Tissue Stabilized-Guided Subcision in the Management of Cellulite. Aesthetic
Surgery Journal; 39:884–892 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy274
77. Nürnberger
F, Müller G. So-Called Cellulite: An Invented Disease. J Dermatol Surg Onco;
4:221–229 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1978.tb00416.x
78. Oliveira dos Santos J, Santos
Carvalho S, Santos Guimarães AS, Galvão Portugal Passos AC, Matos de Sousa F,
Dias dos Santos Í; Lopes da Paixão E, Amaral dos Santos TS, Gonçalves de Souza
R, Pereira Fernandes L. Tratamentos estéticos não invasivos da Lipodistrofia
Ginóide: Revisão de literatura. Journal of Multiprofessional Health Research; (2021).
79. Oliveira Modena DA, Nogueira da
Silva C, Grecco C, Michelini Guidi R, Gomes Moreira R, Coelho AA, Sant’Ana E,
de Souza JR. Extracorporeal
Shockwave: Mechanisms of Action and Physiological Aspects for Cellulite, Body
Shaping, and Localized Fat—Systematic Review. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2017;
19:314–319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1334928
80. Pavlova
V, Paskaleva R, Ivanova V. Methods for the Diagnosis of Gynoid-Type Obesity and
Cellulitis. Varna Medical Forum; 6:264–270 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14748/vmf.v6i0.5292
81. Pérez Atamoros FM, Alcalá Pérez D,
Asz Sigall D, Ávila Romay AA, Barba Gastelum JA, de la Peña Salcedo JA,
Escalante Salgado PE, Gallardo Palacios GJ, Guerrero-Gonzalez GA, Morales De la
Cerda R, Ponce Olivera RM, Rossano Soriano F, Solís Tinoco E, Welsh Hernández
EC. Evidence-based
treatment for gynoid lipodystrophy: A review of the recent literature. J Cosmet
Dermatol; 17:977–983 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12555
82. Petti
C, Stoneburner J, McLaughlin L. Laser Cellulite Treatment and Laser-Assisted
Lipoplasty of the Thighs and Buttocks: Combined Modalities for Single Stage
Contouring of the Lower Body. Lasers Surg Med; 48:14-22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22437
83. Petti
C, Stoneburner J, McLaughlin L. Laser cellulite treatment and laser‐assisted lipoplasty of the thighs and buttocks: Combined modalities for
single stage contouring of the lower body. Lasers Surg Med; 48:14-22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22437
84. Pianez
LR, Custódio FS, Guidi RM, de Freitas JN, Sant'Ana E. Effectiveness
ofcarboxytherapy in the treatment of cellulite in healthy women: a pilot study.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 9:183-190 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S102503
85. Pieniążkiewicz
JM, editor. Cellulit – Profilaktyka i Zwalczanie. Współpraca Kosmetologa z Lekarzami Różnych
Specjalizacji. Wydawnictwo Raabe; p. 487-491 (2006).
86. Pilch
W, Czerwińska-Ledwig O, Chitryniewicz-Rostek J, Nastałek M, Krężałek P,
Jędrychowska D, Totko-Borkusewicz N, Uher I, Kaško D, Tota Ł, Tyka A, Tyka A,
Piotrowska A. The Impact of Vibration Therapy Interventions on Skin Condition
and Skin Temperature Changes in Young Women with Lipodystrophy: A Pilot Study.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med p. 1-9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8436325
87. Pilch
W, Nastałek M, Piotrowska A, Czerwińska-Ledwig O, Zuziak R, Maciorowska A,
Golec J. The Effects of a 4-Week Vibrotherapy Programme on the Reduction of
Adipose Tissue in Young Women with Cellulite - a Pilot Study: Wpływ 4
Tygodniowej Wibroterapii Na Redukcję Tkanki Tłuszczowej u Młodych Kobiet z
Cellulitem - Badania Pilotażowe. Med Rehabil; 22:18–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.0109
88. Piotrowska
A, Czerwinska-Ledwig O. Effect of Three-Week Vibrotherapy on Selected Skin
Parameters of Thighs and Buttocks in Women with Cellulite. Cosmetics; 9:16
(2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9010016
89. Piotrowska
A, Czerwińska-Ledwig O, Stefańska M, Pałka T, Maciejczyk M, Bujas P, Bawelski
M, Ridan T, Żychowska M, Sadowska-Krępa E, Dębiec-Bąk A. Changes in Skin
Microcirculation Resulting from Vibration Therapy in Women with Cellulite. Int
J Environ Res Public Health 19(6) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063385
90. Proebstle TM. Cellulite. Hautarzt; 61:864–872 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-010-1986-8
91. Renajd
R, Sidharth C, Kroshinsky D. Cellulitis: A Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis,
and Management. Med Clin North Am; 105:723-735 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2021.04.009
92. Richards
K. United States Patent: 11246812 - Compositions and Methods for the Treatment
of Cellulite. 11246812, February 15, (2022).
93. Ring
F. The Historical Development of Thermometry and Thermal Imaging in Medicine,.
J Med Eng Technol; 4:192–198 (2006).
94. Roe
E, Serra E, Guzman G, Sajoux I. Structural Changes of Subcutaneous Tissue
Valued by Ultrasonography in Patients with Cellulitis Following Treatment with
the PnKCelulitis® Program. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol; 11:20-25 (2018).
95. Rondanelli
M, Opizzi A, Perna S, Faliva MA, Buonocore D, Pezzoni G, Michelotti A,
Marchetti R, Marzatico F. Significant two-weeks clinical efficacy of an
association between Massaciuccoli peat and sodium chloride water of Undulna
Thermae measured on gynoid lipodystrophy in a group of overweight female. Ann
Ig; 24:369–378 (2012).
96. Rosales Ricardo Y. Masaje y
Ejercicios Físicos En Casos Con Paniculopatía Oedemato-Fibro Esclerótica En La
Atención Primaria. Rev
haban cienc méd; 13:475–486 (2014).
97. Rossi
ABR, Vergnanini AL. Cellulite: A Review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2000;
14:251–262 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00016.x
98. Rossi
AM, Katz BE. A modern approach to the treatment of cellulite. Dermatol Clin.;
32:51–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2013.09.005
99. Rubanyi
GM, Johns A, Kauser K. Effect of estrogen on endothelial function and
angiogenesis. Vascul Pharmacol; 38:89–98 (2002).
100. Sadick
N. Treatment for Cellulite. Int J Womens Dermatol; 5:68-72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.09.002
101. Salati
SA. Cellulite: A Review of the Current Treatment Modalities. J Pak Ass
Dermatol; 31:500–510 (2021).
102. Sbarbati
A, Accorsi D, Benati D, Marchetti L, Orsini G. Subcutaneous adipose tissue
classification. Eur J Histochem; 54:226-230 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2010.e48
103. Schonvvetter
B, Soares JLM, Bagatin E. Longitudinal Evaluation of Manual Lymphatic Drainage
for the Treatment of Gynoid Lipodystrophy. An Bras Dermatol; 89:712–718
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143130
104. Seidenari
S, Bassoli S, Flori ML, Rigano L, Sparavigna A, Vesnaver R, Berardesca E.
Methods for the Assessment of the Efficacy of Products and Slimming Treatments
for Cellulite According to the Italian Interdisciplinary Group for the
Standardization of Efficacy Tests on Cosmetic Products. G Ital Dermatol
Venereol; 148:217–223 (2013).
105. Siemińska
L. Adipose tissue. Pathophysiology, distribution, sex differences and the role
in inflammation and cancerogenesis. Endokrynol Pol; 58:330–342 (2007).
106. Smalls
LK, Hicks M, Passeretti D, Gersin K, Kitzmille WJ. Effect of weight loss on
cellulite: gynoid lypodystrophy. Reconstr Surg 2006; 118:510-516 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000227629.94768.be
107. Sorkina
E, Chichkova V. Generalized Lipoatrophy Syndromes. Presse Med; 50:104075
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104075
108. Sulivan
T, de Barra E. Diagnosis and Management of Cellulitis. Clin Med (Lon);
18:160-163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-160
109. Szubert
M, Dębowska R, Bazela K, Eris I, Różański L. Zastosowanie Termografii w
Diagnostyce Cellulitu. Dermatol;
8:85-89 (2006).
110. Szydlowska-Pawlak
P, Barszczewska O, Sołtysiak I, Librowska B, Kozlowski R, Engelseth P, Marczak
M, Kilańska D. Nursing Care Plan for a Newborn with the Defect of Congenital
Gastroschisis in the Postoperative Period Using ICNPTM and the Dedicated
Software. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 19:3498 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063498
111. Terranova F, Berardesca E, Maibach
H. Cellulite: nature and aetiopathogenesis. Int J Cosmet Sci; 28:157–167 (2006).
112. Thomas
DD, Stockman MC, Yu L, Meshulam T, McCarthy AC, Ionson A, Burritt N, Deeney J,
Cabral H, Corkey B, Istfan N, Apovian CM. Effects of Medium Chain Triglycerides
Supplementation on Insulin Sensitivity and Beta Cell Function: A Feasibility
Study. PLoS One; 14:e0226200 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226200
113. Tianyi
FL, Mbanga CM, Danwang C, Agbor VN. Risk Factors and Complications of Lower
Limb Cellulitis in Africa: A Systematic Review. BMJ Open; 8
(7) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021175
114. Tokarska
K, Tokarski S, Woźniacka A, Sysa-Jędrzejowska A, Bogaczewicz J. Cellulite: A
Cosmetic or Systemic Issue? Contemporary Views on the Etiopathogenesis of Cellulite. Postepy
Dermatol Alergol; 35:442–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.77235
115. Tomaselli F, Caputo MG, Cogliano M,
Macali T, Bartoletti CA. Il microcircolo: correlazioni fisiopatologiche. Approccio farmacologico. La Med.
Est; 21:p.267–273 (1987).
116. Tomaszewicz
V, Zalewski P, Klawe JJ, Tafil-Klawe M, Kołodziejska K, Cieściński J, Lasek W.
Nieinwazyjna ocena struktury tkanek skóry oraz analiza składu ciała osób z
rozpoznaniem zmian cellulitowych – analiza przypadku. Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica;
16:341-344 (2010).
117. Trelles
M, Lugt C, Mordon S, Ribé A, Al-Zarouni M. Histological Findings in Adipocytes
When Cellulite Is Treated with a Variable-Emission Radiofrequency System.
Lasers Med Sci; 25:191–195 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0664-5
118. Turati
F, Pelucchi C, Marzatico F, Ferraroni M, Decarli A, Gallus S, La Vecchia C,
Galeone C. Efficacy of Cosmetic Products in Cellulite Reduction: Systematic
Review and Meta-Analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 28(1), 1–15
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12193
119. Valentim da Silva, R.M..;
Barichello,P.A.; Medeiros,M.L.; de Mendonca,W.C.M.; Dantos,J.S.C..;
Ronzio,O.A.; Froes,P.M.; Galandari,H.. Effect of Capacitive Radiofrequency on the
Fibrosis of Patients with Cellulite. Dermatol Res Pract p.1-6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/715829
120. Vantyghem
MC, Balavoine AS, Douillard C, Defrance F, Dieudonne L, Mouton F, Lemaire C,
Bertrand-Escouflaire N, Bourdelle-Hego MF, Devemy F, Evrard A, Gheerbrand D,
Girardot C, Gumuche S, Hober C, Topolinski H, Lamblin B, Mycinski B, Ryndak A,
Karrouz W, Duvivier E, Merlen E, Cortet C, Weill J, Lacroix D, Wémeau JL. How
to Diagnose a Lipodystrophy Syndrome. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2012; 73:170–189
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2012.04.010
121. Vantyghem
MC, editor. La Presse Médicale; 50:104082 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104082
122. Varlet
AA, Desgrouas C, Jebane C, Bonello-Palot N, Bourgeois P, Levy N, Helfer E,
Dubois N, Valero R, Badens C, Beliard S. A Rare Mutation in LMNB2 Associated
with Lipodystrophy Drives Premature Cell Senescence. Cells;
11(1):50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11010050
123. Vignes
S, Poizeau F, Dupuy A. Cellulitis Risk Factors for Patients with Primary or
Secondary Lymphoedema. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 10:179-185
(2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.04.009
124. Vigouroux
C, Caron-Debarle M, Le Dour C, Magré J, Capeau J. Molecular Mechanisms of Human
Lipodystrophies: From Adipocyte Lipid Droplet to Oxidative Stress and
Lipotoxicity. Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 43:862–876 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2011.03.002
125. Vincent
C, Szubert M, Dębowska R, Bazela K, Eris I. Zastosowanie Termografii w
Diagnostyce Cellulitu. Dermatol Estet;
2:85–89 (2006).
126. von
Schnurbein J, Adams C, Akinci B, Ceccarini G, D’Apice MR, Gambineri A, Hennekam
RCM, Jeru I, Lattanzi G, Miehle K, Nagel G, Novelli G, Santini F, Santos Silva
E, Savage DB, Sbraccia P, Schaaf J, Sorkina E, Tanteles G, Vantyghem MC, Vatier
C, Vigouroux C, Vorona E, Araújo-Vilar D, Wabitsch M. European Lipodystrophy
Registry: Background and Structure. Orphanet J Rare Dis; 15:17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-1295-y
127. Wilczyński
S, Koprowski R, Deda A, Janiczek M, Kuleczka N, Błońska-Fajfrowska B.
Thermographic Mapping of the Skin Surface in Biometric Evaluation of Cellulite
Treatment Effectiveness. Skin Res Technol; 23:61–69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12301
128. Wojnowska
D. Czy Można Zapobiec Konsekwencjom Menopauzy Dla Skóry?: How to
Prevent Menopausal Consequences for Skin? Menopausal Rev/Prz Menopauzalny; 12(1):69–77
(2013). https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2013.33425
129. Wolfe
HR, Rosenberg E, Ciftci K, Edgecombe J, McLane MP. Evaluation of Alternative
Diluents for Clinical Use of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH-Aaes). J
of Cosmet Dermatol; 20: 1643-1647 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14078
130. Young
VL, DiBernardo BE. Comparison of Cellulite Severity Scales and Imaging Methods.
Aesthet Surg J; 41:NP521–NP537 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa226
131. Zegarska
B, WoźniakM, Juhnke A, Kaczmarek-Skamira E, Dzierżanowski M.
Cellulit (II). Nazewnictwo, Definicja, Związek Występowania z Wiekiem, Płcią i
Budową Ciała,. Dermatol
Estetet; 1(72):29–31 (2011).
132. Żuber J, Jung A, editors. Metody Termograficzne w Diagnostyce Medycznej/ Thermographic methods in medical diagnostic. Bamar Marketing – Wydawnictwo; (1997).
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All authors declare that this research did not receive any research funding.
1. Roe
E., Serra E., Guzman G., et al.; Structural Changes of Subcutaneous Tissue
Valued by Ultrasonography in Patients with Cellulitis Following Treatment with
the PnKCelulitis® Program. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 2018; 11:20-25.
2. Bass LS, Kaminer MS Insights into the pathophysiology of
cellulite: a review. Dermatol Surg. 46 Suppl 2020;1(1):S77–S85
3. Giamaica C, Zingaretti N, Amuso D, Dai Prè E, Brandi J,
Cecconi D, Manfredi M, Marengo E, Boschi F, Riccio M, Amore R, Iorio EL, Busato
A, De Francesco F, Riccio V, Parodi PC, Vaienti L, Sbarbati A Proteomic and ultrastructural analysis of
cellulite-new fndings on an old topic. Int J Mol Sci.2022; 21(6):2077
4. Friedmann DP, Vick GL, Mishra V. Cellulite: a review with
a focus on subcision. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2017;10:17–23.
5. Salati
S.A.; Cellulite: A Review of the Current Treatment Modalities. J Pak Assoc
Dermatol, 2021; 31:500–510.
6. Gonzaga da Cunha M., Gonzaga da Cunha A.L.,
Machado C.A.; Hipoderme e tecido adiposo subcutâneo - duas estruturas
diferentes. Surg Cosmet Dermatol, 2014; 6:355-359.
7. Sbarbati
A., Accorsi D., Benati D., et al.; Subcutaneous adipose tissue classification.
Eur J Histochem; 2010; 54:226-30.
8. Gonzaga da Cunha M., Gonzaga da Cunha A.L.,
Machado C.A.; Fisiopatologia da lipodistrofia ginoide. Surg Cosmet
Dermatol, 2015; 7:98–102. https://doi.org/10.5935/scd1984-8773.2015721
9. Mirrashed
F., Sharp J.C., Krause V., et al.; Pilot Study of Dermal and Subcutaneous Fat
Structures by MRI in Individuals Who Differ in Gender, BMI, and Cellulite
Grading. Skin Res Technol, 2004; 10:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00072.x
10. Conti
G., Prè E., Busato A., et al.; Proteomic and Ultrastructural Analysis of
Cellulite— New Findings on an Old Topic. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21:2077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21062077
11. Tomaselli F., Caputo M.G., Cogliano
M., et al.; Il microcircolo: correlazioni fisiopatologiche. Approccio farmacologico. La Med Est,
1987; 21:267–273.
12. Rossi
A.M., Katz B.E.; A modern approach to the treatment of cellulite. Dermatol
Clin, 2014; 32:51–59.
13. Rao
J., Gold M.H., Goldman M.P.; A Two-Center, Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial
Testing the Tolerability and Efficacy of a Novel Therapeutic Agent for
Cellulite Reduction, J Cosmet Dermatol, 2005; 4:93–102.
14. Rubanyi
GM, Johns A, Kauser K.; Effect of estrogen on endothelial function and
angiogenesis. Vascul Pharmacol, 2002; 38:89–98.
15. Junqueira
M., Afonso J.P., Cardoso de Mello, et al.; Cellulite: a review, Surg Cosmet
Dermatol, 2010; 2:214–219.
16. Janda
K., Tomikowska A.; Cellulit-przyczyny, profilaktyka, leczenie (Cellulite:
causes, prevention, treatment). Ann Acad Med Stetin, 2014; 60:29–38.
17. Leszko M.; Cellulite in Menopause. Prz Menopauzalny, 2014;
13:298-304. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2014.46472
18. Schubert
A., Czech M., Advancements in diabetes care in Poland, J Health Policy Outcomes
Reserch, [Internet] 01/2023. DOI:10.7365/JHPOR.2023.1.6.
19. Kępa A.; Cellulit - problem z pogranicza
medycyny i kosmetologii (Cellulite: a problem combining medicine and
cosmetology). Kosmetol Estet, 2014; 3:135-143.
20. Pieniążkiewicz
J.M.; editor. Cellulit – profilaktyka i zwalczanie. Współpraca kosmetologa z
lekarzami różnych specjalizacji (Cellulite: prevention and treatment. Cooperation of a cosmetologist with
doctors of various specialties). Wydawnictwo Raabe Warszawa, 2006; p. 3-13.
21. Alomairi
R.M., Alotaibi L.N., Al Jamal M.; An Overview with Noninvasive Body Countering
in The Management of Cellulite. EJHM, 2018; 70:1254–1258. https://doi.org/10.12816/0044632
22. Nürnberger
F., Müller G.; So-Called Cellulite: An Invented Disease. J Dermatol Surg Oncol,
1978; 4:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1978.tb00416.x
23. Schonvvetter
B., Marques Soares J.L.; Bagatin E. Longitudinal Evaluation of Manual Lymphatic
Drainage for the Treatment of Gynoid Lipodystrophy. An Bras Dermatol, 2014;
89:712-718. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143130
24. Goldman
A., Wu S., Sun Y., et al.; Gynoid Lipodystrophy Treatment and Other Advances on
Laser-Assisted Liposuction. In: Serdev N, editor. Advanced Techniques in
Liposuction and Fat Transfer. InTech, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5772/24545
25. Misbah
H.K., Rao B.K., Sadick N.S.; Cellulit i podskórna tkanka tłuszczowa: różnice
i podobieństwa (Cellulite and subcutaneous adipose tissue: differences and
similarities). In Katz BE, Sadick NS; editors. Modelowanie sylwetki. 3rd Ed.
Urban&Partner Wrocław, 2011; P. 19–30.
26. Tomaszewicz
V., Zalewski P., Klawe J.J., et al.; Nieinwazyjna ocena struktury tkanek skóry
oraz analiza składu ciała osób z rozpoznaniem zmian cellulitowych. Analiza przypadku, (Noninvasive
assessment of skin tissue structure and analysis of body composition of
patients with cellulite diagnosis. Case study). Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica
Medica, 2010; 16:341–344.
27. Rossi
A.B., Vergnanini A.L.; Cellulite: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2000;
14:251–262. https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00016.x
28. Siemińska
L.; Adipose tissue. Pathophysiology, distribution, sex differences and the role
in inflammation and cancerogenesis. Endokrynol Pol, 2007; 58:330–342.
29. Atakan
M.M., Koşar Ş.N., Güzel Y., et al.; The Role of Exercise, Diet, and Cytokines
in Preventing Obesity and Improving Adipose Tissue. Nutrients, 2021;
13:1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051459
30. Tokarska
K., Tokarski S., Woźniacka A., et al.; Cellulite: a cosmetic or systemic issue?
Contemporary views on the etiopathogenesis of cellulite. Postepy Dermatol
Alergol, 2018; 35:442-446.
31. Zegarska
B., Woźniak M., Juhnke A., et al.; Cellulit (II). Nazewnictwo, definicja,
związek występowania z wiekiem, płcią i budową ciała, (Cellulite (II). Name, definition, relation to age,
sex and build). Dermatol Estet, 2011; 1:29–31.
32. Hocking
S., Samocha-Bonet D., Milner K.L., et al.; Adiposity and Insulin Resistance in
Humans: The Role of the Different Tissue and Cellular Lipid Depots. Endocr Rev,
2013; 34:463–500. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2012-1041
33. Arner
P, Rydén M.; Human White Adipose Tissue: A Highly Dynamic Metabolic Organ. J
Intern Med, 2022; 291:611–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13435
34. Oliveira
dos Santos J., Santos Carvalho S., Santos Guimarães A.S., et al.; Tratamentos
estéticos não invasivos da Lipodistrofia Ginóide: Revisão de literature, 2021.
35. Lopes-Martins R.A.B., Peretta
Barbaroto D., Da Silva Barbosa E., et al.; Infrared Thermography as Valuable
Tool for Gynoid Lipodystrophy (Cellulite) Diagnosis. Lasers Med Sci, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03530-2
36. Szczepańska P., Zakrzewski L., Michalska A.,
et al.; Przyczyny Występowania Cellulitu: The Causes of Cellulite. Farm Pol,
2020; 76:686–691. https://doi.org/10.32383/farmpol/132457
37. Szydłowska-Pawlak
P., Barszczewska O., Sołtysiak I., et al.; Nursing Care Plan for a Newborn with
the Defect of Congenital Gastroschisis in the Postoperative Period Using ICNPTM
and the Dedicated Software. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022; 19:3498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063498
38. Ramalho
Pianez L., Silva Custódio F., Michelini Guidi R., et al.; Effectiveness of
Carboxytherapy in the Treatment of Cellulite in Healthy Women: A Pilot Study.
CCID, 2016; 9:183–190. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S102503
39. Pérez
Atamoros F.M., Alcalá Pérez D., Asz Sigall D., et al.; Evidence-Based Treatment
for Gynoid Lipodystrophy: A Review of the Recent Literature. J Cosmet Dermatol,
2018; 17:977–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12555
40. Vincent
C., Szubert M., Dębowska R., et al.; Zastosowanie termografii w diagnostyce
cellulitu. (The use of
thermography in the diagnostics of cellulite) Derm Estet, 2006; 2:85–89.
41. Ring
F.; The historical development of thermometry and thermal imaging in medicine.
J Med Eng Technol, 2006; 30:192-198.
42. Goldman
MP, Hexel D; editors. Cellulite: Pathophysiology and Treatment. Basic and
Clinical Dermatology Series. 2nd Ed. Taylor & Francis Group, 2010.
43. Mlosek
R.K., Dębowska R.M., Lewandowski M., et al.; Imaging of the Skin and
Subcutaneous Tissu eUsing Classical and High-Frequency Ultrasonographies in
Anti-Cellulite Therapy. Skin Res Technol, 2011; 17:461–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00519.x
44. Goldberg
D.J.; editor. Lasery i światło. T. II. Elsevier Uban&Partner Wrocław, 2011;
p. 93– 104.
45. Jahnz-Różyk
K, Samoliński B, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Lis J, Polkowska M, Wróbel K, Smaga A,
Bogusławski S, Bogusławski S. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in
Poland. Economedica AD. J
Health Policy Outcomes Res [Internet]. 02/2020. DOI:10.7365/JHPOR.2020.2.3
46. Migasiewicz
A., Dereń E., Podbielska H., et al.; Jakość życia kobiet w zależności od
stadium cellulitu. (Womens’
quality of life depending on the stage of cellulite). Acta Bio-Optica et
Informatica Medica. Inżynieria Biomedyczna, 2014; 20: 217-226.